• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估儿童家庭安全培训对三个家庭支持从业者群体的效果:一项混合方法研究。

Evaluating the effect of child home safety training upon three family support practitioner groups: a mixed-methods study.

作者信息

Taylor M J, Patel T, Orton E, Watson M C, Hayes M, Clarke R, Stewart S, Timblin C, Kendrick D

机构信息

Centre for Academic Primary Care, Lifespan and Population Health, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2RD, UK.

Centre for Academic Primary Care, Lifespan and Population Health, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.

出版信息

Perspect Public Health. 2023 Aug 12:17579139231185999. doi: 10.1177/17579139231185999.

DOI:10.1177/17579139231185999
PMID:37572017
Abstract

AIMS

Unintentional injuries in the home contribute substantially to preschool child morbidity and mortality. Practitioners such as health visitors, family mentors and children's centre staff are well-positioned to facilitate child injury prevention by providing home safety advice to families, and training may enhance their ability to do so. We aimed to assess the impact of child home safety training for these practitioners.

METHODS

An explanatory mixed-methods design was used. Practitioners completed questionnaires before, and up to 7 months after, receiving child home safety training and took part in interviews. Seventy-eight health visitors, 72 family mentors and 11 children's centre staff members completed questionnaires. Items were used to calculate scores on home safety knowledge, confidence to provide home safety advice and belief that child home safety promotion is important. Thematic analysis of interviews with seven health visitors and nine family mentors, open-ended responses to the questionnaires and an additional evaluation form was conducted to explore attendees' perceptions of the training and its impact. In addition, seven health visitors and six children's centre staff who had received no training were interviewed.

RESULTS

Knowledge was greater post-training than pre-training across all participants ( < .001). When practitioner groups were analysed separately, there were significant increases in family mentors' knowledge ( < .001) and belief ( = .016), and health visitors' confidence ( = .0036). Qualitative findings indicated that most training session attendees valued the training, believed their practice relating to child home safety had improved as a result, and felt further similar training sessions would be beneficial. Those who had not attended the sessions described a need for more child home safety training.

CONCLUSIONS

Delivering training to practitioners providing child home safety promotion to families with preschool children can enhance injury prevention knowledge, beliefs and confidence and positively impact on home safety promotion by practitioners.

摘要

目的

家庭中的意外伤害在很大程度上导致了学龄前儿童的发病和死亡。健康访视员、家庭指导员和儿童中心工作人员等从业者能够通过向家庭提供家庭安全建议来促进儿童伤害预防,而培训可能会提高他们这样做的能力。我们旨在评估针对这些从业者的儿童家庭安全培训的效果。

方法

采用解释性混合方法设计。从业者在接受儿童家庭安全培训之前以及之后长达7个月的时间里完成问卷调查,并参与访谈。78名健康访视员、72名家庭指导员和11名儿童中心工作人员完成了问卷调查。问卷项目用于计算家庭安全知识得分、提供家庭安全建议的信心得分以及认为促进儿童家庭安全很重要的信念得分。对7名健康访视员和9名家庭指导员的访谈、问卷的开放式回答以及一份额外的评估表进行了主题分析,以探讨参与者对培训及其影响的看法。此外,还采访了7名未接受培训的健康访视员和6名儿童中心工作人员。

结果

所有参与者在培训后的知识水平均高于培训前(<.001)。当分别分析从业者群体时,家庭指导员的知识(<.001)和信念(=.016)以及健康访视员的信心(=.0036)均有显著提高。定性研究结果表明,大多数参加培训课程的人重视该培训,认为他们在儿童家庭安全方面的实践因此得到了改善,并认为进一步开展类似的培训课程会有益处。那些未参加课程的人表示需要更多的儿童家庭安全培训。

结论

为向有学龄前儿童的家庭提供儿童家庭安全促进服务的从业者提供培训,可以增强伤害预防知识、信念和信心,并对从业者的家庭安全促进工作产生积极影响。

相似文献

1
Evaluating the effect of child home safety training upon three family support practitioner groups: a mixed-methods study.评估儿童家庭安全培训对三个家庭支持从业者群体的效果:一项混合方法研究。
Perspect Public Health. 2023 Aug 12:17579139231185999. doi: 10.1177/17579139231185999.
2
3
The feasibility of using a parenting programme for the prevention of unintentional home injuries in the under-fives: a cluster randomised controlled trial.使用育儿计划预防五岁以下儿童意外伤害的可行性:一项整群随机对照试验。
Health Technol Assess. 2014 Jan;18(3):1-184. doi: 10.3310/hta18030.
4
Better safe than sorry: Evaluating the implementation process of a home-visitation intervention aimed at preventing unintentional childhood injuries in the hospital setting.宁求稳妥,不抱遗憾:评估一项旨在预防医院环境中儿童意外伤害的家访干预措施的实施过程。
Front Health Serv. 2022 Sep 2;2:944367. doi: 10.3389/frhs.2022.944367. eCollection 2022.
5
Injury prevention training: is it effective.伤害预防培训:它有效吗?
Health Educ Res. 1998 Mar;13(1):47-56. doi: 10.1093/her/13.1.47.
6
Effectiveness and experiences of families and support workers participating in peer-led parenting support programs delivered as home visiting programs: a comprehensive systematic review.家庭和支持工作者参与以同伴为主导的育儿支持项目(作为家访项目开展)的有效性和经验:一项全面的系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Oct;14(10):167-208. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-003166.
7
An intervention to improve the quality of life in children of parents with serious mental illness: the Young SMILES feasibility RCT.改善严重精神疾病父母子女生活质量的干预措施:Young SMILES 可行性 RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2020 Nov;24(59):1-136. doi: 10.3310/hta24590.
8
Implementation fidelity of the 'Stay One Step Ahead' home safety intervention: a mixed-methods analysis.“一步领先”家庭安全干预措施的实施保真度:混合方法分析。
Inj Prev. 2023 Aug;29(4):340-346. doi: 10.1136/ip-2023-044855. Epub 2023 May 3.
9
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
10
Knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs of school nurses and personnel and associations with nonmedical immunization exemptions.学校护士及工作人员的知识、态度和信念以及与非医疗免疫豁免的关联。
Pediatrics. 2004 Jun;113(6):e552-9. doi: 10.1542/peds.113.6.e552.