Leitão André Luiz Alberti, Fonda Uysha de Souza, Buchpiguel Carlos Alberto, Willegaignon José, Sapienza Marcelo Tatit
Centers for Radiology and Nuclear Medicine - Centro Médico, Brasília, DF, Brazil.
Hospital das Clínicas - Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (HC-FMUSP), São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Radiol Bras. 2023 May-Jun;56(3):137-144. doi: 10.1590/0100-3984.2022.0096.
To develop an automated co-registration system and test its performance, with and without a fiducial marker, on single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) images.
Three SPECT/CT scans were acquired for each rotation of a Jaszczak phantom (to 0°, 5°, and 10° in relation to the bed axis), with and without a fiducial marker. Two rigid co-registration software packages-SPM12 and NMDose-coreg-were employed, and the percent root mean square error (%RMSE) was calculated in order to assess the quality of the co-registrations. Uniformity, contrast, and resolution were measured before and after co-registration. The NMDose-coreg software was employed to calculate the renal doses in 12 patients treated with Lu-DOTATATE, and we compared those with the values obtained with the Organ Level INternal Dose Assessment for EXponential Modeling (OLINDA/EXM) software.
The use of a fiducial marker had no significant effect on the quality of co-registration on SPECT images, as measured by %RMSE ( = 0.40). After co-registration, uniformity, contrast, and resolution did not differ between the images acquired with fiducial markers and those acquired without. Preliminary clinical application showed mean total processing times of 9 ± 3 min/patient for NMDose-coreg and 64 ± 10 min/patient for OLINDA/EXM, with a strong correlation between the two, despite the lower renal doses obtained with NMDose-coreg.
The use of NMDose-coreg allows fast co-registration of SPECT images, with no loss of uniformity, contrast, or resolution. The use of a fiducial marker does not appear to increase the accuracy of co-registration on phantoms.
开发一种自动配准系统,并在单光子发射计算机断层扫描(SPECT)图像上测试其在有无基准标记情况下的性能。
对Jaszczak体模的每次旋转(相对于床轴旋转至0°、5°和10°)进行三次SPECT/CT扫描,分别有无基准标记。使用了两个刚性配准软件包——SPM12和NMDose-coreg,并计算均方根误差百分比(%RMSE)以评估配准质量。在配准前后测量均匀性、对比度和分辨率。使用NMDose-coreg软件计算12例接受Lu-DOTATATE治疗患者的肾脏剂量,并将其与使用指数模型器官水平内部剂量评估(OLINDA/EXM)软件获得的值进行比较。
通过%RMSE测量,基准标记的使用对SPECT图像的配准质量没有显著影响(=0.40)。配准后,使用基准标记获取的图像与未使用基准标记获取的图像在均匀性、对比度和分辨率方面没有差异。初步临床应用显示,NMDose-coreg的平均总处理时间为9±3分钟/患者,OLINDA/EXM为64±10分钟/患者,尽管NMDose-coreg获得的肾脏剂量较低,但两者之间具有很强的相关性。
使用NMDose-coreg可实现SPECT图像的快速配准,且不会损失均匀性、对比度或分辨率。基准标记的使用似乎不会提高体模配准的准确性。