• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不同亚型抗表皮生长因子受体单克隆抗体在小鼠体内的抗肿瘤活性机制

Mechanism of antitumor activity in mice for anti-epidermal growth factor receptor monoclonal antibodies with different isotypes.

作者信息

Masui H, Moroyama T, Mendelsohn J

出版信息

Cancer Res. 1986 Nov;46(11):5592-8.

PMID:3756906
Abstract

In previous studies of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) against the receptor for epidermal growth factor (EGF) both 528 IgG2a and 225 IgG1 were shown to inhibit growth of A431 cell xenografts in athymic mice. The antitumor activities of the two mAbs were similar and, although they differ in their isotypes, they share many properties. The two mAbs bind to EGF receptors with identical affinities, compete with EGF for binding to EGF receptors, down regulate the receptors identically, block EGF-induced activation of tyrosine protein kinase activity to a comparable degree, and block EGF-induced changes in the proliferation of cultured cells. These similarities in physiological effects permit a direct comparison of the mechanisms of action mAbs of the IgG1 and IgG2a isotypes. We examined in vitro cytotoxicity against A431 cells, using 528 IgG2a and 225 IgG1 mAbs. 528 IgG2a, but not 225 IgG1, demonstrated partial complement-mediated cytotoxicity by the 51Cr release assay and by growth inhibition of cultured A431 cells. 528 IgG2a, but not 225 IgG1, was cytotoxic to A431 cells in the presence of activated peritoneal macrophages, as demonstrated by release of incorporated [3H]thymidine. Neither mAb showed any significant cytotoxicity to A431 cells in the presence of nonadherent spleen cells which contain K-cells. The results of in vitro cytotoxicity experiments suggested that the antitumor activity of 528 IgG2a, but not 225 IgG1, could be mediated by macrophages. This was verified by in vivo experiments in which s.c. tumor cell inocula containing activated macrophages showed enhancement of antitumor effects in animals treated i.p. twice weekly for 3 weeks with suboptimal doses of 528 IgG2a. This enhancement was not observed when 225 IgG1 was used with the same procedure. The results of these experiments suggest that immune mechanisms involving activated macrophages or complement could contribute to the antitumor activity of anti-EGF receptor mAb with the IgG2a isotype, but not with the IgG1 isotype. This observation confirms the findings of others who examined the antitumor activity of IgG2a mAbs in other model systems. IgG1 mAb 225, and possibly IgG2a mAb 528, may prevent growth of human tumor xenografts by altering the physiological functions of the EGF receptor rather than by immune mechanisms.

摘要

在先前针对表皮生长因子(EGF)受体的单克隆抗体(mAb)研究中,已证明528 IgG2a和225 IgG1均能抑制无胸腺小鼠体内A431细胞异种移植瘤的生长。这两种单克隆抗体的抗肿瘤活性相似,尽管它们的亚型不同,但具有许多共同特性。这两种单克隆抗体以相同的亲和力与EGF受体结合,与EGF竞争结合EGF受体,同样地下调受体,在相当程度上阻断EGF诱导的酪氨酸蛋白激酶活性激活,并阻断EGF诱导的培养细胞增殖变化。这些生理效应的相似性使得可以直接比较IgG1和IgG2a亚型单克隆抗体的作用机制。我们使用528 IgG2a和225 IgG1单克隆抗体检测了对A431细胞的体外细胞毒性。通过51Cr释放试验和培养的A431细胞生长抑制试验表明,528 IgG2a而非225 IgG1表现出部分补体介导的细胞毒性。如通过掺入的[3H]胸腺嘧啶核苷释放所证明的,在存在活化的腹腔巨噬细胞的情况下,528 IgG2a而非225 IgG1对A431细胞具有细胞毒性。在存在含有K细胞的非贴壁脾细胞的情况下,两种单克隆抗体对A431细胞均未显示出任何显著的细胞毒性。体外细胞毒性实验结果表明,528 IgG2a而非225 IgG1的抗肿瘤活性可能由巨噬细胞介导。这在体内实验中得到了验证,在体内实验中,含有活化巨噬细胞的皮下肿瘤细胞接种物在每周两次腹腔注射亚最佳剂量的528 IgG2a共3周的动物中显示出抗肿瘤作用增强。当以相同程序使用225 IgG1时未观察到这种增强。这些实验结果表明,涉及活化巨噬细胞或补体的免疫机制可能有助于IgG2a亚型抗EGF受体单克隆抗体的抗肿瘤活性,但对IgG1亚型则不然。这一观察结果证实了其他人在其他模型系统中检测IgG2a单克隆抗体抗肿瘤活性的发现。IgG1单克隆抗体225以及可能的IgG2a单克隆抗体528可能通过改变EGF受体的生理功能而非免疫机制来阻止人肿瘤异种移植瘤的生长。

相似文献

1
Mechanism of antitumor activity in mice for anti-epidermal growth factor receptor monoclonal antibodies with different isotypes.不同亚型抗表皮生长因子受体单克隆抗体在小鼠体内的抗肿瘤活性机制
Cancer Res. 1986 Nov;46(11):5592-8.
2
Cytotoxicity against human tumor cells mediated by the conjugate of anti-epidermal growth factor receptor monoclonal antibody to recombinant ricin A chain.抗表皮生长因子受体单克隆抗体与重组蓖麻毒素A链偶联物介导的对人肿瘤细胞的细胞毒性
Cancer Res. 1989 Jul 1;49(13):3482-8.
3
Blockade of epidermal growth factor receptor function by bivalent and monovalent fragments of 225 anti-epidermal growth factor receptor monoclonal antibodies.225种抗表皮生长因子受体单克隆抗体的二价和单价片段对表皮生长因子受体功能的阻断作用
Cancer Res. 1993 Sep 15;53(18):4322-8.
4
Impact of human IgA antibodies on complement-dependent cytotoxicity mediated by combinations of EGF-R-directed antibodies.人 IgA 抗体对表皮生长因子受体导向抗体组合介导的补体依赖性细胞毒性的影响。
Arch Immunol Ther Exp (Warsz). 2010 Aug;58(4):303-12. doi: 10.1007/s00005-010-0081-2. Epub 2010 May 28.
5
Monoclonal antibodies specific for the neu oncogene product directly mediate anti-tumor effects in vivo.针对neu癌基因产物的单克隆抗体在体内直接介导抗肿瘤作用。
Oncogene. 1988 Apr;2(4):387-94.
6
Two distinct mechanisms of antitumor activity mediated by the combination of interleukin 2 and monoclonal antibodies.白细胞介素2与单克隆抗体联合介导的两种不同抗肿瘤活性机制。
Cancer Res. 1990 Sep 15;50(18):5767-72.
7
Enhanced antitumor effects of CD20 over CD19 monoclonal antibodies in a nude mouse xenograft model.在裸鼠异种移植模型中,CD20单克隆抗体比CD19单克隆抗体具有更强的抗肿瘤作用。
Cancer Res. 1995 Feb 15;55(4):840-6.
8
Growth inhibition of human tumor cells in athymic mice by anti-epidermal growth factor receptor monoclonal antibodies.抗表皮生长因子受体单克隆抗体对无胸腺小鼠体内人肿瘤细胞生长的抑制作用
Cancer Res. 1984 Mar;44(3):1002-7.
9
Antitumor effect of anti-epidermal growth factor receptor monoclonal antibodies plus cis-diamminedichloroplatinum on well established A431 cell xenografts.抗表皮生长因子受体单克隆抗体联合顺二氯二氨铂对已形成的A431细胞异种移植瘤的抗肿瘤作用。
Cancer Res. 1993 Oct 1;53(19):4637-42.
10
Combined therapy of mice bearing a lymphokine-activated killer-resistant tumor with recombinant interleukin 2 and an antitumor monoclonal antibody capable of inducing antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity.用重组白细胞介素2和一种能够诱导抗体依赖性细胞毒性的抗肿瘤单克隆抗体对携带抗淋巴因子激活的杀伤细胞肿瘤的小鼠进行联合治疗。
Cancer Res. 1988 Mar 1;48(5):1173-9.

引用本文的文献

1
EGFR and MUC1 as dual-TAA drug targets for lung cancer and colorectal cancer.表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)和粘蛋白1(MUC1)作为肺癌和结直肠癌的双肿瘤相关抗原(TAA)药物靶点。
Front Oncol. 2024 Nov 27;14:1433033. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1433033. eCollection 2024.
2
Personalizing colon cancer therapeutics: targeting old and new mechanisms of action.个体化结肠癌治疗:靶向新旧作用机制。
Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2013 Aug 21;6(8):988-1038. doi: 10.3390/ph6080988.
3
IgE-based immunotherapy of cancer: challenges and chances.基于 IgE 的癌症免疫疗法:挑战与机遇。
Allergy. 2014 Feb;69(2):137-49. doi: 10.1111/all.12276. Epub 2013 Oct 14.
4
Inhibition of TGF-β enhances the in vivo antitumor efficacy of EGF receptor-targeted therapy.抑制 TGF-β 增强了表皮生长因子受体靶向治疗的体内抗肿瘤疗效。
Mol Cancer Ther. 2012 Nov;11(11):2429-39. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-12-0101-T. Epub 2012 Aug 27.
5
EGFR targeted therapy in non-small cell lung cancer: potential role of cetuximab.表皮生长因子受体靶向治疗在非小细胞肺癌中的应用:西妥昔单抗的潜在作用
Biologics. 2009;3:215-24. Epub 2009 Jul 13.
6
Monoclonal antibody mechanisms of action in cancer.癌症中单克隆抗体的作用机制。
Immunol Res. 2007;39(1-3):271-8. doi: 10.1007/s12026-007-0073-4.
7
A highly effective and stable bispecific diabody for cancer immunotherapy: cure of xenografted tumors by bispecific diabody and T-LAK cells.一种用于癌症免疫治疗的高效稳定双特异性双抗体:双特异性双抗体与T-LAK细胞治愈异种移植肿瘤
Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2004 Jun;53(6):497-509. doi: 10.1007/s00262-003-0465-9. Epub 2003 Nov 25.
8
Inhibitory effects of EGFR antisense oligodeox ynucleotide in human colorectal cancer cell line.表皮生长因子受体反义寡脱氧核苷酸对人结肠癌细胞系的抑制作用
World J Gastroenterol. 2000 Oct;6(5):747-749. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v6.i5.747.
9
Anti-PSCA mAbs inhibit tumor growth and metastasis formation and prolong the survival of mice bearing human prostate cancer xenografts.抗前列腺干细胞抗原单克隆抗体可抑制肿瘤生长和转移形成,并延长荷人前列腺癌异种移植瘤小鼠的生存期。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 Feb 27;98(5):2658-63. doi: 10.1073/pnas.051624698. Epub 2001 Feb 13.
10
Monoclonal antibodies to growth factors and growth factor receptors: their diagnostic and therapeutic potential in brain tumors.针对生长因子和生长因子受体的单克隆抗体:它们在脑肿瘤中的诊断和治疗潜力。
J Neurooncol. 1997 Dec;35(3):259-73. doi: 10.1023/a:1005812417638.