• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

妊娠期和足月单胎妊娠出生结局与不孕治疗的关系。

Gestational Age and Birth Outcomes in Term Singleton Pregnancies Conceived With Infertility Treatment.

机构信息

Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio.

出版信息

JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Aug 1;6(8):e2328335. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.28335.

DOI:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.28335
PMID:37566418
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10422180/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Despite the increased perinatal risks associated with pregnancies conceived with infertility treatment, there are no recommendations for timing of delivery among this at-risk population.

OBJECTIVE

To identify the gestational age at which the ongoing risks of stillbirth are optimally balanced with the risks of neonatal comorbidities and infant deaths in term singleton pregnancies conceived with infertility treatment.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This cohort study used birth and death data from January 1, 2014, to December 31, 2018, in the US obtained from the National Center for Health Statistics. Singleton pregnancies conceived with infertility treatment delivered at term (37-42 weeks' gestation) were eligible for inclusion. The exclusion criteria were deliveries at less than 37 weeks' or at least 43 weeks' gestation and pregnancies with unknown history of infertility treatment, congenital anomalies, pregestational diabetes, pregestational hypertension, gestational hypertension, and preeclampsia. Data were analyzed from July 22, 2022, to June 24, 2023.

EXPOSURE

Gestational age at delivery between 37 and 42 weeks.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary outcome was optimal timing of delivery. To ascertain this timing, the risk of delivery (rate of neonatal morbidity and infant death) at a given gestational week was compared with the risk of delivery in the subsequent week of gestation for an additional week (rate of stillbirth during the given week per 10 000 ongoing pregnancies plus rate of neonatal morbidity and infant death in the subsequent week of gestation per 10 000 deliveries). The rates of stillbirth, neonatal morbidity, and infant death (within 1 year of life) were compared at each week. Neonatal morbidity included an Apgar score of 3 or lower at 5 minutes, requirement of ventilation for 6 hours or more, neonatal intensive care unit admission, and seizures.

RESULTS

Of the 178 448 singleton term pregnancies conceived with infertility treatment (maternal mean [SD] age, 34.2 [5.2] years; mean [SD] gestational age, 39.2 [1.2] weeks; 130 786 [73.5%] were non-Hispanic White patients). The risk of delivery in the subsequent week of gestation was lower than the risk of delivery at both 37 weeks (628 [95% CI, 601-656] vs 1005 [95% CI, 961-1050] per 10 000 live births) and 38 weeks (483 [95% CI, 467-500 vs 625 [95% CI, 598-652] per 10 000 live births). The risks of delivery in subsequent week of gestation significantly exceeded the risk of delivery at 39 weeks (599 [95% CI, 576-622] vs 479 [95% CI, 463-495] per 10 000 live births) and were not significant at 40 weeks (639 [95% CI, 605-675] vs 594 [95% CI, 572-617] per 10 000 live births) and 41 weeks (701 [95% CI, 628-781] vs 633 [95% CI, 599-669] per 10 000 live births).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Results of this study suggest that, in pregnancies conceived with infertility treatment, delivery at 39 weeks provided the lowest perinatal risk when comparing risk of delivery at this week of gestation vs the subsequent week of gestation.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b41a/10422180/f5a6fe692404/jamanetwopen-e2328335-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b41a/10422180/f1d0467fbc9d/jamanetwopen-e2328335-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b41a/10422180/f5a6fe692404/jamanetwopen-e2328335-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b41a/10422180/f1d0467fbc9d/jamanetwopen-e2328335-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b41a/10422180/f5a6fe692404/jamanetwopen-e2328335-g002.jpg
摘要

重要性

尽管与不孕治疗相关的围产期风险增加,但对于高危人群,目前没有关于分娩时机的建议。

目的

确定在患有不孕治疗的足月单胎妊娠中,何时出生可以使死产的持续风险与新生儿合并症和婴儿死亡的风险达到最佳平衡。

设计、地点和参与者:本队列研究使用了美国国家卫生统计中心 2014 年 1 月 1 日至 2018 年 12 月 31 日的出生和死亡数据。本研究纳入了足月(37-42 周)且患有不孕治疗的单胎妊娠。排除标准为孕 37 周前或至少 43 周分娩以及未知不孕治疗史、先天性异常、孕前糖尿病、孕前高血压、妊娠期高血压和子痫前期的妊娠。数据分析时间为 2022 年 7 月 22 日至 2023 年 6 月 24 日。

暴露

分娩时的胎龄在 37 至 42 周之间。

主要结局和测量

主要结局是最佳分娩时机。为了确定这一时机,在特定妊娠周,分娩的风险(新生儿发病率和婴儿死亡的发生率)与随后一周的分娩风险进行了比较,即该周的死产风险(每 10000 例持续妊娠的死产率)与随后一周的分娩风险(每 10000 例分娩的新生儿发病率和婴儿死亡率)。每周比较死产、新生儿发病率和婴儿死亡(出生后 1 年内)的发生率。新生儿发病率包括 5 分钟时 Apgar 评分为 3 或更低、需要通气 6 小时或更长时间、新生儿重症监护病房入院和癫痫发作。

结果

在 178448 例患有不孕治疗的足月单胎妊娠中(产妇平均[标准差]年龄为 34.2[5.2]岁;平均[标准差]胎龄为 39.2[1.2]周;130786[73.5%]为非西班牙裔白人患者)。与孕 37 周(628[95%可信区间,601-656]比 1005[95%可信区间,961-1050]每 10000 例活产)和孕 38 周(483[95%可信区间,467-500]比 625[95%可信区间,598-652]每 10000 例活产)相比,下一孕周分娩的风险较低。下一孕周分娩的风险显著高于孕 39 周(599[95%可信区间,576-622]比 479[95%可信区间,463-495]每 10000 例活产),而与孕 40 周(639[95%可信区间,605-675]比 594[95%可信区间,572-617]每 10000 例活产)和孕 41 周(701[95%可信区间,628-781]比 633[95%可信区间,599-669]每 10000 例活产)无显著差异。

结论和相关性

本研究结果表明,在患有不孕治疗的妊娠中,与下一孕周相比,39 周分娩的围产期风险最低。

相似文献

1
Gestational Age and Birth Outcomes in Term Singleton Pregnancies Conceived With Infertility Treatment.妊娠期和足月单胎妊娠出生结局与不孕治疗的关系。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Aug 1;6(8):e2328335. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.28335.
2
Neonatal outcomes and rationale for timing of birth in perinatal diabetes: a retrospective cohort study.围产期糖尿病新生儿结局及分娩时机的理由:一项回顾性队列研究。
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2023 Oct;5(10):101129. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2023.101129. Epub 2023 Aug 9.
3
Risks of stillbirth, neonatal mortality, and severe neonatal morbidity by birthweight centiles associated with expectant management at term.与期待治疗足月相关的出生体重百分位数与死产、新生儿死亡和严重新生儿发病率的风险。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2023 Oct;229(4):451.e1-451.e15. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2023.04.044. Epub 2023 May 5.
4
Maternal and perinatal outcomes in primiparous singleton pregnancies conceived with assisted reproductive technology in British Columbia.不列颠哥伦比亚省采用辅助生殖技术的初产妇单胎妊娠的母婴围生期结局。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2023 Dec;291:106-111. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2023.10.010. Epub 2023 Oct 18.
5
Perinatal mortality and neonatal and maternal outcome per gestational week in term pregnancies: A registry-based study.足月妊娠的围产儿死亡率及新生儿和产妇结局与孕周的关系:一项基于注册的研究。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2023 Jan;102(1):82-91. doi: 10.1111/aogs.14467. Epub 2022 Oct 20.
6
Impact of labor induction at 39 weeks gestation compared with expectant management on maternal and perinatal morbidity among a cohort of low-risk women.39 孕周引产与期待治疗对低危孕妇母婴围生期发病率的影响。
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2022 Dec;35(25):9208-9214. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2021.2021396. Epub 2021 Dec 29.
7
The risk of perinatal mortality with each week of expectant management in obese pregnancies.肥胖孕妇期待管理每增加一周的围产期死亡风险。
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2019 Feb;32(3):434-441. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2017.1381903. Epub 2017 Sep 27.
8
Cesarean section on request at 39 weeks: impact on shoulder dystocia, fetal trauma, neonatal encephalopathy, and intrauterine fetal demise.39周选择性剖宫产:对肩难产、胎儿创伤、新生儿脑病及胎儿宫内死亡的影响
Semin Perinatol. 2006 Oct;30(5):276-87. doi: 10.1053/j.semperi.2006.07.009.
9
Prospective risk of stillbirth and neonatal complications in twin pregnancies: systematic review and meta-analysis.双胎妊娠中死产和新生儿并发症的前瞻性风险:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMJ. 2016 Sep 6;354:i4353. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i4353.
10
The risk of stillbirth and infant death by each additional week of expectant management in twin pregnancies.双胎妊娠期待管理每增加一周的死产和婴儿死亡风险。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 May;212(5):630.e1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.03.033. Epub 2015 Mar 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Perinatal complications and neonatal outcomes in fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a propensity score matching cohort study.受精/卵胞浆内单精子注射的围产期并发症和新生儿结局:倾向评分匹配队列研究。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2024 Jul 18;15:1405550. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2024.1405550. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
Fertility of Men and Women Aged 15-49 in the United States: National Survey of Family Growth,2015-2019.美国 15-49 岁男性和女性的生育能力:2015-2019 年全国家庭增长调查。
Natl Health Stat Report. 2023 Jan(179):1-22.
2
Assisted Reproductive Technology Surveillance - United States, 2018.辅助生殖技术监测报告——美国,2018 年。
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2022 Feb 18;71(4):1-19. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.ss7104a1.
3
Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine Consult Series #60: Management of pregnancies resulting from in vitro fertilization.母胎医学协会咨询系列第60期:体外受精妊娠的管理
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Mar;226(3):B2-B12. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.11.001. Epub 2021 Nov 2.
4
Medically Indicated Late-Preterm and Early-Term Deliveries: ACOG Committee Opinion Summary,Number 831.医学指征性晚期早产和早期足月分娩:美国妇产科医师学会委员会意见摘要,第831号
Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Jul 1;138(1):166-169. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004448.
5
Assisted reproductive technologies and the risk of stillbirth in singleton pregnancies: a systematic review and meta-analysis.辅助生殖技术与单胎妊娠中死胎风险:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Fertil Steril. 2021 Sep;116(3):784-792. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2021.04.007. Epub 2021 May 20.
6
Minimum standards for practices offering assisted reproductive technologies: a committee opinion.提供辅助生殖技术的实践的最低标准:委员会意见。
Fertil Steril. 2021 Mar;115(3):578-582. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2020.12.036. Epub 2021 Feb 7.
7
Fetal Growth Restriction: ACOG Practice Bulletin, Number 227.胎儿生长受限:ACOG 实践通报,第 227 号。
Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Feb 1;137(2):e16-e28. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004251.
8
Cost of Elective Labor Induction Compared With Expectant Management in Nulliparous Women.选择性引产与初产妇期待管理的成本比较。
Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Jul;136(1):19-25. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003930.
9
Risk of Stillbirth after Infertility Treatment in the United States: 2014-2017.美国2014 - 2017年不孕治疗后的死产风险
Int J MCH AIDS. 2020;9(1):149-152. doi: 10.21106/ijma.345. Epub 2020 Feb 10.
10
Labor Induction versus Expectant Management in Low-Risk Nulliparous Women.低危初产妇引产与期待管理的比较。
N Engl J Med. 2018 Aug 9;379(6):513-523. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1800566.