• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

为电池耗尽的废弃经静脉起搏器的老年患者植入无导线起搏器。

Leadless pacemaker implantation in elderly patients with abandoned transvenous pacemakers with depleted batteries.

作者信息

Frick William, Chen Yongzhen, Zamora Lazarus, Osman Osama, Hussein Ahmed

机构信息

St. Louis University Hospital St. Louis Missouri USA.

出版信息

J Arrhythm. 2023 May 16;39(4):638-640. doi: 10.1002/joa3.12866. eCollection 2023 Aug.

DOI:10.1002/joa3.12866
PMID:37560280
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10407190/
Abstract

This spotlight article gives two clinical case examples for the implementation of a suggested safe and feasible strategy to implant leadless pacemakers instead of changing the generators of transvenous pacemakers with depleted batteries in elderly patients.

摘要

这篇重点文章给出了两个临床病例示例，用于实施一种建议的安全可行策略，即给老年患者植入无导线起搏器，而非更换电池耗尽的经静脉起搏器的发生器。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/090c/10407190/bac0f9aa7a8a/JOA3-39-638-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/090c/10407190/18ae37c3d024/JOA3-39-638-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/090c/10407190/bac0f9aa7a8a/JOA3-39-638-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/090c/10407190/18ae37c3d024/JOA3-39-638-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/090c/10407190/bac0f9aa7a8a/JOA3-39-638-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Leadless pacemaker implantation in elderly patients with abandoned transvenous pacemakers with depleted batteries.为电池耗尽的废弃经静脉起搏器的老年患者植入无导线起搏器。
J Arrhythm. 2023 May 16;39(4):638-640. doi: 10.1002/joa3.12866. eCollection 2023 Aug.
2
Utilizing Leadless Pacemakers in Extremely Elderly Patients With a Conventional Pacemaker System: A Two-Year Follow-Up Case Series Without Generator Extraction in High-Risk Scenarios.在患有传统起搏器系统的高龄患者中使用无导线起搏器：一项为期两年的随访病例系列研究，在高风险情况下未进行发生器拔除
Cureus. 2024 Aug 16;16(8):e67003. doi: 10.7759/cureus.67003. eCollection 2024 Aug.
3
Comparison of Patient Outcomes Between Leadless vs Transvenous Pacemakers Following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后无导线起搏器与经静脉起搏器患者结局的比较。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2024 Aug 12;17(15):1779-1791. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2024.05.030. Epub 2024 Jul 17.
4
Contemporaneous Comparison of Outcomes Among Patients Implanted With a Leadless vs Transvenous Single-Chamber Ventricular Pacemaker.同期比较无导线与经静脉单腔心室起搏器植入患者的结局。
JAMA Cardiol. 2021 Oct 1;6(10):1187-1195. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2021.2621.
5
Intracardiac leadless versus transvenous permanent pacemaker implantation: Impact on clinical outcomes and healthcare utilization.心内无导线与经静脉永久性起搏器植入术：对临床结局和医疗资源利用的影响。
J Cardiol. 2023 Nov;82(5):378-387. doi: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2023.05.001. Epub 2023 May 15.
6
Comparison of Safety of Leadless Pacemakers and Transvenous Pacemakers: A Meta-Analysis.无导线起搏器与经静脉起搏器安全性的比较：一项荟萃分析。
Cureus. 2023 Sep 12;15(9):e45086. doi: 10.7759/cureus.45086. eCollection 2023 Sep.
7
Synchronous atrioventricular sequential pacing utilizing conventional and leadless pacemakers in an elderly patient: a case report.一名老年患者使用传统起搏器和无导线起搏器进行同步房室顺序起搏：病例报告
Eur Heart J Case Rep. 2022 Dec 12;7(1):ytac474. doi: 10.1093/ehjcr/ytac474. eCollection 2023 Jan.
8
Efficacy and safety of leadless pacemaker: A systematic review, pooled analysis and meta-analysis.无导线起搏器的疗效与安全性：一项系统评价、汇总分析及Meta分析
Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J. 2022 Mar-Apr;22(2):77-86. doi: 10.1016/j.ipej.2021.12.001. Epub 2021 Dec 16.
9
Outcomes of leadless pacemaker implantation after cardiac surgery and transcatheter structural valve interventions.心脏手术后及经导管结构性瓣膜介入治疗后无导线起搏器植入的结果。
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2023 Nov;34(11):2216-2222. doi: 10.1111/jce.16074. Epub 2023 Sep 20.
10
Two-year outcomes of leadless vs. transvenous single-chamber ventricular pacemaker in high-risk subgroups.无导线与经静脉单腔心室起搏器在高危亚组中的两年结果。
Europace. 2023 Mar 30;25(3):1041-1050. doi: 10.1093/europace/euad016.

引用本文的文献

1
Utilizing Leadless Pacemakers in Extremely Elderly Patients With a Conventional Pacemaker System: A Two-Year Follow-Up Case Series Without Generator Extraction in High-Risk Scenarios.在患有传统起搏器系统的高龄患者中使用无导线起搏器：一项为期两年的随访病例系列研究，在高风险情况下未进行发生器拔除
Cureus. 2024 Aug 16;16(8):e67003. doi: 10.7759/cureus.67003. eCollection 2024 Aug.

本文引用的文献

1
End-of-service program compulsory ventricular pacing by the transvenous pacemaker remaining after implantation of a leadless pacemaker.无导线起搏器植入后，经静脉起搏器进行的服务终止程序强制性心室起搏。
HeartRhythm Case Rep. 2022 Jul 16;8(10):671-673. doi: 10.1016/j.hrcr.2022.07.008. eCollection 2022 Oct.
2
Assessing safety of leadless pacemaker (MICRA) at various implantation sites and its impact on paced QRS in Indian population.评估无导线起搏器 (MICRA) 在不同植入部位的安全性及其对印度人群起搏 QRS 的影响。
Indian Heart J. 2020 Sep-Oct;72(5):376-382. doi: 10.1016/j.ihj.2020.08.001. Epub 2020 Aug 10.
3
Adverse clinical events caused by pacemaker battery depletion: two case reports.
起搏器电池耗竭导致的不良临床事件：两例报告。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2020 Jul 23;20(1):344. doi: 10.1186/s12872-020-01622-x.
4
Safety of leadless pacemaker implantation in the very elderly.无导线起搏器在超高龄患者中的安全性。
Heart Rhythm. 2020 Dec;17(12):2023-2028. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2020.05.022. Epub 2020 May 23.
5
2018 ACC/AHA/HRS Guideline on the Evaluation and Management of Patients With Bradycardia and Cardiac Conduction Delay: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society.2018年美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会/心律学会关于心动过缓和心脏传导延迟患者评估与管理的指南：美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会临床实践指南工作组及心律学会的报告
Circulation. 2019 Aug 20;140(8):e382-e482. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000628. Epub 2018 Nov 6.
6
The Symptoms and Clinical events associated with Automatic Reprogramming (SCARE) at replacement notification study.更换通知研究中与自动重新编程相关的症状和临床事件（SCARE）
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2018 Dec;41(12):1611-1618. doi: 10.1111/pace.13532. Epub 2018 Nov 11.
7
Risk factors for cardiac implantable electronic device infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.心脏植入式电子设备感染的危险因素：一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Europace. 2015 May;17(5):767-77. doi: 10.1093/europace/euv053.