Suppr超能文献

马氏体钢中晶格畸变的映射——电子背散射衍射(EBSD)花样不同评估方法的比较

Mapping of lattice distortion in martensitic steel-Comparison of different evaluation methods of EBSD patterns.

作者信息

Cios Grzegorz, Winkelmann Aimo, Nolze Gert, Tokarski Tomasz, Rychłowski Łukasz, Dan Leonid, Bała Piotr

机构信息

Academic Centre for Materials and Nanotechnology, AGH University of Krakow, al. A. Mickiewicza 30, 30-059 Kraków, Poland.

Academic Centre for Materials and Nanotechnology, AGH University of Krakow, al. A. Mickiewicza 30, 30-059 Kraków, Poland.

出版信息

Ultramicroscopy. 2023 Nov;253:113824. doi: 10.1016/j.ultramic.2023.113824. Epub 2023 Aug 3.

Abstract

To visualize the varying tetragonal distortions in high carbon martensitic steels by EBSD, two different approaches have been applied on backscattered Kikuchi diffraction (BKD) patterns. A band-edge refinement technique called Refined Accuracy (RA) (Oxford Instruments) is compared with a technique called Pattern Matching (PM), which optimizes the fit to a simulated BKD signal. RA distinguishes between hypothetical phases of different fixed c/a, while PM determines a best fitting continuous c/a by projective transformation of a master pattern. Both techniques require stored BKD patterns. The sensitivity of the c/a-determination was tested by investigating the microstructure of a ferritic steel with an expected c/a=1. The influence of the Kikuchi pattern noise on c/a was compared for a single or 40 averaged frames per measuring point, and turned out to be not significant. The application of RA and PM on the martensitic microstructure delivered qualitatively similar maps of c/a. The comparison of RA and PM shows that RA is suitably fast and precise during mapping the martensite c/a ratio in analyses of high carbon martensite, especially for fast initial surveys. As RA leads quantitatively to higher noise in c/a, the PM analysis can be used for higher precision results.

摘要

为了通过电子背散射衍射(EBSD)可视化高碳马氏体钢中不同的四方畸变,在背散射菊池衍射(BKD)图上应用了两种不同的方法。将一种称为精确细化(RA)(牛津仪器公司)的带边细化技术与一种称为模式匹配(PM)的技术进行了比较,后者可优化与模拟BKD信号的拟合。RA区分具有不同固定c/a的假设相,而PM通过主模式的投影变换确定最佳拟合的连续c/a。两种技术都需要存储BKD图。通过研究预期c/a = 1的铁素体钢的微观结构来测试c/a测定的灵敏度。比较了每个测量点单个或40个平均帧的菊池图噪声对c/a的影响,结果表明影响不显著。RA和PM在马氏体微观结构上的应用给出了定性相似的c/a图。RA和PM的比较表明,在分析高碳马氏体时,RA在绘制马氏体c/a比时速度合适且精确,特别是对于快速初步调查。由于RA在定量上导致c/a中的噪声更高,因此PM分析可用于获得更高精度的结果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验