Department of Restorative Dentistry, State University of Ponta Grossa, Ponta Grossa, Brazil.
Department of Dental Clinical Sciences, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
J Esthet Restor Dent. 2023 Sep;35(6):968-979. doi: 10.1111/jerd.13107. Epub 2023 Aug 10.
To evaluate the accuracy of five brands of radiometers in reporting the irradiance (mW/cm ) from twelve brands of LCUs compared to a 'Gold Standard' (GS) reference obtained from a hand-held laboratory-grade radiometer.
The irradiance was measured from two examples of twelve brands of previously used LCUs on two examples of five brands of dental radiometers. The emission spectrum was also obtained. Irradiance data from each brand of LCU against each meter was analyzed using the Shapiro-Wilk test for normality. The irradiance values were subjected to a two-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni tests for each LCU brand. Finally, a descriptive analysis was made using a 95% confidence interval around the mean irradiance.
The power output from the LCUs ranged from 271 mW to 1005 mW. Among the tested radiometers, only the Bluephase Meter II could accurately report the irradiance from 11 out of the 12 brands of LCU evaluated in this study. When measured using the "GS" system, the mean irradiance values from the two examples of nine brands of previously used LCU were not always within ±10% of the irradiance values stated by the manufacturer.
The mean irradiance values from 9 of the 12 brands of used LCUs were beyond ±10% of the irradiance values stated by the manufacturer. Only the Bluephase Meter II could accurately report the irradiance from 11 out of the 12 brands of LCU evaluated in this study.
There was a wide range in the power output from the LCUs tested. It was impossible to accurately measure the irradiance from all the LCUs using the dental radiometers examined. However, dental radiometers should still be used in dental offices to monitor the light output from LCUs and verify that they are working correctly before they are used on patients.
评估五种品牌的辐射计在报告十二个品牌的光导器(mw/cm )辐照度时的准确性,与从手持式实验室级辐射计获得的“金标准”(GS)参考值进行比较。
从两个先前使用过的十二个品牌的光导器的两个示例中,在五个品牌的五个牙科辐射计的两个示例中测量辐照度。还获得了发射光谱。使用 Shapiro-Wilk 检验对每个光导器品牌的每个计数值进行正态性分析。对每个光导器品牌的辐照度值进行双因素方差分析,然后进行 Bonferroni 检验。最后,使用平均值周围 95%置信区间进行描述性分析。
光导器的功率输出范围为 271 mW 至 1005 mW。在所测试的辐射计中,只有 Bluephase Meter II 能够准确报告本研究评估的 12 个品牌的光导器中的 11 个的辐照度。使用“GS”系统测量时,两个先前使用过的九个品牌的光导器的两个示例的平均辐照度值并不总是在制造商规定的辐照度值的±10%以内。
在本研究评估的 12 个品牌的光导器中,有 9 个品牌的平均辐照度值超出了制造商规定的辐照度值的±10%。只有 Bluephase Meter II 能够准确报告本研究评估的 12 个品牌的光导器中的 11 个的辐照度。
所测试的光导器的功率输出范围很广。使用检查过的牙科辐射计不可能准确测量所有光导器的辐照度。但是,牙科辐射计仍应在牙科诊所中使用,以监测光导器的光输出,并在将其用于患者之前验证其正常工作。