Kee D W, Morris K, Bathurst K, Hellige J B
Brain Cogn. 1986 Jul;5(3):268-79. doi: 10.1016/0278-2626(86)90031-x.
Forty right-handed college subjects tapped with and without a verbal task under two instructional conditions (tap as quickly as possible vs. tap as consistently as possible) and two levels of verbal production (silent vs. aloud). The tapping task consisted of the alternate tapping of two keys with the index finger of the left vs. right hands, while the verbal task was anagram solution. Three rate and four variability measures of tapping performance were evaluated in the identification of lateralized interference. The results indicate that reliable lateralized interference, more right-hand than left-hand tapping disruption, was observed only for variability measures under instructions to tap as consistently as possible. Furthermore, only one of these variability measures was sensitive to an increase in lateralized interference produced by verbal production. Because of the limited demonstration of verbal laterality effects with the two-key tapping procedure in this study, conclusions suggest that the simpler manual task of repetitive tapping of one key should be viewed as the method of choice in future dual-task studies.
四十名惯用右手的大学生在两种指导条件下(尽可能快地敲击与尽可能稳定地敲击)以及两种言语产生水平(无声与出声)下,分别在有言语任务和无言语任务的情况下进行敲击。敲击任务包括用左手与右手食指交替敲击两个按键,而言语任务是解变位词。在确定侧向干扰时,评估了敲击表现的三个速率指标和四个变异性指标。结果表明,仅在尽可能稳定地敲击的指导下,对于变异性指标,观察到了可靠的侧向干扰,右手敲击的干扰比左手更多。此外,这些变异性指标中只有一个对言语产生所导致的侧向干扰增加敏感。由于本研究中使用两键敲击程序对言语侧向效应的证明有限,结论表明,在未来的双任务研究中,更简单的单键重复敲击手动任务应被视为首选方法。