Clinical Cardiovascular Research Center, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, USA.
Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 2023 Sep;28(5):e13080. doi: 10.1111/anec.13080. Epub 2023 Aug 11.
Congenital Long QT Syndrome (LQTS) is a hereditary arrhythmic disorder. We aimed to assess the performance of current genetic variant annotation scores among LQTS patients and their predictive impact.
We evaluated 2025 patients with unique mutations for LQT1-LQT3. A patient-specific score was calculated for each of four established genetic variant annotation algorithms: CADD, SIFT, REVEL, and PolyPhen-2. The scores were tested for the identification of LQTS and their predictive performance for cardiac events (CE) and life-threatening events (LTE) and then compared with the predictive performance of LQTS categorization based on mutation location/function. Score performance was tested using Harrell's C-index.
A total of 917 subjects were classified as LQT1, 838 as LQT2, and 270 as LQT3. The identification of a pathogenic variant occurred in 99% with CADD, 92% with SIFT, 100% with REVEL, and 86% with PolyPhen-2. However, none of the genetic scores correlated with the risk of CE (Harrell's C-index: CADD = 0.50, SIFT = 0.51, REVEL = 0.50, and PolyPhen-2 = 0.52) or LTE (Harrell's C-index: CADD = 0.50, SIFT = 0.53, REVEL = 0.54, and PolyPhen-2 = 0.52). In contrast, high-risk mutation categorization based on location/function was a powerful independent predictor of CE (HR = 1.88; p < .001) and LTE (HR = 1.89, p < .001).
In congenital LQTS patients, well-established algorithms (CADD, SIFT, REVEL, and PolyPhen-2) were able to identify the majority of the causal variants as pathogenic. However, the scores did not predict clinical outcomes. These results indicate that mutation location/functional assays are essential for accurate interpretation of the risk associated with LQTS mutations.
先天性长 QT 综合征(LQTS)是一种遗传性心律失常疾病。我们旨在评估当前基因变异注释评分在 LQTS 患者中的表现及其预测影响。
我们评估了 2025 名具有独特 LQT1-LQT3 突变的患者。为四个已建立的遗传变异注释算法(CADD、SIFT、REVEL 和 PolyPhen-2)中的每一个计算了患者特异性评分。测试了这些评分用于识别 LQTS 及其对心脏事件(CE)和危及生命事件(LTE)的预测性能,然后将其与基于突变位置/功能的 LQTS 分类的预测性能进行比较。使用 Harrell 的 C 指数测试评分性能。
共有 917 名受试者被归类为 LQT1,838 名被归类为 LQT2,270 名被归类为 LQT3。CADD 可识别 99%的致病性变异,SIFT 可识别 92%的致病性变异,REVEL 可识别 100%的致病性变异,PolyPhen-2 可识别 86%的致病性变异。然而,没有一种遗传评分与 CE(Harrell 的 C 指数:CADD = 0.50,SIFT = 0.51,REVEL = 0.50,和 PolyPhen-2 = 0.52)或 LTE(Harrell 的 C 指数:CADD = 0.50,SIFT = 0.53,REVEL = 0.54,和 PolyPhen-2 = 0.52)的风险相关。相比之下,基于位置/功能的高危突变分类是 CE(HR = 1.88;p <.001)和 LTE(HR = 1.89,p <.001)的强大独立预测因子。
在先天性 LQTS 患者中,成熟的算法(CADD、SIFT、REVEL 和 PolyPhen-2)能够识别大多数作为致病性的因果变异。然而,这些评分并不能预测临床结局。这些结果表明,突变位置/功能测定对于准确解释与 LQTS 突变相关的风险至关重要。