Social Psychology and Personality Psychology, School for Human and Social Sciences, University of Wuppertal, Gaußstraße 20, 42119, Wuppertal, Germany.
Arch Sex Behav. 2024 Jan;53(1):177-203. doi: 10.1007/s10508-023-02665-9. Epub 2023 Aug 9.
Sex differences in mating strategies and partner preferences are well established. However, most research solely focused on heterosexual women and men. We examined the mate selection, marriage, and age preferences of a sample of lesbian women, gay men, and bisexual women and men (LGB) who took part in an online dating survey. Additionally, we analyzed inter- and intrasexual differences in these preferences. A total of 710 participants rated the importance of 82 mate selection criteria and 10 marriage criteria, and they also indicated their age preferences and short-term and long-term relationship orientation. An exploratory factor analysis suggested 11 relevant domains of mate selection in the LGB sample, with sex, age, and long-term relationship orientation being relevant predictors of differences in these domains. We compared the LGB data with data collected from 21,245 heterosexual women and men on the same mate selection criteria. Results showed that the participants' sex was the most important predictor of differences in mate selection and marriage preferences, while intrasexual variables (sexual orientation and relationship orientation) explained only a small part of the variance. We incorporated the results into the current discussion about partner preferences and sexual orientation.
性策略和伴侣偏好的性别差异已得到充分证实。然而,大多数研究仅关注异性恋女性和男性。我们调查了参加在线约会调查的女同性恋者、男同性恋者和双性恋女性和男性(LGB)的择偶、婚姻和年龄偏好。此外,我们还分析了这些偏好的同性别和异性别差异。共有 710 名参与者对 82 项择偶标准和 10 项婚姻标准的重要性进行了评分,他们还表明了自己的年龄偏好以及短期和长期关系取向。探索性因素分析表明,LGB 样本中有 11 个相关的择偶领域,性别、年龄和长期关系取向是这些领域差异的相关预测因素。我们将 LGB 数据与从 21,245 名异性恋女性和男性收集的相同择偶标准数据进行了比较。结果表明,参与者的性别是择偶和婚姻偏好差异的最重要预测因素,而同性别变量(性取向和关系取向)仅解释了差异的一小部分。我们将结果纳入了关于伴侣偏好和性取向的当前讨论中。