• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

专家外科医生如何查看机器人手术视频:一项扎根理论研究。

How expert surgeons review robotic videos: A grounded theory study.

机构信息

College of Community Innovation and Education, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL, United States.

Surgical Health Outcomes Consortium (SHOC), AdventHealth Digestive Health Institute, Orlando, FL, United States.

出版信息

Am J Surg. 2023 Nov;226(5):709-716. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2023.07.043. Epub 2023 Aug 2.

DOI:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2023.07.043
PMID:37558519
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Surgical video review has been shown to improve technical skill in novice surgeons; however, to date, there are no studies examining the use of video review by experts. This study sought to understand the process expert robotic surgeons use when they review their surgical videos.

METHODS

In this qualitative pilot study, eight expert robotic colorectal surgeons individually participated in semi-structured interviews and video elicitation sessions. Grounded theory was used to develop a process model on how expert surgeons review their robotic videos.

RESULTS

The participants identified four categories of video review: critical incidents, unique cases, new techniques/procedures, and routine cases. They ask themselves questions with the primary goal of improving surgical technical skills. Surgeons compare their performance to benchmark videos and share videos for teaching and collaboration.

CONCLUSIONS

Expert robotic surgeons use video review for self-reflection and self-assessment. They recognize that improving surgical skills requires a growth mindset. These findings may contribute to the surgical education of novices.

摘要

背景

外科手术视频回顾已被证明可以提高新手外科医生的技术水平;然而,迄今为止,尚无研究检查专家使用视频回顾的情况。本研究旨在了解专家机器人外科医生在审查他们的手术视频时所使用的过程。

方法

在这项定性的初步研究中,8 名专家机器人结直肠外科医生分别参加了半结构式访谈和视频启发会议。扎根理论被用来开发一个关于专家外科医生如何审查他们的机器人视频的过程模型。

结果

参与者确定了视频审查的四个类别:关键事件、独特案例、新技术/程序和常规案例。他们问自己一些问题,主要目的是提高手术技术技能。外科医生将自己的表现与基准视频进行比较,并分享视频进行教学和协作。

结论

专家机器人外科医生使用视频回顾进行自我反思和自我评估。他们认识到,提高手术技能需要成长型思维。这些发现可能有助于新手的外科教育。

相似文献

1
How expert surgeons review robotic videos: A grounded theory study.专家外科医生如何查看机器人手术视频:一项扎根理论研究。
Am J Surg. 2023 Nov;226(5):709-716. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2023.07.043. Epub 2023 Aug 2.
2
Development and validation of a tool for non-technical skills evaluation in robotic surgery-the ICARS system.开发和验证一种用于机器人手术中非技术技能评估的工具——ICARS 系统。
Surg Endosc. 2017 Dec;31(12):5403-5410. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5622-x. Epub 2017 Jun 20.
3
Does Robotic Surgical Simulator Performance Correlate With Surgical Skill?机器人手术模拟器性能与手术技能相关吗?
J Surg Educ. 2017 Nov-Dec;74(6):1052-1056. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2017.05.011. Epub 2017 Jun 13.
4
Crowdsourcing: a valid alternative to expert evaluation of robotic surgery skills.众包:机器人手术技能专家评估的有效替代方法。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Nov;215(5):644.e1-644.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.06.033. Epub 2016 Jun 27.
5
Development of a technical checklist for the assessment of suturing in robotic surgery.开发用于评估机器人手术中缝合的技术检查表。
Surg Endosc. 2018 Nov;32(11):4402-4407. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6407-6. Epub 2018 Sep 7.
6
Medical Students Cannot Assess Robotic Surgeons Performing Radical Prostatectomy.医学生无法评估机器人外科医生施行根治性前列腺切除术的情况。
Simul Healthc. 2024 Aug 1;19(4):213-219. doi: 10.1097/SIH.0000000000000733.
7
A Novel Dissection Gesture Classification to Characterize Robotic Dissection Technique for Renal Hilar Dissection.一种新型的解剖手势分类方法,用于描述肾脏门部解剖的机器人解剖技术。
J Urol. 2021 Jan;205(1):271-275. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000001328. Epub 2020 Aug 18.
8
Evaluating Non-operative Robotic Skills in Colorectal Surgical Training.评估结直肠手术培训中的非手术机器人技能。
J Surg Res. 2021 Apr;260:391-398. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2020.11.007. Epub 2020 Nov 28.
9
Surgical Competency for Robot-Assisted Hysterectomy: Development and Validation of a Robotic Hysterectomy Assessment Score (RHAS).机器人辅助子宫切除术的手术能力:机器人子宫切除术评估评分(RHAS)的开发与验证
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2017 Jan 1;24(1):55-61. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2016.10.004. Epub 2016 Oct 22.
10
Quantifying the "Assistant Effect" in Robotic-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy (RARP): Measures of Technical Performance.量化机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术(RARP)中的“助手效应”:技术表现的度量。
J Surg Res. 2021 Apr;260:307-314. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2020.11.037. Epub 2020 Dec 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Cognitive ergonomics and robotic surgery.认知工效学与机器人手术。
J Robot Surg. 2024 Mar 5;18(1):110. doi: 10.1007/s11701-024-01852-7.