Suppr超能文献

圈套自膨胀装置以促进复杂主动脉解剖结构患者的经导管主动脉瓣置换术

Snaring Self-Expanding Devices to Facilitate Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients with Complex Aortic Anatomies.

作者信息

Yao Yi-Jun, Zhao Zhen-Gang, Wang Xi, Peng Yong, Wei Jia-Fu, He Sen, Li Yi-Jian, He Jing-Jing, Zhu Zhong-Kai, Feng Yuan, Chen Mao

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2023 Aug 1;12(15):5067. doi: 10.3390/jcm12155067.

Abstract

The snare-assisted technique has been described to facilitate transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) delivery system advancement in complex aortic anatomies. However, the evidence is limited to case reports. To evaluate the safety profile of the snare-facilitated approach and its impact on self-expanding (SE) TAVR outcomes, we collected consecutive patients who underwent transfemoral SE-TAVR for aortic stenosis, using propensity score matching (PSM) separately in tricuspid and type-0 and type-1 bicuspid aortic valve morphology between the snare and non-snare groups. In 766 patients, despite the snare group having significantly larger annulus angulation and maximal ascending aortic diameter, both groups achieved comparable 30-day device success rates, regardless of first-generation or new-generation valve use. After PSM, the snare group had a significantly lower new permanent pacemaker implantation rate among 193 type-0 patients (3.3% vs. 18.3%, = 0.01). The ipsilateral group used new-generation valves less frequently (23.0% vs. 75.4%, < 0.001), but there were no significant inter-group differences in procedure-related events, except for a lower incidence of PVL ≥ mild in the ipsilateral group (14.9% vs. 32.3%, = 0.01). In conclusion, the snare-assisted technique appears useful in SE-TAVR with angulated aortic root anatomy, and the benefits were comparable between ipsilateral and contralateral snare techniques.

摘要

圈套器辅助技术已被描述用于促进经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)输送系统在复杂主动脉解剖结构中的推进。然而,证据仅限于病例报告。为了评估圈套器辅助方法的安全性及其对自膨胀(SE)TAVR结果的影响,我们收集了连续接受经股动脉SE-TAVR治疗主动脉瓣狭窄的患者,并在圈套器组和非圈套器组之间分别对三尖瓣、0型和1型二叶式主动脉瓣形态进行倾向得分匹配(PSM)。在766例患者中,尽管圈套器组的瓣环角度和升主动脉最大直径明显更大,但无论使用第一代还是新一代瓣膜,两组的30天器械成功率相当。PSM后,在193例0型患者中,圈套器组的新永久性起搏器植入率显著较低(3.3%对18.3%,P = 0.01)。同侧组较少使用新一代瓣膜(23.0%对75.4%,P < 0.001),但除同侧组中PVL≥轻度的发生率较低(14.9%对32.3%,P = 0.01)外,两组在手术相关事件方面无显著差异。总之,圈套器辅助技术在主动脉根部解剖结构成角的SE-TAVR中似乎有用,同侧和对侧圈套器技术的益处相当。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0287/10420027/91c8241dba33/jcm-12-05067-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验