• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过回顾性倾向评分匹配分析评估可切除残胃癌中淋巴结比率的预后价值。

The value of lymph nodes ratios in the prognosis of resectable remnant gastric cancer through the retrospective propensity score matching analysis.

机构信息

Department of General Surgery, Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University/Naval Medical University, Shanghai, 200433, China.

Department of Emergency, Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University/Naval Medical University, Shanghai, 200433, China.

出版信息

World J Surg Oncol. 2023 Aug 11;21(1):245. doi: 10.1186/s12957-023-03137-z.

DOI:10.1186/s12957-023-03137-z
PMID:37563693
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10416507/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Currently, the characteristics and prognosis of remnant gastric cancer (RGC) are not fully understood yet. The present study aimed to describe the details of clinicopathological features of resectable RGC and investigated the factors affecting survival after the curative operation.

METHODS

From Jan. 2006 to Dec. 2015, a total of 118 resectable RGC patients (the RGC group) and 236 age-, sex- and TNM stages-matched resectable gastric cancer (GC) patients (the control group) were recruited retrospectively. Clinicopathological characteristics and overall survival were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

The overall survival rate was 46.61% for RGC patients compared to 55.08% for control groups (P < 0.01), and the mean overall survival time of RGC patients was 40.23 ± 32.27 months, compared to 55.06 ± 34.29 months in the control group (P = 0.023 after matching). The overall survival (OS) of RGC patients with stage IIb was much worse than IIa (P < 0.001) and similar to IIIa (P = 0.463) and IIIb (P = 0.014). Multivariate Cox proportional hazards model analysis revealed that TNM stage (HR: 3.899, P < 0.001) and lymph nodes ratio (LNR) (HR: 2.405, P = 0.028) were independent prognostic significance to OS.

CONCLUSIONS

The OS of RGC was much worse than GC with similar TNM stages, and LNR might consider a highly reliable indicator to evaluate the prognostic in RGC.

摘要

目的

目前,人们对残胃癌(RGC)的特征和预后尚不完全了解。本研究旨在描述可切除 RGC 的临床病理特征,并探讨影响根治性手术后生存的因素。

方法

回顾性分析 2006 年 1 月至 2015 年 12 月收治的 118 例可切除 RGC 患者(RGC 组)和 236 例年龄、性别和 TNM 分期匹配的可切除胃癌(GC)患者(对照组)的临床病理特征和总生存期。

结果

RGC 患者的总生存率为 46.61%,对照组为 55.08%(P<0.01),RGC 患者的平均总生存时间为 40.23±32.27 个月,对照组为 55.06±34.29 个月(匹配后 P=0.023)。RGC 患者的 IIb 期总生存(OS)明显差于 IIa 期(P<0.001),与 IIIa 期(P=0.463)和 IIIb 期(P=0.014)相似。多因素 Cox 比例风险模型分析显示,TNM 分期(HR:3.899,P<0.001)和淋巴结比率(LNR)(HR:2.405,P=0.028)是 OS 的独立预后因素。

结论

RGC 的 OS 明显差于具有相似 TNM 分期的 GC,LNR 可能是评估 RGC 预后的一个高度可靠指标。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/88df/10416507/26a94c255a15/12957_2023_3137_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/88df/10416507/99ce0aaec666/12957_2023_3137_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/88df/10416507/e0bbb9f6c845/12957_2023_3137_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/88df/10416507/fd17d8b1082d/12957_2023_3137_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/88df/10416507/26a94c255a15/12957_2023_3137_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/88df/10416507/99ce0aaec666/12957_2023_3137_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/88df/10416507/e0bbb9f6c845/12957_2023_3137_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/88df/10416507/fd17d8b1082d/12957_2023_3137_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/88df/10416507/26a94c255a15/12957_2023_3137_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
The value of lymph nodes ratios in the prognosis of resectable remnant gastric cancer through the retrospective propensity score matching analysis.通过回顾性倾向评分匹配分析评估可切除残胃癌中淋巴结比率的预后价值。
World J Surg Oncol. 2023 Aug 11;21(1):245. doi: 10.1186/s12957-023-03137-z.
2
Different prognostic effect of lymph node metastasis between remnant gastric cancers and primary proximal gastric cancers.残胃癌与原发性近端胃癌淋巴结转移的不同预后影响。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2024 Oct;28(10):1571-1577. doi: 10.1016/j.gassur.2024.06.026. Epub 2024 Jul 2.
3
Evaluation of Lymph Node Staging Systems as Independent Prognosticators in Remnant Gastric Cancer Patients with an Insufficient Number of Harvested Lymph Nodes.评估在淋巴结清扫数目不足的残胃癌患者中淋巴结分期系统作为独立预后因素的价值。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2021 May;28(5):2866-2876. doi: 10.1245/s10434-020-09433-2. Epub 2021 Jan 3.
4
Prognostic significance of metastatic lymph node ratio in patients with gastric cancer after curative gastrectomy: a single-center retrospective study.根治性胃切除术后胃癌患者淋巴结转移率的预后意义:一项单中心回顾性研究。
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2022 Jul;57(7):832-841. doi: 10.1080/00365521.2022.2036807. Epub 2022 Mar 16.
5
Positive lymph node ratio is an index in predicting prognosis for remnant gastric cancer with insufficient retrieved lymph node in R0 resection.阳性淋巴结比率是预测 R0 切除术后淋巴结不足的残胃癌预后的指标。
Sci Rep. 2021 Jan 21;11(1):2022. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-81663-0.
6
The prognostic value of lymph node ratio for local advanced gastric cancer patients with adjuvant chemoradiotherapy after D2 gastrectomy.D2胃切除术后接受辅助放化疗的局部进展期胃癌患者淋巴结比率的预后价值
Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Nov;97(44):e13079. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000013079.
7
Prognostic significance of metastatic lymph node ratio: the lymph node ratio could be a prognostic indicator for patients with gastric cancer.转移淋巴结比率的预后意义:淋巴结比率可作为胃癌患者的预后指标。
World J Surg Oncol. 2018 Oct 4;16(1):198. doi: 10.1186/s12957-018-1504-5.
8
T stage and venous invasion are crucial prognostic factors for long-term survival of patients with remnant gastric cancer: a cohort study.T 分期和静脉侵犯是残胃癌患者长期生存的关键预后因素:一项队列研究。
World J Surg Oncol. 2021 Sep 27;19(1):291. doi: 10.1186/s12957-021-02400-5.
9
[Prognostic value of a predictive model comprising preoperative inflammatory response and nutritional indexes in patients with gastric cancer].[包含术前炎症反应和营养指标的预测模型对胃癌患者的预后价值]
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2023 Jul 25;26(7):680-688. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn441530-20221018-00415.
10
Clinicopathological Features of Remnant Gastric Cancer After Gastrectomy.胃切除术后残胃癌的临床病理特征。
Am Surg. 2023 May;89(5):1381-1386. doi: 10.1177/00031348211056281. Epub 2021 Nov 19.

引用本文的文献

1
activates SLFN4MDSCs to accelerate gastric intestinal metaplasia.激活SLFN4 MDSCs以加速胃黏膜肠化生。
iScience. 2024 Oct 28;27(11):111255. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2024.111255. eCollection 2024 Nov 15.
2
Comparison of the predictive performance of three lymph node staging systems for late-onset gastric cancer patients after surgery.三种淋巴结分期系统对晚期胃癌患者术后预测性能的比较。
Front Surg. 2024 Jun 11;11:1376702. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2024.1376702. eCollection 2024.
3
Identification of prognostic signatures in remnant gastric cancer through an interpretable risk model based on machine learning: a multicenter cohort study.

本文引用的文献

1
Lymph node distribution in patients with remnant gastric cancer.残胃癌患者的淋巴结分布。
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2023 Jun;149(6):2367-2374. doi: 10.1007/s00432-022-04104-z. Epub 2022 Jun 21.
2
Role of New Anatomy, Biliopancreatic Reflux, and Helicobacter Pylori Status in Postgastrectomy Stump Cancer.新解剖学、胆胰反流和幽门螺杆菌状态在胃切除术后残端癌中的作用
J Clin Med. 2022 Mar 9;11(6):1498. doi: 10.3390/jcm11061498.
3
Short and long-term outcomes in a patient cohort with gastric stump cancer: A propensity score analysis.
基于机器学习的可解释风险模型识别残胃癌的预后特征:多中心队列研究。
BMC Cancer. 2024 Apr 30;24(1):547. doi: 10.1186/s12885-024-12303-9.
4
Using the geriatric nutritional risk index to predict outcomes in older patients with remnant gastric cancer after gastrectomy: a retrospective multicenter study in Japan.使用老年营养风险指数预测胃切除术后残胃老年患者的结局:日本的一项回顾性多中心研究。
Surg Today. 2024 Nov;54(11):1360-1368. doi: 10.1007/s00595-024-02850-w. Epub 2024 Apr 23.
5
Lymphovascular invasion is associated with poor long-term outcomes in patients with pT1N0-3 or pT2-3N0 remnant gastric cancer: a retrospective cohort study.脉管侵犯与 pT1N0-3 或 pT2-3N0 残胃癌患者的长期预后不良相关:一项回顾性队列研究。
World J Surg Oncol. 2024 Apr 5;22(1):86. doi: 10.1186/s12957-024-03371-z.
胃残端癌患者队列的短期和长期结局:一项倾向评分分析。
Asian J Surg. 2021 Jul;44(7):1027-1028. doi: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2021.03.018. Epub 2021 May 25.
4
Remnant gastric cancer: a neglected group with high potential for immunotherapy.残胃癌:一个被忽视但免疫治疗潜力巨大的群体。
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2020 Dec;146(12):3373-3383. doi: 10.1007/s00432-020-03322-7. Epub 2020 Jul 15.
5
Prognosis and clinicopathologic features in patients with gastric stump cancer after curative surgery.胃大部切除术后残胃癌患者的预后及临床病理特征。
Curr Oncol. 2020 Jun;27(3):e259-e264. doi: 10.3747/co.27.6017. Epub 2020 Jun 1.
6
Surgery for Gastric Remnant Cancer Results in Similar Overall Survival Rates Compared with Primary Gastric Cancer: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.胃残胃癌的手术治疗与原发性胃癌的总体生存率相当:一项倾向评分匹配分析。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2020 Oct;27(11):4196-4203. doi: 10.1245/s10434-020-08669-2. Epub 2020 Jun 2.
7
Prevalence and characteristics of gastric remnant cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.胃残胃癌的流行率和特征:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Asian J Surg. 2021 Jan;44(1):11-17. doi: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2020.03.012. Epub 2020 Apr 3.
8
[Interpretation on Chinese surgeons' consensus opinion for the definition of gastric stump cancer (version 2018)].《中国外科医生关于胃残端癌定义的专家共识解读(2018版)》
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2018 May 25;21(5):486-490.
9
Clinicopathological characteristics and prognostic factors of remnant gastric cancer: A single-center retrospective analysis of 90 patients.残胃癌的临床病理特征及预后因素:单中心回顾性分析 90 例患者
Int J Surg. 2018 Mar;51:97-103. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.01.019. Epub 2018 Jan 31.
10
Carcinoma in the Remnant Stomach During Long-Term Follow-up After Distal Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: Analysis of Cumulative Incidence and Associated Risk Factors.胃癌远端胃切除术后长期随访期间残胃癌的累积发病率及相关危险因素分析
World J Surg. 2018 Mar;42(3):782-787. doi: 10.1007/s00268-017-4227-9.