基于微信和纸质版的简要疼痛量表和疼痛察觉问卷用于收集带状疱疹后神经痛患者的数据：对其有效性和可靠性的分析。

Brief pain inventory and pain detection questionnaire based on WeChat and paper versions for collecting data on patients with herpes zoster-induced neuralgia: An analysis for their validity and reliability.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, Hangzhou Third People's Hospital, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.

出版信息

Medicine (Baltimore). 2023 Aug 11;102(32):e34542. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000034542.

DOI:10.1097/MD.0000000000034542

PMID:37565884

原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10419667/

Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study explored the validity and reliability of brief pain inventory (BPI) and pain detection questionnaire (PD-Q) based on WeChat and paper versions for collecting data on patients with herpes zoster-induced neuralgia.

METHODS

The study participants were 160 patients with herpes zoster-induced neuralgia admitted in our hospital from December 2017 to June 2020. Initially, the participants were randomly divided into group A (n = 80) and group B (n = 80). Then, they were required to complete the Chinese versions of the BPI and PD-Q. In group A, the WeChat version was finished first, followed by the paper version. In group B, the paper version was completed first, followed by the WeChat version. Then, the test-retest reliability was analyzed by comparing the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) between the 2 groups. Bland-Altman plots and Pearson correlation coefficient were used to analyze the concordance between the paper and WeChat versions.

RESULTS

Patients generally preferred the WeChat version of the BPI and PD-Q, particularly men and patients with pain duration ≥ 30 minutes. Specifically, no significant differences in the completion time of the BPI and PD-Q was found between the 2 groups. All patients had high test-retest reliability and internal consistency for both WeChat and paper versions (BPI: ICC, 0.913; Cronbach alpha coefficient, 0.959; PD-Q: ICC, 0.825; Cronbach alpha coefficient, 0.894). Bland-Altman plots indicated no significant systematic deviations between the WeChat and paper versions. Pearson correlation coefficient revealed a strong correlation between BPI (Spearman, 0.928) and PD-Q (Spearman, 0.830) questionnaires.

CONCLUSION

The WeChat and paper versions of the BPI and PD-Q have good repeatability, reliability, and consistency for collecting data on patients with herpes zoster-induced neuralgia.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在探讨基于微信和纸质版的简短疼痛量表（BPI）和疼痛察觉问卷（PD-Q）用于采集带状疱疹后神经痛患者数据的有效性和可靠性。

方法

本研究纳入了 2017 年 12 月至 2020 年 6 月期间我院收治的 160 例带状疱疹后神经痛患者。患者最初被随机分为 A 组（n=80）和 B 组（n=80）。然后，他们需要完成 BPI 和 PD-Q 的中文版。在 A 组中，患者首先完成微信版，然后是纸质版；在 B 组中，患者首先完成纸质版，然后是微信版。然后，通过比较两组间的组内相关系数（ICC）来分析测试-重测信度。采用 Bland-Altman 图和 Pearson 相关系数来分析纸质版和微信版之间的一致性。

结果

患者普遍更喜欢 BPI 和 PD-Q 的微信版，尤其是男性和疼痛持续时间≥30 分钟的患者。具体来说，两组 BPI 和 PD-Q 的完成时间没有显著差异。所有患者对微信和纸质版的 BPI 和 PD-Q 均具有较高的测试-重测信度和内部一致性（BPI：ICC 为 0.913，Cronbach α 系数为 0.959；PD-Q：ICC 为 0.825，Cronbach α 系数为 0.894）。Bland-Altman 图表明微信和纸质版之间没有显著的系统偏差。Pearson 相关系数显示 BPI（Spearman，0.928）和 PD-Q（Spearman，0.830）问卷之间具有很强的相关性。