Suppr超能文献

肝硬化肝细胞癌监测中非对比简化磁共振成像的成本效用分析。

Cost-Utility Analysis of Non-Contrast Abbreviated Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Surveillance in Cirrhosis.

机构信息

Division of Academic Affairs, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.

Department of Tropical Hygiene, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.

出版信息

Gut Liver. 2024 Jan 15;18(1):135-146. doi: 10.5009/gnl230089. Epub 2023 Aug 10.

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Ultrasonography has a low sensitivity for detecting early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in cirrhotic patients. Non-contrast abbreviated magnetic resonance imaging (aMRI) demonstrated a comparable performance to that of magnetic resonance imaging without the risk of contrast media exposure and at a lower cost than that of full diagnostic MRI. We aimed to investigate the cost-effectiveness of non-contrast aMRI for HCC surveillance in cirrhotic patients, using ultrasonography with alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) as a reference.

METHODS

Cost-utility analysis was performed using a Markov model in Thailand and the United States. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were calculated using the total costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained in each strategy. Surveillance protocols were considered cost-effective based on a willingness-to-pay value of $4,665 (160,000 Thai Baht) in Thailand and $50,000 in the United States.

RESULTS

aMRI was cost-effective in both countries with incremental cost-effectiveness ratios of $3,667/QALY in Thailand and $37,062/QALY in the United States. Patient-level microsimulations showed consistent findings that aMRI was cost-effective in both countries. By probabilistic sensitivity analysis, aMRI was found to be more cost-effective than combined ultrasonography and AFP with a probability of 0.77 in Thailand and 0.98 in the United States. By sensitivity analyses, annual HCC incidence was revealed as the most influential factor affecting cost-effectiveness. The cost-effectiveness of aMRI increased in settings with a higher HCC incidence. At a higher HCC incidence, aMRI would remain cost-effective at a higher aMRI-to-ultrasonography with AFP cost ratio.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to ultrasonography with AFP, non-contrast aMRI is a cost-effective strategy for HCC surveillance and may be useful for such surveillance in cirrhotic patients, especially in those with high HCC risks.

摘要

背景/目的:超声检查对肝硬化患者早期肝细胞癌(HCC)的敏感性较低。无对比剂的磁共振成像(aMRI)与无对比剂磁共振成像的性能相当,且无对比剂暴露风险,成本也低于全诊断性磁共振成像。我们旨在研究无对比剂 aMRI 对 HCC 监测的成本效益,以超声检查联合甲胎蛋白(AFP)作为参考。

方法

在泰国和美国,采用 Markov 模型进行成本效用分析。使用每种策略的总费用和获得的质量调整生命年(QALY)计算增量成本效益比。在泰国,愿意支付 4665 美元(160000 泰铢),在美国,愿意支付 50000 美元,认为监测方案具有成本效益。

结果

在两国,aMRI 均具有成本效益,泰国的增量成本效益比为 3667 美元/QALY,美国为 37062 美元/QALY。患者水平的微观模拟结果表明,aMRI 在两国均具有成本效益。通过概率敏感性分析,aMRI 比联合超声检查和 AFP 更具成本效益,在泰国的概率为 0.77,在美国的概率为 0.98。通过敏感性分析发现,HCC 年发病率是影响成本效益的最主要因素。在 HCC 发病率较高的情况下,aMRI 的成本效益会增加。在 HCC 发病率较高的情况下,aMRI 相对于 AFP 的成本比越高,其成本效益就越高。

结论

与 AFP 联合超声检查相比,无对比剂 aMRI 是 HCC 监测的一种具有成本效益的策略,可能对肝硬化患者的 HCC 监测有用,尤其是 HCC 风险较高的患者。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e751/10791494/deb01197592f/gnl-18-1-135-f1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验