University of New Hampshire.
Hist Psychol. 2023 Aug;26(3):279-281. doi: 10.1037/h0101918.
In the history of psychology, Rosalie Rayner is known as a research assistant to behaviorist John B. Watson in the study of a baby named Albert, coauthor of articles describing that research, and coauthor of . Rayner also wrote two magazine articles about her experience as a mother and the wife of Watson (Harris, 2014). Thanks to archivist James Stimpert, the author discovered that she was never a candidate for a graduate degree. In fall of 1919, she applied to take graduate classes at Hopkins and was accepted (Figure 1). However, she applied 2 weeks after classes had begun and never registered for any courses in the fall or spring semesters. Even more interesting, her application was approved by Watson on the same day she applied, which was a Saturday. The current author agrees with Romano-Lax and suggest that we appreciate Rayner's life and work without claiming her as a psychologist. While she deserves credit for her contributions to the Albert study and coauthored book on child care, her own voice is best heard when she looked beyond the field of psychology. In her 1932 article, "what future has motherhood?" she addressed the broader question of how the family could be restructured, which was being debated by feminists and other social reformers. While not consistently feminist, her perspective was dramatically different from her husband's. In Rayner Watson's view of the future, child care and other domestic work would be collectivized, as was being tried in the Soviet Union, freeing women for any activities they choose (Harris, 2014; R. R. Watson, 1932). Clearly, she had long left the laboratory, and her contributions should not be reduced to the "study of behavioral psychology" (Smirle, 2013). (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).
在心理学史上,罗莎莉·雷纳(Rosalie Rayner)作为行为主义者约翰·B·沃森(John B. Watson)研究婴儿阿尔伯特(Albert)的研究助理而闻名,她是描述该研究的文章的合著者,也是. 的合著者。雷纳还写了两篇关于她作为母亲和沃森妻子经历的杂志文章(哈里斯,2014 年)。多亏了档案管理员詹姆斯·斯蒂姆佩特(James Stimpert),作者发现她从未成为研究生学位的候选人。1919 年秋天,她申请在霍普金斯大学修读研究生课程并被录取(图 1)。然而,她在课程开始后两周申请,并且在秋季或春季学期都没有注册任何课程。更有趣的是,她的申请是在她申请的同一天由沃森批准的,而那是一个星期六。现任作者同意罗曼诺-拉克斯(Romano-Lax)的观点,即我们应该赞赏雷纳的生活和工作,而不是将她视为心理学家。虽然她因对阿尔伯特研究的贡献以及合著的育儿书籍而值得称赞,但当她超越心理学领域时,她自己的声音最为响亮。在她 1932 年的文章“母亲身份的未来如何?”中,她探讨了家庭如何进行重组的更广泛问题,当时女权主义者和其他社会改革者正在对此进行辩论。虽然她并不一直是女权主义者,但她的观点与她的丈夫截然不同。在雷纳·沃森(Rayner Watson)对未来的看法中,儿童保育和其他家务劳动将被集体化,就像苏联正在尝试的那样,使妇女能够从事她们选择的任何活动(哈里斯,2014 年;R. R. 沃森,1932 年)。显然,她早已离开了实验室,她的贡献不应仅限于“行为心理学研究”(斯米尔勒,2013 年)。(PsycInfo 数据库记录(c)2023 APA,保留所有权利)。