Kurbatfinski Nikola, Kramer Cameron N, Goodman Steven D, Bakaletz Lauren O
Center for Microbial Pathogenesis, Abigail Wexner Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH, United States.
Department of Pediatrics, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, United States.
Front Microbiol. 2023 Jul 26;14:1202215. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1202215. eCollection 2023.
The "silent" antimicrobial resistance (AMR) pandemic is responsible for nearly five million deaths annually, with a group of seven biofilm-forming pathogens, known as the ESKAPEE pathogens, responsible for 70% of these fatalities. Biofilm-resident bacteria, as they exist within the disease site, are canonically highly resistant to antibiotics. One strategy to counter AMR and improve disease resolution involves developing methods to disrupt biofilms. These methods aim to release bacteria from the protective biofilm matrix to facilitate their killing by antibiotics or immune effectors. Several laboratories working on such strategies have demonstrated that bacteria newly released from a biofilm display a transient phenotype of significantly increased susceptibility to antibiotics. Similarly, we developed an antibody-based approach for biofilm disruption directed against the two-membered DNABII family of bacterial DNA-binding proteins, which serve as linchpins to stabilize the biofilm matrix. The incubation of biofilms with α-DNABII antibodies rapidly collapses them to induce a population of newly released bacteria (NRel).
In this study, we used a humanized monoclonal antibody (HuTipMab) directed against protective epitopes of a DNABII protein to determine if we could disrupt biofilms formed by the high-priority ESKAPEE pathogens as visualized by confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) and COMSTAT2 analysis. Then, we demonstrated the potentiated killing of the induced NRel by seven diverse classes of traditional antibiotics by comparative plate count.
To this end, ESKAPEE biofilms were disrupted by 50%-79% using a single tested dose and treatment period with HuTipMab. The NRel of each biofilm were significantly more sensitive to killing than their planktonically grown counterparts (heretofore, considered to be the most sensitive to antibiotic-mediated killing), even when tested at a fraction of the MIC (1/250-1/2 MIC). Moreover, the bacteria that remained within the biofilms of two representative ESKAPEE pathogens after HuTipMab disruption were also significantly more susceptible to killing by antibiotics.
New data presented in this study support our continued development of a combinatorial therapy wherein HuTipMab is delivered to a patient with recalcitrant disease due to an ESKAPEE pathogen to disrupt a pathogenic biofilm, along with a co-delivered dose of an antibiotic whose ability to rapidly kill the induced NRel has been demonstrated. This novel regimen could provide a more successful clinical outcome to those with chronic, recurrent, or recalcitrant diseases, while limiting further contribution to AMR.
“无声的”抗菌药物耐药性(AMR)大流行每年导致近500万人死亡,一组被称为ESKAPEE病原体的七种形成生物膜的病原体导致了其中70%的死亡。疾病部位存在的生物膜内细菌通常对抗生素具有高度耐药性。对抗AMR并改善疾病解决的一种策略是开发破坏生物膜的方法。这些方法旨在将细菌从保护性生物膜基质中释放出来,以促进抗生素或免疫效应器对它们的杀灭。致力于此类策略的几个实验室已经证明,从生物膜中新释放的细菌表现出对抗生素敏感性显著增加的短暂表型。同样,我们开发了一种基于抗体的生物膜破坏方法,该方法针对细菌DNA结合蛋白的二元DNABII家族,该家族作为稳定生物膜基质的关键因素。用α-DNABII抗体孵育生物膜会使其迅速瓦解,从而诱导产生一群新释放的细菌(NRel)。
在本研究中,我们使用了一种针对DNABII蛋白保护性表位的人源化单克隆抗体(HuTipMab),以确定我们是否能够破坏由高优先级ESKAPEE病原体形成的生物膜,这通过共聚焦激光扫描显微镜(CLSM)和COMSTAT2分析进行可视化。然后,我们通过比较平板计数证明了七种不同类别的传统抗生素对诱导产生的NRel的增强杀灭作用。
为此,使用单一测试剂量和治疗期的HuTipMab可使ESKAPEE生物膜被破坏50%-79%。每个生物膜的NRel比其浮游生长的对应物对杀灭更敏感(此前认为浮游生长的对应物对抗生素介导的杀灭最敏感),即使在MIC的一小部分(1/250-1/2 MIC)下进行测试也是如此。此外,HuTipMab破坏后,两种代表性ESKAPEE病原体生物膜中残留的细菌对抗生素杀灭也明显更敏感。
本研究中提出的新数据支持我们继续开发一种联合疗法,其中将HuTipMab输送给因ESKAPEE病原体导致顽固性疾病的患者,以破坏致病生物膜,同时共同输送一定剂量的抗生素,其快速杀灭诱导产生的NRel的能力已得到证明。这种新方案可以为患有慢性、复发性或顽固性疾病的患者提供更成功的临床结果,同时限制对AMR的进一步影响。