• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

解剖重建技术在机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术中对尿道周围结构的应用。

Application of anatomic reconstruction technique for periurethral structure in robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

作者信息

Li Haichang, Lu Dongning, Hu Yuning, Mou Yixuan, Zhang Dahong, Liu Zhenghong

机构信息

Urology & Nephrology Center, Department of Urology, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital (Affiliated People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College), Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.

出版信息

Front Oncol. 2023 Jul 25;13:1221217. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1221217. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.3389/fonc.2023.1221217
PMID:37560465
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10407552/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the outcome of patients underwent anatomic periurethral reconstruction during robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RARP).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

During August 2016 to May 2018, periurethral structure anatomic reconstruction was performed during RARP in 58 consecutive patients. The control group consists of another 50 patients had no reconstruction procedure during RARP. Perioperative data of these patients were collected retrospectively, including operation time, anastomosis time, intraoperative blood loss, duration of indwelling catheter, length of hospital stay, complications, postoperative pathology, and continence outcome at 1,3,6 and 12 months.

RESULTS

All cases were successfully performed without conversion to open or laparoscopic surgery. There were no major intraoperative or postoperative complications.The percentage of patients maintain continence in the reconstruction group versus non-reconstruction group: At 1 month 84.5% (49/58)versus 70.0% (35/50), at 3 months 89.7% (52/58)versus 78.0% (39/50), at 6 months 91.3% (53/58)versus 86.0% (43/50) and 1 year after surgery 100.0% (58/58)versus 96.0% (48/50). Reconstruction group showed better continence outcome in 1 and 3 months (P<0.05). There is no statistical differences in 6 month and 1 year.

CONCLUSION

Anatomic reconstruction of periurethral structure during RARP is safe and feasible with reduced duration of indwelling catheter and better continence outcome.

摘要

目的

探讨在机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术(RARP)期间进行尿道周围解剖重建的患者的预后。

材料与方法

2016年8月至2018年5月期间,连续58例患者在RARP期间进行了尿道周围结构解剖重建。对照组由另外50例在RARP期间未进行重建手术的患者组成。回顾性收集这些患者的围手术期数据,包括手术时间、吻合时间、术中出血量、留置导尿管时间、住院时间、并发症、术后病理以及术后1、3、6和12个月时的控尿结果。

结果

所有病例均成功完成,未转为开放手术或腹腔镜手术。术中及术后均无重大并发症。重建组与非重建组患者保持控尿的百分比:术后1个月时分别为84.5%(49/58)和70.0%(35/50),3个月时分别为89.7%(52/58)和78.0%(39/50),6个月时分别为91.3%(53/58)和86.0%(43/50),术后1年时分别为100.0%(58/58)和96.0%(48/50)。重建组在术后1个月和3个月时控尿结果更好(P<0.05)。6个月和1年时无统计学差异。

结论

RARP期间尿道周围结构的解剖重建是安全可行的,可缩短留置导尿管时间并获得更好的控尿结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a78f/10407552/b4a3f4d13229/fonc-13-1221217-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a78f/10407552/87d29b0440d8/fonc-13-1221217-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a78f/10407552/6d57fa123ed7/fonc-13-1221217-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a78f/10407552/6dc41ef4d075/fonc-13-1221217-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a78f/10407552/b4a3f4d13229/fonc-13-1221217-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a78f/10407552/87d29b0440d8/fonc-13-1221217-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a78f/10407552/6d57fa123ed7/fonc-13-1221217-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a78f/10407552/6dc41ef4d075/fonc-13-1221217-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a78f/10407552/b4a3f4d13229/fonc-13-1221217-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Application of anatomic reconstruction technique for periurethral structure in robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.解剖重建技术在机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术中对尿道周围结构的应用。
Front Oncol. 2023 Jul 25;13:1221217. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1221217. eCollection 2023.
2
Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy Using the Novel Urethral Fixation Technique Versus Standard Vesicourethral Anastomosis.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术采用新型尿道固定技术与标准膀胱尿道吻合术的比较。
Eur Urol. 2021 Apr;79(4):530-536. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2021.01.028. Epub 2021 Feb 4.
3
Advanced Reconstruction of Vesicourethral Support (ARVUS) during Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: One-year Functional Outcomes in a Two-group Randomised Controlled Trial.机器人辅助前列腺根治术中的高级膀胱尿道支撑重建(ARVUS):一项两臂随机对照试验的一年功能结局。
Eur Urol. 2017 May;71(5):822-830. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.05.032. Epub 2016 Jun 6.
4
[Comparison of initial results with robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open retropubic radical prostatectomy].机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术与开放性耻骨后根治性前列腺切除术的初步结果比较
Nihon Hinyokika Gakkai Zasshi. 2013 Sep;104(5):635-43. doi: 10.5980/jpnjurol.104.635.
5
Laparoscopic versus robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: an Australian single-surgeon series.腹腔镜与机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术:澳大利亚单中心单术者系列研究
ANZ J Surg. 2015 Mar;85(3):154-8. doi: 10.1111/ans.12602. Epub 2014 Apr 15.
6
Retzius-sparing Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy Leads to Durable Improvement in Urinary Function and Quality of Life Versus Standard Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy Without Compromise on Oncologic Efficacy: Single-surgeon Series and Step-by-step Guide.保留雷氏间隙的机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术与标准机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术相比,能持久改善排尿功能和生活质量,且不影响肿瘤疗效:单术者系列研究及分步指南
Eur Urol. 2021 Jun;79(6):839-857. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.05.010. Epub 2020 Jun 11.
7
Impact of Periurethral Inflammation on Continence Status Early After Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy.前列腺周围炎症对机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术后早期控尿状态的影响。
J Endourol. 2016 Nov;30(11):1207-1213. doi: 10.1089/end.2016.0301. Epub 2016 Oct 3.
8
[An evidence-based analysis comparing two approaches of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: the standard technique and Retzius-sparing technique].[一项基于证据的比较机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术两种方法的分析:标准技术和保留Retzius间隙技术]
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2021 Apr 20;101(15):1083-1087. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112137-20200902-02546.
9
Robotic-assisted Versus Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy: 12-month Outcomes of the Multicentre Randomised Controlled LAP-01 Trial.机器人辅助与腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术:多中心随机对照LAP-01试验的12个月结果
Eur Urol Focus. 2022 Nov;8(6):1583-1590. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2022.02.002. Epub 2022 Feb 23.
10
Total Anatomical Reconstruction During Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Implications on Early Recovery of Urinary Continence.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术中的全解剖重建:对早期尿控恢复的影响。
Eur Urol. 2016 Mar;69(3):485-95. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.08.005. Epub 2015 Aug 19.

本文引用的文献

1
Duration and Influencing Factors of Postoperative Urinary Incontinence after Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy in a Japanese Community Hospital: A Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study.在日本社区医院,机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术后尿失禁的持续时间和影响因素:一项单中心回顾性队列研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 24;20(5):4085. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20054085.
2
Modified apical dissection improves early continence in robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: Comparative study between modified apical dissection and anterior suspension stitch.改良尖部解剖术提高机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺根治术早期控尿效果:改良尖部解剖术与前悬带缝合术的比较研究。
Investig Clin Urol. 2022 Nov;63(6):639-646. doi: 10.4111/icu.20220235.
3
Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries.《全球癌症统计数据 2020:全球 185 个国家和地区 36 种癌症的发病率和死亡率估计》。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2021 May;71(3):209-249. doi: 10.3322/caac.21660. Epub 2021 Feb 4.
4
Prevention of Urethral Retraction with Stay Sutures (PURS) During Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy Improves Early Urinary Control: A Prospective Cohort Study.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术中使用留置缝线预防尿道退缩(PURS)可改善早期尿控:一项前瞻性队列研究。
J Endourol. 2018 Feb;32(2):125-132. doi: 10.1089/end.2017.0460. Epub 2017 Dec 22.
5
Patient-reported Functional Outcomes Following Open, Laparoscopic, and Robotic Assisted Radical Prostatectomy Performed by High-volume Surgeons at High-volume Hospitals.高容量医院的高年资外科医生进行开放、腹腔镜和机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术后患者报告的功能结局
Eur Urol Focus. 2016 Jun;2(2):172-179. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2015.06.011. Epub 2015 Jul 15.
6
Posterior musculofascial reconstruction after radical prostatectomy: an updated systematic review and a meta-analysis.前列腺癌根治术后的后肌筋膜重建:一项更新的系统评价和荟萃分析。
BJU Int. 2016 Jul;118(1):20-34. doi: 10.1111/bju.13480. Epub 2016 Apr 7.
7
Preservation of the neurovascular bundles is associated with improved time to continence after radical prostatectomy but not long-term continence rates: results of a systematic review and meta-analysis.保留神经血管束与根治性前列腺切除术后控尿时间的改善相关,但与长期控尿率无关:系统评价和荟萃分析的结果。
Eur Urol. 2015 Oct;68(4):692-704. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.10.020. Epub 2014 Oct 29.
8
Bladder neck preservation during classic laparoscopic radical prostatectomy - point of technique and preliminary results.经典腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术中膀胱颈保留——技术要点及初步结果
Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2012 Jun;7(2):89-95. doi: 10.5114/wiitm.2011.25981. Epub 2011 Nov 30.
9
Posterior muscolofascial reconstruction incorporated into urethrovescical anastomosis during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术中后肌筋膜重建与尿道膀胱吻合术的结合。
J Endourol. 2012 Dec;26(12):1542-5. doi: 10.1089/end.2012.0554. Epub 2012 Nov 19.
10
Patient and tumour-related factors for prediction of urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy.预测根治性前列腺切除术后尿失禁的患者及肿瘤相关因素。
Scand J Urol. 2013 Aug;47(4):272-81. doi: 10.3109/00365599.2012.733410. Epub 2012 Nov 9.