Analysis Group, Inc, Montréal, QC, Canada.
Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC, Horsham, PA, USA.
Curr Med Res Opin. 2023 Sep;39(9):1215-1225. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2023.2246882. Epub 2023 Aug 26.
To estimate long-term persistence among bio-naïve patients with CD initiated on ustekinumab or adalimumab.
Adults with CD initiating ustekinumab or adalimumab (index date, between September 23, 2016 and August 1, 2019) were sampled from the IBM MarketScan Commercial Database. Patients without CD-indicated biologics (bio-naïve) and with no diagnoses for other autoimmune diseases 12 months pre-index date (baseline) were included. Cohorts were balanced on baseline characteristics with inverse probability of treatment weighting. Persistence was defined as the absence of therapy exposure gaps >120 days (ustekinumab) or >60 (adalimumab) between days of supply. Composite endpoints were persistence and being corticosteroid-free (no corticosteroids >14 days of supply after day 90 post-index) and persistence while on monotherapy (no immunomodulators/non-index biologics). Persistence was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox's models.
Ustekinumab and adalimumab cohorts included 671 and 2,975 patients. At 12 months post-index, ustekinumab patients were significantly more persistent (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.60; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.33-1.93), persistent while on monotherapy (HR = 1.43; 95% CI = 1.24-1.65), and trended toward being more persistent and corticosteroid-free (HR = 1.14; 95% CI = 0.99-1.30) vs adalimumab. At 24 months post-index, ustekinumab patients were significantly more persistent (HR = 1.66; 95% CI = 1.40-1.97), persistent while on monotherapy (HR = 1.44; 95% CI = 1.26-1.64), and persistent and corticosteroid-free (HR = 1.15; 95% CI = 1.01-1.31) vs adalimumab.
Bio-naïve patients with CD initiated on ustekinumab demonstrated significantly more persistence than patients initiated on adalimumab at 12 and 24 months of treatment. Long-term persistence is a measure of a drug's real-world performance and findings may aid clinical decision-making.
评估在接受乌司奴单抗或阿达木单抗治疗的初治 CD 患者中的长期持续缓解情况。
从 IBM MarketScan 商业数据库中抽取在 2016 年 9 月 23 日至 2019 年 8 月 1 日期间开始接受乌司奴单抗或阿达木单抗治疗的初治 CD 成年患者。纳入无 CD 指征的生物制剂(初治)且在基线前 12 个月内无其他自身免疫性疾病诊断的患者。通过逆概率治疗加权法对基线特征进行了平衡。将无治疗间隙>120 天(乌司奴单抗)或>60 天(阿达木单抗)的天数作为持续缓解的定义。复合终点包括持续缓解和无皮质类固醇(索引后第 90 天起 14 天以上无皮质类固醇供应)以及单药治疗时的持续缓解(无免疫调节剂/非索引生物制剂)。采用 Kaplan-Meier 和 Cox 模型分析缓解持续时间。
乌司奴单抗和阿达木单抗队列分别纳入了 671 例和 2975 例患者。在索引后 12 个月时,乌司奴单抗治疗患者的持续缓解率显著更高(风险比 [HR] = 1.60;95%置信区间 [CI] = 1.33-1.93)、单药治疗时的持续缓解率更高(HR = 1.43;95% CI = 1.24-1.65),且更倾向于持续缓解和无皮质类固醇(HR = 1.14;95% CI = 0.99-1.30)。在索引后 24 个月时,乌司奴单抗治疗患者的持续缓解率显著更高(HR = 1.66;95% CI = 1.40-1.97)、单药治疗时的持续缓解率更高(HR = 1.44;95% CI = 1.26-1.64)、持续缓解和无皮质类固醇(HR = 1.15;95% CI = 1.01-1.31)。
在 CD 初治患者中,与阿达木单抗相比,乌司奴单抗治疗患者在 12 和 24 个月时的缓解持续时间明显更长。长期缓解持续时间是药物真实世界表现的衡量标准,其发现可能有助于临床决策。