Division of Academic Affairs, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Department of Tropical Hygiene, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Gut Liver. 2024 Jan 15;18(1):135-146. doi: 10.5009/gnl230089. Epub 2023 Aug 10.
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Ultrasonography has a low sensitivity for detecting early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in cirrhotic patients. Non-contrast abbreviated magnetic resonance imaging (aMRI) demonstrated a comparable performance to that of magnetic resonance imaging without the risk of contrast media exposure and at a lower cost than that of full diagnostic MRI. We aimed to investigate the cost-effectiveness of non-contrast aMRI for HCC surveillance in cirrhotic patients, using ultrasonography with alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) as a reference.
Cost-utility analysis was performed using a Markov model in Thailand and the United States. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were calculated using the total costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained in each strategy. Surveillance protocols were considered cost-effective based on a willingness-to-pay value of $4,665 (160,000 Thai Baht) in Thailand and $50,000 in the United States.
aMRI was cost-effective in both countries with incremental cost-effectiveness ratios of $3,667/QALY in Thailand and $37,062/QALY in the United States. Patient-level microsimulations showed consistent findings that aMRI was cost-effective in both countries. By probabilistic sensitivity analysis, aMRI was found to be more cost-effective than combined ultrasonography and AFP with a probability of 0.77 in Thailand and 0.98 in the United States. By sensitivity analyses, annual HCC incidence was revealed as the most influential factor affecting cost-effectiveness. The cost-effectiveness of aMRI increased in settings with a higher HCC incidence. At a higher HCC incidence, aMRI would remain cost-effective at a higher aMRI-to-ultrasonography with AFP cost ratio.
Compared to ultrasonography with AFP, non-contrast aMRI is a cost-effective strategy for HCC surveillance and may be useful for such surveillance in cirrhotic patients, especially in those with high HCC risks.
背景/目的:超声检查对肝硬化患者早期肝细胞癌(HCC)的敏感性较低。无对比剂的磁共振成像(aMRI)与无对比剂磁共振成像的性能相当,且无对比剂暴露风险,成本也低于全诊断性磁共振成像。我们旨在研究无对比剂 aMRI 对 HCC 监测的成本效益,以超声检查联合甲胎蛋白(AFP)作为参考。
在泰国和美国,采用 Markov 模型进行成本效用分析。使用每种策略的总费用和获得的质量调整生命年(QALY)计算增量成本效益比。在泰国,愿意支付 4665 美元(160000 泰铢),在美国,愿意支付 50000 美元,认为监测方案具有成本效益。
在两国,aMRI 均具有成本效益,泰国的增量成本效益比为 3667 美元/QALY,美国为 37062 美元/QALY。患者水平的微观模拟结果表明,aMRI 在两国均具有成本效益。通过概率敏感性分析,aMRI 比联合超声检查和 AFP 更具成本效益,在泰国的概率为 0.77,在美国的概率为 0.98。通过敏感性分析发现,HCC 年发病率是影响成本效益的最主要因素。在 HCC 发病率较高的情况下,aMRI 的成本效益会增加。在 HCC 发病率较高的情况下,aMRI 相对于 AFP 的成本比越高,其成本效益就越高。
与 AFP 联合超声检查相比,无对比剂 aMRI 是 HCC 监测的一种具有成本效益的策略,可能对肝硬化患者的 HCC 监测有用,尤其是 HCC 风险较高的患者。