Suppr超能文献

衡量道德:对道德基础问卷因素结构的考察

Measuring Morality: An Examination of the Moral Foundation Questionnaire's Factor Structure.

作者信息

Wormley Alexandra S, Scott Matthew, Grimm Kevin J, Cohen Adam B

机构信息

Arizona State University, Tempe, USA.

出版信息

Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2025 Feb;51(2):314-328. doi: 10.1177/01461672231191362. Epub 2023 Aug 11.

Abstract

Moral foundations theory proposes five domains of morality-harm, fairness, loyalty, purity, and authority. Endorsement of these moral domains is assessed by the Moral Foundations Questionnaire (MFQ), a 30-item scale that has undergone intense measurement scrutiny. Across five samples ( = 464,229), we show greatly improved model fit using a Bifactor model that accounts for two kinds of items in the MFQ: judgment and relevance. We add to this space by demonstrating how using this improved measurement structure changes the strength of correlations of the moral foundations with numerous attitudes, cognitive styles, and moral decision-making. Future research should continue to identify what, if anything, the relevance and judgment factors might substantively capture over and above the substantive domains of moral foundations. In the meantime, we recommend that researchers use the Bifactor model for its improved model structure, rather than dropping the relevant items as some have proposed.

摘要

道德基础理论提出了道德的五个领域——伤害、公平、忠诚、纯洁和权威。这些道德领域的认可度通过道德基础问卷(MFQ)来评估,这是一个包含30个条目的量表,该量表已经经过了严格的测量审查。在五个样本(N = 464,229)中,我们展示了使用双因素模型极大地改善了模型拟合,该双因素模型考虑了MFQ中的两种项目:判断和相关性。我们通过证明使用这种改进的测量结构如何改变道德基础与众多态度、认知风格和道德决策之间的相关强度,进一步拓展了这一领域。未来的研究应该继续确定,相关性和判断因素除了道德基础的实质领域之外,还可能实质性地捕捉到什么(如果有的话)。与此同时,我们建议研究人员使用双因素模型,因为其模型结构得到了改进,而不是像一些人所建议的那样舍弃相关项目。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验