PURPOSE

To compare the efficiency of three-dimensional (3D) and two-dimensional (2D) contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS)-derived techniques in evaluating the ablative margin (AM) after radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

METHODS

In total, 98 patients with 98 HCCs were enrolled. The 2D CEUS point-to-point imaging (2D CEUS-PI) was conducted by comparing the pre- and post-RFA 2D CEUS images manually, and the 3D CEUS fusion imaging (3D CEUS-FI) was conducted by fusing the pre- and post-RFA 3D CEUS images automatically. These two techniques were compared in distinguishing an adequate AM ≥ 5 mm. Risk factors for local tumor progression (LTP) after RFA were analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier method with log-rank test.

RESULTS

The mean registration time of 3D CEUS-FI and 2D CEUS-PI was 5.0 and 9.3 min, respectively (p < 0.0001). The kappa coefficient was 0.680 for agreement between 2D CEUS-PI and 3D CEUS-FI in the evaluation of AM (p < 0.0001). Tumors with AM < 5 mm by 2D CEUS-PI were all identified as AM < 5 mm by 3D CEUS-FI. Nonetheless, 16 (26%) tumors identified as AM ≥ 5 mm by 2D CEUS-PI were re-classified as AM < 5 mm by 3D CEUS-FI. During a median follow-up time of 31.2 months (range, 3.2-66.0 months), LTP was identified in 8 tumors. The estimated 1-/2-/3-year cumulative incidence of LTP was 4.4%, 8.1%, and 10.3%, respectively. Higher estimated cumulative incidence of LTP was identified in tumors with AM < 5 mm by 2D CEUS-PI (at 3-year, 27.2% vs 0%; p < 0.001), and by 3D CEUS-FI (at 3-year, 20.7% vs 0%; p = 0.004).

CONCLUSION

3D CEUS-FI excelled in the evaluation of AM when compared with 2D CEUS-PI. With equivalent efficacy in the prediction of LTP, 3D CEUS-FI was superior to 2D CEUS-PI for its automatic and time-saving procedure.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

3D CEUS fusion imaging may serve as an effective tool in evaluating ablative margin and predicting local tumor progression after RFA in HCC.

KEY POINTS

• Both 2D and 3D CEUS-derived techniques could evaluate ablative margin (AM) after RFA for hepatocellular carcinoma. • 3D CEUS fusion imaging was more precise in the evaluation of AM compared to 2D CEUS point-to-point imaging, with advantages of its automatic and time-saving procedure. • An inadequate AM < 5 mm evaluated by CEUS-derived techniques was the only risk factor of LTP after RFA for hepatocellular carcinoma (p < 0.001 for 2D CEUS point-to-point imaging, and p = 0.004 for 3D CEUS fusion imaging).