• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

切缘至浸润深度比:口腔癌患者生存的重要预测指标。

Margin to Depth of Invasion Ratio: A Significant Predictor of Survival in Patients With Oral Cancer.

机构信息

Department of Surgical Oncology, AIIMS Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.

Department of Radiation Oncology, AIIMS Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.

出版信息

JCO Glob Oncol. 2023 Aug;9:e2300144. doi: 10.1200/GO.23.00144.

DOI:10.1200/GO.23.00144
PMID:37561980
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10581600/
Abstract

PURPOSE

A common definition of a clear margin (≥5 mm) in oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) for all stages is a subject of controversy. Studies have shown that even 1- and 2-mm margins are adequate, and few studies have identified dynamic resection margin as a criterion. We aimed to study the margin to depth of invasion ratio (MDR), margin to tumor thickness ratio (MTR), and margin to tumor size ratio (MSR) as prognostic markers for survival. Notably, to our knowledge, this is the first study to evaluate the role of MDR in OSCC.

METHODS

A prospectively maintained head and neck cancer database was analyzed from January 2017 to February 2023. The MDR, MTR, and MSR were calculated for each patient. Survival outcomes were analyzed using the Cox proportional model and the Kaplan-Meier method. Akaike's information criterion (AIC) and Bayesian information criterion (BIC) were used to compare different ratio models. X-tiles software was used to identify the optimal cutoff value of MDR.

RESULTS

Two hundred eighty patients in the database were assessed, of which 123 eligible patients were enrolled in the study. MDR was an independent predictor of disease-free survival (DFS) on multivariate analysis. The MDR model had the lowest values on AIC and BIC analyses. A cutoff value of 0.5 for MDR showed a significant correlation with DFS and overall survival.

CONCLUSION

MDR was the best predictor of recurrence of all the three ratios studied. The minimum safe surgical margin can be calculated by multiplying the depth of invasion by 0.5. This study signifies the role of dynamic resection margin criteria on the basis of MDR in defining clear margins.

摘要

目的

对于所有阶段的口腔鳞状细胞癌(OSCC),一个常见的定义是清晰切缘(≥5mm),但这存在争议。研究表明,即使是 1-2mm 的切缘也是足够的,并且很少有研究将动态切缘作为标准。我们旨在研究切缘至浸润深度比(MDR)、切缘至肿瘤厚度比(MTR)和切缘至肿瘤大小比(MSR)作为生存的预后标志物。值得注意的是,据我们所知,这是第一项评估 MDR 在 OSCC 中的作用的研究。

方法

分析了 2017 年 1 月至 2023 年 2 月期间前瞻性维护的头颈部癌症数据库。计算了每位患者的 MDR、MTR 和 MSR。使用 Cox 比例模型和 Kaplan-Meier 方法分析生存结果。采用赤池信息量准则(AIC)和贝叶斯信息量准则(BIC)比较不同比模型。使用 X-tiles 软件确定 MDR 的最佳截断值。

结果

数据库中评估了 280 例患者,其中 123 例符合条件的患者被纳入研究。MDR 是多变量分析中无病生存(DFS)的独立预测因子。MDR 模型在 AIC 和 BIC 分析中的值最低。MDR 的截断值为 0.5 时与 DFS 和总生存显著相关。

结论

MDR 是所研究的三个比率中复发的最佳预测因子。最小安全手术切缘可通过将浸润深度乘以 0.5 来计算。这项研究基于 MDR 确定了动态切缘标准在定义清晰切缘中的作用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cb22/10581600/b81a742ee0f2/go-9-e2300144-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cb22/10581600/f67a77dcfd23/go-9-e2300144-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cb22/10581600/b81a742ee0f2/go-9-e2300144-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cb22/10581600/f67a77dcfd23/go-9-e2300144-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cb22/10581600/b81a742ee0f2/go-9-e2300144-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Margin to Depth of Invasion Ratio: A Significant Predictor of Survival in Patients With Oral Cancer.切缘至浸润深度比:口腔癌患者生存的重要预测指标。
JCO Glob Oncol. 2023 Aug;9:e2300144. doi: 10.1200/GO.23.00144.
2
Margin to tumor thickness ratio - A predictor of local recurrence and survival in oral squamous cell carcinoma.切缘与肿瘤厚度比值——口腔鳞状细胞癌局部复发和生存的预测指标
Oral Oncol. 2016 Apr;55:49-54. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2016.01.010. Epub 2016 Feb 6.
3
Log margin-to-thickness ratio improves disease-specific survival prediction in oral cancer: A single cancer centre database.切缘厚度比改善口腔癌的疾病特异性生存预测:单中心数据库研究。
Clin Otolaryngol. 2019 Jan;44(1):63-69. doi: 10.1111/coa.13237. Epub 2018 Oct 25.
4
Margin to depth of invasion ratio as an indicator for stratifying close margins in early-stage oral squamous cell carcinoma.切缘至浸润深度比作为评估早期口腔鳞状细胞癌切缘状态的指标。
Oral Oncol. 2024 Apr;151:106726. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2024.106726. Epub 2024 Feb 19.
5
The relevance of surgical margins in clinically early oral squamous cell carcinoma.手术切缘在临床早期口腔鳞状细胞癌中的相关性。
Oral Oncol. 2020 Nov;110:104913. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2020.104913. Epub 2020 Jul 22.
6
Impact of dysplastic surgical margins for patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma.口腔鳞状细胞癌患者的手术不典型边缘的影响。
Oral Oncol. 2019 Oct;97:1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2019.07.015. Epub 2019 Jul 31.
7
The influence of mild dysplasia at the surgical margin on the prognosis of oral squamous cell carcinoma.手术切缘轻度发育异常对口腔鳞状细胞癌预后的影响。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016 Nov;45(11):1372-1377. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2016.08.019. Epub 2016 Sep 27.
8
Independent Predictors of Prognosis Based on Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinoma Surgical Margins.基于口腔鳞状细胞癌手术切缘的预后独立预测因子。
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2018 Oct;159(4):675-682. doi: 10.1177/0194599818773070. Epub 2018 May 8.
9
Staging more important than grading? Evaluation of malignancy grading, depth of invasion, and resection margins in oral squamous cell carcinoma.分期比分级更重要?口腔鳞状细胞癌中恶性程度分级、浸润深度和切缘评估。
Clin Oral Investig. 2021 Mar;25(3):1169-1182. doi: 10.1007/s00784-020-03421-2. Epub 2020 Jun 29.
10
Association of Main Specimen and Tumor Bed Margin Status With Local Recurrence and Survival in Oral Cancer Surgery.口腔癌手术中主标本和肿瘤床切缘状态与局部复发和生存的关系。
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2016 Dec 1;142(12):1191-1198. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2016.2329.

引用本文的文献

1
The Cervical Lymph Node Positive Metastatic Probability Is a Significant Predictor of Survival for Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma-A Nationwide Study.颈淋巴结阳性转移概率是口腔鳞状细胞癌生存的重要预测指标——一项全国性研究
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Aug 20;17(16):2704. doi: 10.3390/cancers17162704.
2
Fluorescence Imaging-Assessed Surgical Margin Detection in Head and Neck Oncology by Passive and Active Targeting.通过被动和主动靶向的荧光成像评估头颈部肿瘤手术切缘
Mol Diagn Ther. 2025 May 8. doi: 10.1007/s40291-025-00781-x.
3
Risk Classification of Oral Cancer Surgical Margins: Margin to Depth of Invasion Ratio Analysis.

本文引用的文献

1
Surgical Extent for Oral Cancer: Emphasis on a Cut-Off Value for the Resection Margin Status: A Narrative Literature Review.口腔癌的手术范围:强调切缘状态的临界值:一篇叙述性文献综述
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Nov 21;14(22):5702. doi: 10.3390/cancers14225702.
2
Surgical margins of the oral cavity: is 5 mm really necessary?口腔手术切缘:5 毫米真的有必要吗?
J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2022 Oct 4;51(1):38. doi: 10.1186/s40463-022-00584-8.
3
Phase II Randomized Trial of Transoral Surgery and Low-Dose Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy in Resectable p16+ Locally Advanced Oropharynx Cancer: An ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group Trial (E3311).
口腔癌手术切缘的风险分类:切缘与浸润深度比值分析
Ann Surg Oncol. 2025 Apr 23. doi: 10.1245/s10434-025-17286-w.
4
Enhancing oral squamous cell carcinoma prediction: the prognostic power of the worst pattern of invasion and the limited impact of molecular resection margins.增强口腔鳞状细胞癌预测:侵袭最差模式的预后价值及分子切缘的有限影响
Front Oncol. 2023 Dec 22;13:1287650. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1287650. eCollection 2023.
可切除 p16+局部晚期口咽癌的经口手术联合低剂量调强放疗的 II 期随机试验:一项 ECOG-ACRIN 癌症研究组试验(E3311)。
J Clin Oncol. 2022 Jan 10;40(2):138-149. doi: 10.1200/JCO.21.01752. Epub 2021 Oct 26.
4
Adequate surgical margins for oral cancer: A Taiwan cancer registry national database analysis.口腔癌的充分手术切缘:台湾癌症登记全国数据库分析。
Oral Oncol. 2021 Aug;119:105358. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2021.105358. Epub 2021 May 26.
5
Tumor dimension-dependent microscopic extensions of hypopharyngeal cancer: Therapeutic implications for larynx-preserving hypopharyngectomy.下咽癌肿瘤尺寸相关的微观延伸:喉保留下咽切除术的治疗意义。
J Surg Oncol. 2021 Mar;123(4):872-880. doi: 10.1002/jso.26386. Epub 2021 Jan 26.
6
Optimum surgical margins in squamous cell carcinoma of the oral tongue: Is the current definition adequate?口腔舌鳞癌的最佳手术切缘:目前的定义是否足够?
Oral Oncol. 2020 Dec;111:104938. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2020.104938. Epub 2020 Jul 30.
7
The relevance of surgical margins in clinically early oral squamous cell carcinoma.手术切缘在临床早期口腔鳞状细胞癌中的相关性。
Oral Oncol. 2020 Nov;110:104913. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2020.104913. Epub 2020 Jul 22.
8
Magnetic Resonance vs. Intraoral Ultrasonography in the Preoperative Assessment of Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.磁共振成像与口腔内超声检查在口腔鳞状细胞癌术前评估中的比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Front Oncol. 2020 Feb 4;9:1571. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2019.01571. eCollection 2019.
9
Redefining adequate margins in oral squamous cell carcinoma: outcomes from close and positive margins.重新定义口腔鳞状细胞癌的充分切缘:切缘接近且为阳性时的结局。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2020 Apr;277(4):1155-1165. doi: 10.1007/s00405-019-05779-w. Epub 2020 Jan 2.
10
Cutaneous melanoma: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up†.皮肤黑色素瘤:ESMO 诊断、治疗及随访临床实践指南†
Ann Oncol. 2019 Dec 1;30(12):1884-1901. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdz411.