Kudo Shintarou, Aoyagi Tsutomu, Kobayashi Takumi, Koshino Yuta, Edama Mutsuaki
Department of Physical Therapy, Morinomiya University of Medical Sciences, Osaka 559-8611, Japan.
Department of the Rehabilitation, Oyamadai Orthopedics Clinic Tokyo Arthroscopy Center, Tokyo 158-0082, Japan.
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Aug 7;11(15):2227. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11152227.
The purpose of this study was to develop the assessment of subtalar joint instability with chronic ankle instability (CAI) using ultrasonography. Forty-six patients with anterior talofibular ligament (ATFL) abnormalities and a history of ankle sprain were divided into CAI (21.2 ± 5.9 y/o, 7 males and 17 females) and asymptomatic groups (21.0 ± 7.4 y/o, 9 males and 12 females) on the basis of subjective ankle instability assessed using the CAIT and the Ankle Instability Instrument Tool (AIIT). Twenty-six age-matched feet participated in a control group (18.9 ± 7.0 y/o, 9 males and 17 females). Ultrasound measurements of the width of the posterior subtalar joint facet were obtained at rest and maximum ankle inversion (subtalar joint excursion; STJE). The differences in STJE among the three groups were assessed by one-way ANOVA. The relationship between STJE and subjective ankle instability was assessed using Spearman's correlation tests. The STJE value was significantly greater in the CAI group (2.3 ± 0.8 mm) than in the asymptomatic (1.0 ±0.4 mm) and control groups (0.8 ±0.2 mm) ( < 0.001, effect size: 0.64). STJE had significant negative correlations with CAIT (r = -0.71, < 0.01), and significant positive correlations with AIIT (r = 0.74, < 0.01). The cut-off value to distinguish between the CAI and asymptomatic groups was 1.7 mm using the ROC curve.
本研究的目的是利用超声技术对慢性踝关节不稳(CAI)患者的距下关节不稳进行评估。46例存在距腓前韧带(ATFL)异常且有踝关节扭伤史的患者,根据使用CAIT和踝关节不稳器械工具(AIIT)评估的主观踝关节不稳情况,分为CAI组(21.2±5.9岁,男7例,女17例)和无症状组(21.0±7.4岁,男9例,女12例)。26例年龄匹配的足部纳入对照组(18.9±7.0岁,男9例,女17例)。在静息状态和踝关节最大内翻时(距下关节活动度;STJE)获取距下关节后关节面宽度的超声测量值。通过单因素方差分析评估三组之间STJE的差异。使用Spearman相关检验评估STJE与主观踝关节不稳之间的关系。CAI组的STJE值(2.3±0.8mm)显著高于无症状组(1.0±0.4mm)和对照组(0.8±0.2mm)(<0.001,效应量:0.64)。STJE与CAIT呈显著负相关(r=-0.71,<0.01),与AIIT呈显著正相关(r=0.74,<0.01)。使用ROC曲线,区分CAI组和无症状组的截断值为1.7mm。