• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Trends in non-operative management of low-energy pelvic fracture: An analysis of the Nationwide Inpatient Sample.低能量骨盆骨折非手术治疗的趋势:基于全国住院患者样本的分析
J Orthop. 2023 Jul 28;43:101-108. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2023.07.028. eCollection 2023 Sep.
2
Type II odontoid fractures in the elderly presenting to the emergency department: an assessment of factors affecting in-hospital mortality and discharge to skilled nursing facilities.老年型 II 型齿状突骨折患者就诊于急诊科:评估影响住院死亡率和转移至熟练护理机构的因素。
Spine J. 2024 Apr;24(4):682-691. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2023.11.023. Epub 2023 Dec 14.
3
Operative versus nonoperative treatment of geriatric ankle fractures: a Medicare Part A claims database analysis.老年踝关节骨折的手术治疗与非手术治疗:一项医疗保险A部分索赔数据库分析
Foot Ankle Int. 2015 Jun;36(6):648-55. doi: 10.1177/1071100715573707. Epub 2015 Feb 24.
4
National trends of incidence, treatment, and hospital charges of isolated C-2 fractures in three different age groups.三个不同年龄组孤立性C-2骨折的发病率、治疗情况及住院费用的全国趋势。
Neurosurg Focus. 2015 Apr;38(4):E19. doi: 10.3171/2015.1.FOCUS14825.
5
Variation in Resource Utilization for Patients With Hip and Pelvic Fractures Despite Equal Medicare Reimbursement.尽管医疗保险报销相同,但髋部和骨盆骨折患者的资源利用情况仍存在差异。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 Jun;474(6):1486-94. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-4765-8. Epub 2016 Feb 25.
6
A Nationwide Analysis of Geriatric Odontoid Fracture Incidence, Complications, Mortality, and Cost.一项全国范围内老年型齿状突骨折发病率、并发症、死亡率和费用的分析。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2021 Jan 15;46(2):131-137. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003734.
7
Demographic epidemiology of unstable pelvic fracture in the United States from 2000 to 2009: trends and in-hospital mortality.2000 年至 2009 年美国不稳定骨盆骨折的人口流行病学:趋势和住院死亡率。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2014 Feb;76(2):380-5. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3182ab0cde.
8
Impact of associated injuries in conjunction with fracture of the axis vertebra on inpatient outcomes and postoperative complications: a Nationwide Inpatient Sample analysis from 2002 to 2011.枢椎骨折合并相关损伤对住院患者结局及术后并发症的影响:一项2002年至2011年全国住院患者样本分析
Spine J. 2016 Apr;16(4):491-503. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2015.12.006. Epub 2015 Dec 14.
9
Utilization of DXA Bone Mineral Densitometry in Ontario: An Evidence-Based Analysis.安大略省双能X线吸收法骨密度测定的应用:基于证据的分析。
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2006;6(20):1-180. Epub 2006 Nov 1.
10
Discharge dispositions, complications, and costs of hospitalization in spinal cord tumor surgery: analysis of data from the United States Nationwide Inpatient Sample, 2003-2010.脊髓肿瘤手术住院患者的出院转归、并发症和住院费用:对 2003-2010 年美国全国住院患者样本数据的分析。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2014 Feb;20(2):125-41. doi: 10.3171/2013.9.SPINE13274. Epub 2013 Nov 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Anterior internal versus external fixation of unstable pelvis fractures was not associated with discharge destination, critical care, length of stay, or hospital charges.不稳定骨盆骨折的前内固定与外固定与出院去向、重症监护、住院时间或住院费用无关。
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2024 Jul;34(5):2773-2778. doi: 10.1007/s00590-024-03985-9. Epub 2024 May 21.
2
Arterial angioembolisation versus pre-peritoneal pelvic packing in haemodynamically unstable patients with complex pelvic fractures: a meta-analysis.动脉血管栓塞术与前腹膜外骨盆填塞治疗血流动力学不稳定的复杂骨盆骨折患者:荟萃分析。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2024 Aug;50(4):1295-1304. doi: 10.1007/s00068-023-02389-4. Epub 2023 Nov 14.

本文引用的文献

1
Lateral compression type 1 (LC1) pelvic ring injuries: a spectrum of fracture types and treatment algorithms.外侧挤压型 1 (LC1)骨盆环损伤:一系列骨折类型和治疗算法。
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2021 Jul;31(5):841-854. doi: 10.1007/s00590-021-02935-z. Epub 2021 Apr 16.
2
Health care utilization and excess costs after pelvic fractures among older people in Germany.德国老年人骨盆骨折后的医疗保健利用情况及额外费用
Osteoporos Int. 2021 Oct;32(10):2061-2072. doi: 10.1007/s00198-021-05935-1. Epub 2021 Apr 10.
3
Sedentary Lifestyle: Overview of Updated Evidence of Potential Health Risks.久坐不动的生活方式:潜在健康风险的最新证据概述
Korean J Fam Med. 2020 Nov;41(6):365-373. doi: 10.4082/kjfm.20.0165. Epub 2020 Nov 19.
4
Guidelines for the prevention of venous thromboembolism in hospitalized patients with pelvi-acetabular trauma.骨盆髋臼创伤住院患者静脉血栓栓塞症预防指南。
J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2020 Nov-Dec;11(6):1002-1008. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2020.09.011. Epub 2020 Sep 16.
5
Low-Energy Pelvic Ring Fractures in the Elderly Population: Expected Outcomes and Associated Mortality Rates.老年人群中的低能量骨盆环骨折:预期结果及相关死亡率
J Clin Med Res. 2019 Nov;11(11):725-728. doi: 10.14740/jocmr3891. Epub 2019 Oct 29.
6
Early Operative Versus Nonoperative Treatment of Fragility Fractures of the Pelvis: A Propensity-Matched Multicenter Study.早期手术与非手术治疗骨盆脆弱性骨折:一项倾向匹配的多中心研究。
J Orthop Trauma. 2019 Nov;33(11):e410-e415. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000001584.
7
Trends in Sedentary Behavior Among the US Population, 2001-2016.2001-2016 年美国人口久坐行为趋势。
JAMA. 2019 Apr 23;321(16):1587-1597. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.3636.
8
Venous thromboembolism after hospital discharge in pelvic and acetabular fracture patients treated operatively.手术治疗的骨盆和髋臼骨折患者出院后发生静脉血栓栓塞症。
J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2019 Jan-Apr;27(1):2309499019832815. doi: 10.1177/2309499019832815.
9
A cost minimization analysis comparing minimally-invasive with open reduction surgical techniques for pelvic ring fracture.一项比较骨盆环骨折微创与切开复位手术技术的成本最小化分析。
Exp Ther Med. 2019 Mar;17(3):1802-1812. doi: 10.3892/etm.2019.7151. Epub 2019 Jan 4.
10
Open pelvic fracture: the killing fracture?开放性骨盆骨折:致命骨折?
J Orthop Surg Res. 2018 Apr 13;13(1):83. doi: 10.1186/s13018-018-0793-2.

低能量骨盆骨折非手术治疗的趋势:基于全国住院患者样本的分析

Trends in non-operative management of low-energy pelvic fracture: An analysis of the Nationwide Inpatient Sample.

作者信息

Farid Alexander R, Stearns Stephen A, Atarere Joseph Okiemute, Suneja Nishant, Weaver Michael J, Von Keudell Arvind Gabriel

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.

Department of Orthopaedic Trauma, Bispebjerg hospitalet, University of Copenhagen, 2400, Copenhagen, Denmark.

出版信息

J Orthop. 2023 Jul 28;43:101-108. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2023.07.028. eCollection 2023 Sep.

DOI:10.1016/j.jor.2023.07.028
PMID:37564706
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10410464/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Non-operative management is common for low-impact pelvic fractures. In this study, we characterize the epidemiology of those treated nonoperatively following low-energy pelvic fracture, while identifying recent management trends.

METHODOLOGY

Data from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) database from 2011 to 2018 were analyzed. We identified adult patients diagnosed with pelvic fracture based on International Classification of Diseases (ICD) codes, excluding fractures of the acetabulum, femur, polytrauma, and open fractures to isolate cases caused by low-impact mechanisms. Codes indicating operative management were excluded. Demographic information and outcomes (length of stay, in-hospital mortality, hospital discharge status) were collected. Sub-analyses were performed to identify trends.

FINDINGS

123,936 eligible patients were identified. The average age was 68.7 years. 70% were female, showing a decline from 75% to 66% over the study period. Pubic bone involvement was observed in 59% of fractures. The mean Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) was 3.83, corresponding to a 10-year survival rate of 58.5%, which remained relatively stable throughout the study period. 62.4% of patients received treatment at urban teaching hospitals. Average length of hospital stay was 6.3 days. Discharge to a skilled nursing facility (SNF) was the most common outcome, ranging from 62.1% to 65.0% during the study period, while 20.0% of patients were discharged home (18.4%-21.1%). Mean in-hospital mortality was 3.28%, showing no significant change, with higher rates among male patients (5.1%) and patients of Asian descent (3.8%).

CONCLUSION

The majority of patients receiving nonoperative treatment for low-energy pelvic fractures were females in their mid-60s with moderate comorbidity. The study reveals a relatively high in-hospital mortality rate of 3.28%, particularly among male patients and those of Asian descent, indicating the need for increased surveillance for further injury in these groups. Most patients were discharged to a SNF, highlighting the necessity for extended rehabilitation in this population. This persistent trend is noteworthy considering the growing emphasis on the cost of inpatient admissions and advancements in outpatient management of orthopedic injuries.

摘要

引言

非手术治疗是低暴力骨盆骨折的常见治疗方式。在本研究中,我们描述了低能量骨盆骨折非手术治疗患者的流行病学特征,同时确定了近期的治疗趋势。

方法

分析了2011年至2018年全国住院患者样本(NIS)数据库中的数据。我们根据国际疾病分类(ICD)编码确定诊断为骨盆骨折的成年患者,排除髋臼骨折、股骨骨折、多发伤和开放性骨折,以分离低暴力机制导致的病例。排除表明手术治疗的编码。收集人口统计学信息和结局(住院时间、院内死亡率、出院状态)。进行亚分析以确定趋势。

结果

共确定123936例符合条件的患者。平均年龄为68.7岁。70%为女性,在研究期间从75%降至66%。59%的骨折累及耻骨。平均查尔森合并症指数(CCI)为3.83,对应10年生存率为58.5%,在整个研究期间保持相对稳定。62.4%的患者在城市教学医院接受治疗。平均住院时间为6.3天。出院至熟练护理机构(SNF)是最常见的结局,在研究期间为62.1%至65.0%,而20.0%的患者出院回家(18.4% - 21.1%)。平均院内死亡率为3.28%,无显著变化,男性患者(5.1%)和亚裔患者(3.8%)死亡率较高。

结论

大多数接受低能量骨盆骨折非手术治疗的患者为60多岁的女性,合并症中等。该研究显示院内死亡率相对较高,为3.28%,特别是男性患者和亚裔患者,表明需要加强对这些人群进一步损伤的监测。大多数患者出院至SNF,突出了该人群延长康复的必要性。考虑到对住院费用的日益重视以及骨科损伤门诊管理的进展,这种持续趋势值得关注。