Omara Amany F, Mohsen Hadal Hassan, Mohammed Abo Hagar Alaa, Abdelrahman Ahmed F
Department of Anaesthesia and Surgical Intensive Care, Faculty of Medicine, Tanta University, Tanta, Egypt.
Department of Anaesthesia and Surgical Intensive Care, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Ciro, Egypt.
Local Reg Anesth. 2023 Aug 2;16:113-122. doi: 10.2147/LRA.S419465. eCollection 2023.
This prospective study aimed to compare the analgesic efficacy and adverse effects of intrathecal morphine, dexmedetomidine, and a combination of both in patients undergoing total knee replacement (TKR).
This randomized prospective study was carried out in Tanta university hospital in orthopedic surgery for 6 months on 105 adult patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status Class II and III, aged > 50 years, and scheduled for total knee replacement surgery randomly allocated into morphine group received 0.5% heavy bupivacaine plus 0.1 mg of morphine, morphine/ dexmedetomidine group, received 0.5% heavy bupivacaine plus 0.1 mg of morphine and 5 mcg of dexmedetomidine and dexmedetomidine group received 0.5% heavy bupivacaine plus 5 mcg of dexmedetomidine. The time of the first required analgesia, postoperative pain severity, the total dose of morphine, postoperative complication, and the patient's level of sedation were recorded.
About half of the patients in the dexmedetomidine group requested first rescue analgesia 6 hours after the operation, significantly shorter than the other two groups. On the other hand, the other two groups show no significant difference between them regarding the first required analgesia. At rest, the dexmedetomidine group have significantly higher VAS with a significant increase in patients who required morphine as rescue analgesia than the other two groups. While at movement, patients in the dexmedetomidine group felt pain at 4 hrs postoperatively with significantly higher VAS than the other two groups. At the same time, the sedation score was significantly lower in the dexmedetomidine group than in the other two groups. 22.2% of cases in the morphine group developed nausea and vomiting with a significant difference between the three groups.
Despite the absence of substantial side effects, our findings did not suggest enhanced analgesia with the combination of intrathecal morphine and dexmedetomidine.
本前瞻性研究旨在比较鞘内注射吗啡、右美托咪定以及两者联合应用于全膝关节置换术(TKR)患者的镇痛效果及不良反应。
本随机前瞻性研究在坦塔大学医院骨科手术中进行,为期6个月,纳入105例年龄大于50岁、美国麻醉医师协会身体状况分级为II级和III级、计划行全膝关节置换手术的成年患者,随机分为吗啡组,接受0.5%重比重布比卡因加0.1 mg吗啡;吗啡/右美托咪定组,接受0.5%重比重布比卡因加0.1 mg吗啡和5 mcg右美托咪定;右美托咪定组,接受0.5%重比重布比卡因加5 mcg右美托咪定。记录首次需要镇痛的时间、术后疼痛严重程度、吗啡总剂量、术后并发症以及患者的镇静水平。
右美托咪定组约一半患者在术后6小时首次要求解救镇痛,明显短于其他两组。另一方面,在首次需要镇痛方面,其他两组之间无显著差异。静息状态下,右美托咪定组的视觉模拟评分(VAS)显著更高,需要吗啡作为解救镇痛的患者显著多于其他两组。而在活动时,右美托咪定组患者在术后4小时感到疼痛,VAS显著高于其他两组。同时,右美托咪定组的镇静评分显著低于其他两组。吗啡组22.2%的病例出现恶心和呕吐,三组之间有显著差异。
尽管没有明显的副作用,但我们的研究结果并未表明鞘内注射吗啡和右美托咪定联合应用能增强镇痛效果。