Suppr超能文献

眼动测量作为评估帕金森病临床症状和严重程度的工具。

Oculometric measures as a tool for assessment of clinical symptoms and severity of Parkinson's disease.

机构信息

Department of Neurology, Rabin Medical Center, Movement Disorders Clinic, Beilinson Hospital, 4941492, Petach Tikva, Israel.

Affiliated to Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.

出版信息

J Neural Transm (Vienna). 2023 Oct;130(10):1241-1248. doi: 10.1007/s00702-023-02681-y. Epub 2023 Aug 9.

Abstract

Abnormalities of oculometric measures (OM) are widely described in people with Parkinson's disease (PD). However, knowledge of correlations between abnormal OM, disease severity and clinical assessment in PD patients is still lacking. To evaluate these correlations, PD patients (215 patients, mean age 69 ± 9.1 years, 79 females) with severe (H&Y > 3) and mild to moderate (H&Y ≤ 2) disease, and 215 age-matched healthy subjects were enrolled. All patients were evaluated using MDS-UPDRS and an oculometric test using computer vision and deep learning algorithms. Comparisons of OM between groups and correlations between OM and MDS-UPDRS scores were calculated. Saccadic latency (ms) was prolonged in patients with severe compared with mild to moderate disease (pro-saccades: 267 ± 69 vs. 238 ± 53, p = 0.0011; anti-saccades: 386 ± 119 vs. 352 ± 106, p = 0.0393) and in patients with mild to moderate disease versus healthy subjects (pro-saccades: 238 ± 53 vs. 220 ± 45, p = 0.0003; anti-saccades: 352 ± 106 vs. 289 ± 71, p < 0.0001). Error rate (%) was higher among patients with severe (64.06 ± 23.08) versus mild to moderate disease (49.84 ± 24.81, p = 0.0001), and versus healthy subjects (49.84 ± 24.81 vs. 28.31 ± 21.72, p = 0.00001). Response accuracy (%) was lower for patients with severe (75.66 ± 13.11) versus mild to moderate disease (79.66 ± 13.56, p = 0.0462), and versus healthy subjects (79.66 ± 13.56 vs. 90.27 ± 8.79, p < 0.0001). Pro- and anti-saccadic latency, error rate and accuracy were correlated with MDS-UPDRS scores (r = 0.32, 0.28, 0.36 and -0.30, respectively, p < 0.0001) and similar correlations were found with its axial subscore (R = 0.38, 0.29, 0.44, and -0.30, respectively, p < 0.0001). Several OM were different in patients under levodopa treatment. OM worsened as PD severity increases, and were correlated with MDS-UPDRS scores. Using OM can be implemented for PD patients' assessment as a tool to follow disease progression.

摘要

眼动测量(OM)异常在帕金森病(PD)患者中广泛描述。然而,对于 PD 患者的异常 OM、疾病严重程度和临床评估之间的相关性,我们知之甚少。为了评估这些相关性,纳入了 215 名患有严重(H&Y>3)和轻度至中度(H&Y≤2)疾病的 PD 患者(平均年龄 69±9.1 岁,79 名女性)和 215 名年龄匹配的健康受试者。所有患者均使用 MDS-UPDRS 进行评估,并使用计算机视觉和深度学习算法进行眼动测试。计算了 OM 之间的组间比较以及 OM 与 MDS-UPDRS 评分之间的相关性。与轻度至中度疾病相比,严重疾病患者的扫视潜伏期(ms)延长(直扫视:267±69 对 238±53,p=0.0011;反扫视:386±119 对 352±106,p=0.0393),与健康受试者相比,轻度至中度疾病患者的扫视潜伏期也延长(直扫视:238±53 对 220±45,p=0.0003;反扫视:352±106 对 289±71,p<0.0001)。严重疾病患者的错误率(%)(64.06±23.08)高于轻度至中度疾病患者(49.84±24.81,p=0.0001)和健康受试者(49.84±24.81 对 28.31±21.72,p=0.00001)。严重疾病患者的反应准确率(%)(75.66±13.11)低于轻度至中度疾病患者(79.66±13.56,p=0.0462)和健康受试者(79.66±13.56 对 90.27±8.79,p<0.0001)。直扫视和反扫视潜伏期、错误率和准确率与 MDS-UPDRS 评分相关(r=0.32、0.28、0.36 和-0.30,分别,p<0.0001),与轴性亚评分也有类似的相关性(R=0.38、0.29、0.44 和-0.30,分别,p<0.0001)。一些 OM 在接受左旋多巴治疗的患者中有所不同。随着 PD 严重程度的增加,OM 恶化,与 MDS-UPDRS 评分相关。使用 OM 可以作为评估 PD 患者疾病进展的工具。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/764f/10480268/b8026571e0c9/702_2023_2681_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验