• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

根据基因特异性指南重新评估意义不明的变异体的经验。

Experience of reassessing variants of uncertain significance by gene-specific guidelines.

机构信息

Department of Laboratory Medicine and Genetics, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Heart Vascular Stroke Institute, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

J Med Genet. 2023 Dec 21;61(1):57-60. doi: 10.1136/jmg-2023-109433.

DOI:10.1136/jmg-2023-109433
PMID:37558401
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Despite the 2015 American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) and Association of Molecular Pathology (AMP) guideline, many variants of gene remain inconclusive. In line with publication of the specific variant interpretation guideline by ClinGen in 2022, we reassessed variants of uncertain significance (VUS) in gene found in our institution.

METHODS

VUS found in the course of sequencing between December 2015 and April 2022 were reassessed based on -specific variant interpretation guideline, review of updated literatures and additional genetic tests including family study and/or RNA study if available.

RESULTS

Out of 695 patients who underwent sequencing, 61 VUS were found in 69 patients. Among them, 38 VUS in 43 patients (62.3%) were reclassified as pathogenic and likely pathogenic variant ((L)PV), including 20 novel (L)PV. Major causes of reclassification were: (1) gene-specific modification of ACMG/AMP criteria, (2) updated literatures and (3) additional genetic tests. The most important evidence for reclassification was clarification of critical amino acid residues.

CONCLUSIONS

After reassessing variants according to -specific guideline and up-to-date database, a significant number of VUS was reclassified. Clinical laboratories are encouraged to perform variant reassessment at regular intervals or when there is a major change in the principle of variant interpretation.

摘要

背景

尽管 2015 年美国医学遗传学与基因组学学院(ACMG)和分子病理学协会(AMP)指南已经发布,但仍有许多基因的变异结果不确定。为了与 2022 年 ClinGen 发布的特定变异解读指南保持一致,我们重新评估了本机构发现的基因中不确定意义的变异(VUS)。

方法

根据特定的变异解读指南,重新评估了 2015 年 12 月至 2022 年 4 月期间在进行测序过程中发现的 VUS,并对最新文献进行了回顾,同时进行了其他遗传检测,包括家系研究和/或 RNA 研究(如果有条件)。

结果

在接受 测序的 695 例患者中,有 69 例患者发现了 61 个 VUS。其中,43 例患者的 38 个 VUS(62.3%)被重新归类为致病性或可能致病性变异((L)PV),包括 20 个新的 (L)PV。重新分类的主要原因是:(1)特定基因的 ACMG/AMP 标准修订,(2)最新文献,(3)其他遗传检测。重新分类最重要的依据是明确关键氨基酸残基。

结论

根据特定指南和最新数据库对变异进行重新评估后,大量的 VUS 被重新归类。建议临床实验室定期或在变异解读原则发生重大变化时进行变异重新评估。

相似文献

1
Experience of reassessing variants of uncertain significance by gene-specific guidelines.根据基因特异性指南重新评估意义不明的变异体的经验。
J Med Genet. 2023 Dec 21;61(1):57-60. doi: 10.1136/jmg-2023-109433.
2
Reassessment of FBN1 variants of uncertain significance using updated ClinGen guidance for PP1/BS4 and PP4 criteria.使用针对PP1/BS4和PP4标准的最新ClinGen指南重新评估意义未明的FBN1变异体。
Eur J Hum Genet. 2025 May;33(5):666-674. doi: 10.1038/s41431-025-01826-9. Epub 2025 Apr 1.
3
Tailoring the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology Guidelines for the Interpretation of Sequenced Variants in the Gene for Marfan Syndrome: Proposal for a Disease- and Gene-Specific Guideline.量身定制美国医学遗传学与基因组学学院和分子病理学协会关于马凡综合征基因中测序变异的解释指南:制定疾病和基因特异性指南的建议。
Circ Genom Precis Med. 2018 Jun;11(6):e002039. doi: 10.1161/CIRCGEN.117.002039.
4
Variability in gene-based knowledge impacts variant classification: an analysis of FBN1 missense variants in ClinVar.基于基因的知识的变异性会影响变异分类:ClinVar 中 FBN1 错义变异的分析。
Eur J Hum Genet. 2019 Oct;27(10):1550-1560. doi: 10.1038/s41431-019-0440-3. Epub 2019 Jun 21.
5
Interpretation and classification of FBN1 variants associated with Marfan syndrome: consensus recommendations from the Clinical Genome Resource's FBN1 variant curation expert panel.与马凡综合征相关的FBN1基因变异的解读与分类:临床基因组资源FBN1基因变异管理专家小组的共识建议
Genome Med. 2024 Dec 31;16(1):154. doi: 10.1186/s13073-024-01423-3.
6
Outcomes of 92 patient-driven family studies for reclassification of variants of uncertain significance.92 例患者驱动的家系研究对不确定意义变异分类再评估的结果。
Genet Med. 2019 Jun;21(6):1435-1442. doi: 10.1038/s41436-018-0335-7. Epub 2018 Oct 30.
7
Re-evaluation of a Fibrillin-1 Gene Variant of Uncertain Significance Using the ClinGen Guidelines.重新评估使用 ClinGen 指南的不确定意义的纤维连接蛋白 1 基因变异。
Ann Lab Med. 2024 May 1;44(3):271-278. doi: 10.3343/alm.2023.0152. Epub 2023 Oct 16.
8
Performance of ACMG-AMP Variant-Interpretation Guidelines among Nine Laboratories in the Clinical Sequencing Exploratory Research Consortium.临床测序探索性研究联盟中九个实验室对ACMG-AMP变异解读指南的执行情况。
Am J Hum Genet. 2016 Jun 2;98(6):1067-1076. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2016.03.024. Epub 2016 May 12.
9
Reinterpretation of BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants of uncertain significance in patients with hereditary breast/ovarian cancer using the ACMG/AMP 2015 guidelines.采用 ACMG/AMP 2015 指南重新解读遗传性乳腺癌/卵巢癌患者中意义未明的 BRCA1 和 BRCA2 变异。
Breast Cancer. 2019 Jul;26(4):510-519. doi: 10.1007/s12282-019-00951-w. Epub 2019 Feb 6.
10
Variant Classification Concordance using the ACMG-AMP Variant Interpretation Guidelines across Nine Genomic Implementation Research Studies.使用 ACMG-AMP 变异解释指南对九个基因组实施研究进行变异分类一致性评估。
Am J Hum Genet. 2020 Nov 5;107(5):932-941. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2020.09.011. Epub 2020 Oct 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Reassessment of FBN1 variants of uncertain significance using updated ClinGen guidance for PP1/BS4 and PP4 criteria.使用针对PP1/BS4和PP4标准的最新ClinGen指南重新评估意义未明的FBN1变异体。
Eur J Hum Genet. 2025 May;33(5):666-674. doi: 10.1038/s41431-025-01826-9. Epub 2025 Apr 1.
2
Variant reclassification and recontact research: A scoping review.变异重新分类与重新联系研究:一项范围综述。
Genet Med Open. 2024 Jul 11;2:101867. doi: 10.1016/j.gimo.2024.101867. eCollection 2024.
3
Genetic Landscape and Clinical Manifestations of Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia Type 1 in a Korean Cohort: A Multicenter Retrospective Analysis.
韩国队列中1型多发性内分泌腺瘤病的遗传特征和临床表现:一项多中心回顾性分析
Endocrinol Metab (Seoul). 2024 Dec;39(6):956-964. doi: 10.3803/EnM.2024.2008. Epub 2024 Nov 18.