Edmond Sara N, Wesolowicz Danielle M, Snow Jennifer L, Currie Sophia, Jankelovits Amanda, Chhabra Manik S, Becker William C
Pain Research Informatics Multimorbidities and Education (PRIME) Center, VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, Connecticut; Department of Psychiatry, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
Pain Research Informatics Multimorbidities and Education (PRIME) Center, VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, Connecticut.
J Pain. 2024 Jan;25(1):132-141. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2023.07.027. Epub 2023 Aug 6.
Guidelines recommend consideration of modification, tapering, or discontinuation of long-term, full-agonist opioid therapy when harms outweigh benefits; one alternative to tapering or discontinuing full-agonist opioids for the management of chronic pain is switching to the partial agonist buprenorphine. As the use of buprenorphine for pain expands, understanding the patient experience during and after the transition to buprenorphine is critical. We conducted 45- to 60-minute semistructured qualitative interviews with 19 patients to understand the experiences of patients with chronic pain actively maintained on buprenorphine after previously receiving full-agonist, long-term opioid therapy. Patients were recruited from 2 medical centers via provider referral. Through thematic analysis, 5 overall themes were identified, including satisfaction with buprenorphine, the importance of preconceptions about buprenorphine, experiences with transitions, patient-provider communication, and potential contributions to racial disparities in pain care. While we heard a range of experiences, most patients were satisfied with buprenorphine, reporting either equivalent pain control to their previous regimens or reporting less analgesia but improved functioning due to a reduction in side effects (eg, mental clarity). Patients also emphasized the importance of a nonjudgmental, patient-centered approach, including education about the risks and benefits of buprenorphine. The few Black patients interviewed all reported limited access to pain care, which is consistent with the well-documented existence of racial disparities in access to pain treatment. As buprenorphine is used more frequently for pain management, provider education focused on pain treatment disparities, patient-centered approaches informed by motivational interviewing, and increasing acceptance of buprenorphine as an option for pain are needed. PERSPECTIVE: Qualitative analyses of patient experiences transitioning from full-agonist opioids to buprenorphine for chronic pain revealed general satisfaction. Patients reflected on functioning, tradeoffs between analgesia and side effects, patient-centered care, and access to treatment, highlighting how future research should focus on outcomes valued by patients.
指南建议,当危害超过益处时,考虑调整、逐渐减少或停用长期的、完全激动剂阿片类药物治疗;逐渐减少或停用完全激动剂阿片类药物以管理慢性疼痛的一种替代方法是改用部分激动剂丁丙诺啡。随着丁丙诺啡用于疼痛治疗的情况增多,了解患者在过渡到丁丙诺啡期间及之后的体验至关重要。我们对19名患者进行了45至60分钟的半结构化定性访谈,以了解先前接受完全激动剂、长期阿片类药物治疗后积极维持使用丁丙诺啡的慢性疼痛患者的体验。患者通过医生转诊从2个医疗中心招募。通过主题分析,确定了5个总体主题,包括对丁丙诺啡的满意度、对丁丙诺啡先入之见的重要性、过渡体验、医患沟通以及对疼痛护理中种族差异的潜在影响。虽然我们听到了一系列体验,但大多数患者对丁丙诺啡感到满意,报告称疼痛控制与之前的治疗方案相当,或者报告称镇痛效果较差,但由于副作用减少(如思维清晰)功能得到改善。患者还强调了非评判性、以患者为中心方法的重要性,包括关于丁丙诺啡风险和益处的教育。接受访谈的少数黑人患者均报告称获得疼痛护理的机会有限,这与有充分记录的疼痛治疗获取方面的种族差异情况一致。随着丁丙诺啡更频繁地用于疼痛管理,需要开展以疼痛治疗差异为重点的医生教育、以动机性访谈为依据的以患者为中心方法,以及提高对丁丙诺啡作为疼痛治疗选择的接受度。观点:对慢性疼痛患者从完全激动剂阿片类药物过渡到丁丙诺啡的体验进行的定性分析显示总体满意度较高。患者思考了功能、镇痛与副作用之间的权衡、以患者为中心的护理以及治疗获取情况,突出了未来研究应如何聚焦于患者重视的结果。