• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

葡萄牙药房与初级保健机构在高血压和高脂血症联合管理中的真实世界有效性:一项多中心实用对照试验(USFarmácia)

Real-World Effectiveness in Hypertension and Hyperlipidemia Collaborative Management between Pharmacies and Primary Care in Portugal: A Multicenter Pragmatic Controlled Trial (USFarmácia).

作者信息

Costa Suzete, Biscaia José Luís, Horta Maria Rute, Romano Sónia, Guerreiro José, Heudtlass Peter, Cary Maria, Romão Mariana, Teixeira Rodrigues António, Miranda Ana, Martins Ana Paula, Bento Ana Sofia, Pereira João, Mateus Céu, Helling Dennis K

机构信息

NOVA National School of Public Health (ENSP), Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, 1600-560 Lisboa, Portugal.

Institute for Evidence-Based Health (ISBE), 1649-028 Lisboa, Portugal.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Aug 1;20(15):6496. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20156496.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph20156496
PMID:37569036
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10418740/
Abstract

There is evidence of the efficacy of collaborative health interventions with pharmacies and primary care providers but little of its real-world effectiveness. We aimed to assess the effectiveness and discuss the design and challenges of hypertension and hyperlipidemia management between pharmacies and primary care providers using real-world data exchange between providers and experimental bundled payment. This was a pragmatic, quasi-experimental controlled trial. We collected patient-level data from primary care prescription claims and Electronic Medical Record databases, a pharmacy claims database, and patient telephone surveys at several time points. The primary outcomes were changes in blood pressure and total cholesterol. We used matched controls with difference-in-differences estimators in a Generalized Linear Model (GLM) and controlled interrupted time series (CITS). We collected additional data for economic and qualitative studies. A total of 6 Primary Care Units, 20 pharmacies, and 203 patients entered the study. We were not able to observe significant differences in the effect of intervention vs. control. We experienced challenges that required creative strategies. This real-world trial was not able to show effectiveness, likely due to limitations in the primary care technology which affected the sample size. It offers, however, valuable lessons on methods, strategies, and data sources, paving the way for more real-world effectiveness trials to advance value-based healthcare.

摘要

有证据表明,与药房和初级保健提供者合作开展的健康干预措施具有疗效,但其实践效果的证据却很少。我们旨在利用提供者之间的实际数据交换和实验性捆绑支付,评估药房和初级保健提供者之间高血压和高脂血症管理的效果,并讨论其设计和挑战。这是一项务实的准实验对照试验。我们在几个时间点从初级保健处方索赔和电子病历数据库、药房索赔数据库以及患者电话调查中收集了患者层面的数据。主要结局是血压和总胆固醇的变化。我们在广义线性模型(GLM)和对照中断时间序列(CITS)中使用了带有差异估计量的匹配对照。我们还收集了用于经济和定性研究的额外数据。共有6个初级保健单位、20家药房和203名患者参与了该研究。我们未能观察到干预组与对照组在效果上存在显著差异。我们遇到了一些需要创造性策略的挑战。这项实际试验未能显示出效果,可能是由于初级保健技术的局限性影响了样本量。然而,它在方法、策略和数据来源方面提供了宝贵的经验教训,为更多推进基于价值的医疗保健的实际效果试验铺平了道路。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/18c9/10418740/66e1178c8690/ijerph-20-06496-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/18c9/10418740/75918770e3cc/ijerph-20-06496-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/18c9/10418740/d0a28d11ddcc/ijerph-20-06496-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/18c9/10418740/5c6276000dbb/ijerph-20-06496-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/18c9/10418740/d83bb5dfa4d6/ijerph-20-06496-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/18c9/10418740/66e1178c8690/ijerph-20-06496-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/18c9/10418740/75918770e3cc/ijerph-20-06496-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/18c9/10418740/d0a28d11ddcc/ijerph-20-06496-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/18c9/10418740/5c6276000dbb/ijerph-20-06496-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/18c9/10418740/d83bb5dfa4d6/ijerph-20-06496-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/18c9/10418740/66e1178c8690/ijerph-20-06496-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Real-World Effectiveness in Hypertension and Hyperlipidemia Collaborative Management between Pharmacies and Primary Care in Portugal: A Multicenter Pragmatic Controlled Trial (USFarmácia).葡萄牙药房与初级保健机构在高血压和高脂血症联合管理中的真实世界有效性:一项多中心实用对照试验(USFarmácia)
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Aug 1;20(15):6496. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20156496.
2
Cost-effectiveness and cost-utility of hypertension and hyperlipidemia collaborative management between pharmacies and primary care in portugal alongside a trial compared with usual care (USFarmácia).葡萄牙药房与初级保健机构之间高血压和高脂血症联合管理相对于常规护理(USFarmácia)的成本效益和成本效用,并伴有一项试验。
Front Pharmacol. 2022 Sep 8;13:903270. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.903270. eCollection 2022.
3
Patient preferences and cost-benefit of hypertension and hyperlipidemia collaborative management model between pharmacies and primary care in Portugal: A discrete choice experiment alongside a trial (USFarmácia®).葡萄牙药房与基层医疗合作管理高血压和高血脂模式的患者偏好和成本效益:一项伴随试验的离散选择实验(USFarmácia®)。
PLoS One. 2023 Oct 5;18(10):e0292308. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0292308. eCollection 2023.
4
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
5
Public stewardship of private for-profit healthcare providers in low- and middle-income countries.低收入和中等收入国家对私营营利性医疗服务提供者的公共管理。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Aug 11;2016(8):CD009855. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009855.pub2.
6
Evaluation of the first year of a pilot program in community pharmacy: HIV/AIDS medication therapy management for Medi-Cal beneficiaries.社区药房试点项目第一年评估:为医疗救助计划受益人提供的艾滋病毒/艾滋病药物治疗管理
J Manag Care Pharm. 2009 Jan-Feb;15(1):32-41. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2009.15.1.32.
7
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
8
Evaluation of a Collaborative Protocolized Approach by Community Pharmacists and General Medical Practitioners for an Australian Minor Ailments Scheme: Protocol for a Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial.社区药剂师与普通医生针对澳大利亚小病诊疗计划采用协作式标准化方法的评估:一项整群随机对照试验方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2019 Aug 9;8(8):e13973. doi: 10.2196/13973.
9
10
Systematic review of pragmatic randomised control trials assessing the effectiveness of professional pharmacy services in community pharmacies.评估社区药房专业药学服务有效性的实用随机对照试验的系统评价
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Feb 17;21(1):156. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06150-8.

引用本文的文献

1
2024 consensus document of the Italian Society of Arterial Hypertension (SIIA) and the Italian Society of Cardiovascular Prevention (SIPREC): update on LDL cholesterol lowering in patients with arterial hypertension.意大利动脉高血压学会(SIIA)和意大利心血管预防学会(SIPREC)2024年共识文件:动脉高血压患者降低低密度脂蛋白胆固醇的最新进展
High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev. 2025 Mar;32(2):151-163. doi: 10.1007/s40292-024-00700-x. Epub 2025 Feb 25.
2
Adherence to pharmacological therapy for hypertension in Portugal: a health professionals focus groups study.葡萄牙高血压药物治疗的依从性:一项卫生专业人员焦点小组研究。
BMC Prim Care. 2025 Feb 18;26(1):44. doi: 10.1186/s12875-025-02705-4.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Cost-effectiveness and cost-utility of hypertension and hyperlipidemia collaborative management between pharmacies and primary care in portugal alongside a trial compared with usual care (USFarmácia).葡萄牙药房与初级保健机构之间高血压和高脂血症联合管理相对于常规护理(USFarmácia)的成本效益和成本效用,并伴有一项试验。
Front Pharmacol. 2022 Sep 8;13:903270. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.903270. eCollection 2022.
2
Defining ambulatory care sensitive conditions for adults in Portugal.定义葡萄牙成人的门诊医疗敏感条件。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Aug 15;20(1):754. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05620-9.
3
An overview of systematic reviews of economic evaluations of pharmacy-based public health interventions: addressing methodological challenges.
Patient preferences and cost-benefit of hypertension and hyperlipidemia collaborative management model between pharmacies and primary care in Portugal: A discrete choice experiment alongside a trial (USFarmácia®).
葡萄牙药房与基层医疗合作管理高血压和高血脂模式的患者偏好和成本效益:一项伴随试验的离散选择实验(USFarmácia®)。
PLoS One. 2023 Oct 5;18(10):e0292308. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0292308. eCollection 2023.
系统评价药学公共卫生干预措施的经济评价:解决方法学挑战概述。
Syst Rev. 2019 Nov 11;8(1):272. doi: 10.1186/s13643-019-1177-3.
4
Prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors and other comorbidities in patients with hypertension in Portuguese primary health care populations: The PRECISE study.葡萄牙初级卫生保健人群中高血压患者心血管危险因素及其他合并症的患病率:PRECISE研究
Rev Port Cardiol (Engl Ed). 2019 Jun;38(6):427-437. doi: 10.1016/j.repc.2018.09.011. Epub 2019 Jul 12.
5
The use of controls in interrupted time series studies of public health interventions.公共卫生干预措施的中断时间序列研究中对照的使用。
Int J Epidemiol. 2018 Dec 1;47(6):2082-2093. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyy135.
6
The validity of the Rx-Risk Comorbidity Index using medicines mapped to the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) Classification System.使用映射到解剖学治疗学化学(ATC)分类系统的药物的Rx风险合并症指数的有效性。
BMJ Open. 2018 Apr 13;8(4):e021122. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-021122.
7
Synthetic control methodology as a tool for evaluating population-level health interventions.合成控制法作为一种评估人群健康干预措施的工具。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2018 Aug;72(8):673-678. doi: 10.1136/jech-2017-210106. Epub 2018 Apr 13.
8
Systolic Blood Pressure Reduction and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease and Mortality: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.收缩压降低与心血管疾病和死亡风险:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
JAMA Cardiol. 2017 Jul 1;2(7):775-781. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2017.1421.
9
Series: Pragmatic trials and real world evidence: Paper 1. Introduction.系列:实用试验与真实世界证据:论文1. 引言。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2017 Aug;88:7-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.12.023. Epub 2017 May 24.
10
Interrupted time series regression for the evaluation of public health interventions: a tutorial.中断时间序列回归在公共卫生干预措施评价中的应用:教程。
Int J Epidemiol. 2017 Feb 1;46(1):348-355. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyw098.