Suppr超能文献

纵跳过程中的全身质量估计与误差传播:一项模拟误差研究。

Whole body mass estimates and error propagation in countermovement jump: a simulated error study.

作者信息

Burnett Jenna K, Kim Yong-Woon, Kwon Hyun Joon, Miller Ross H, Shim Jae Kun

机构信息

Department of Kinesiology, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA.

Department of Physical Education, Kyungnam University, Changwon, Korea.

出版信息

Sports Biomech. 2025 May;24(5):1129-1142. doi: 10.1080/14763141.2023.2236589. Epub 2023 Aug 9.

Abstract

High-velocity actions are central to clinical and athletic performance, with jumping used to assess outcomes in sports medicine. Ground reaction force (GRF)-based methods are the standard for computing jump characteristics, but require mass estimation and GRF integration, potentially resulting in mass errors which influence outcomes. This study investigated how simulated mass errors influenced the centre of mass (CoM) trajectory during a countermovement jump. The mass was estimated from the static GRF, and simulated errors were added or subtracted to the mass. The CoM trajectory with simulated mass errors was computed using the GRF-based method to investigate mass mis-estimation's influence on jump height. A regression model indicated that, for a 1 kg mass change, there was a 7.7 cm jump height change, and the jump height differed by 11.5 ± 0.4 cm from the maximum to minimum error. A 2-way ANOVA identified significant height differences between the starting position, and landing, or final position with mass errors of ± 0.2 or ± 0.4 kg. These results reveal that small mass errors may produce inaccurate conclusions regarding performance changes, and that errors may propagate throughout the jump trajectory. Caution may be necessary when using GRF-based methods to compute jump height as a power proxy.

摘要

高速动作是临床和运动表现的核心,跳跃常用于评估运动医学中的结果。基于地面反作用力(GRF)的方法是计算跳跃特征的标准方法,但需要进行质量估计和GRF积分,这可能会导致质量误差,从而影响结果。本研究调查了模拟质量误差如何影响反向运动跳跃过程中的质心(CoM)轨迹。通过静态GRF估计质量,并对质量添加或减去模拟误差。使用基于GRF的方法计算具有模拟质量误差的CoM轨迹,以研究质量误估计对跳跃高度的影响。一个回归模型表明,对于1千克的质量变化,跳跃高度变化7.7厘米,从最大误差到最小误差,跳跃高度相差11.5±0.4厘米。双向方差分析确定了在起始位置与着陆位置或最终位置之间,当质量误差为±0.2或±0.4千克时,存在显著的高度差异。这些结果表明,小的质量误差可能会对性能变化得出不准确的结论,并且误差可能会在整个跳跃轨迹中传播。在使用基于GRF的方法将跳跃高度作为功率指标进行计算时,可能需要谨慎。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验