Ashfaq Awais, Lorts Angela, Rosenthal David, Adachi Iki, Rossano Joseph, Davies Ryan, Simpson Kathleen E, Maeda Katsuhide, Wisotzkey Bethany, Koehl Devin, Cantor Ryan S, Jacobs Jeffrey P, Peng David, Kirklin James K, Morales David L S
Heart Institute, Johns Hopkins All Children's Hospital, St Petersburg, Florida.
Heart Institute, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio.
Ann Thorac Surg. 2023 Nov;116(5):972-979. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2023.07.039. Epub 2023 Aug 11.
The Pediatric Interagency Registry for Mechanical Circulatory Support (Pedimacs) provides detailed understanding on pediatric patients supported with ventricular assist devices (VADs). We sought to identify important variables affecting mortality in pediatric VADs.
Patients aged <19 years, from 2012 to 2021, were included. Survival analyses were performed using Kaplan-Meier. Parametric hazard modeling was used to identify risk factors for death.
Of the 1109 patients, the most common devices were implantable continuous (IC, 448 [40%]), followed by paracorporeal pulsatile (PP, 306 [28%]), paracorporeal continuous (PC, 293 [26%]), and percutaneous (58 [5%]). Patients with percutaneous device, infants, congenital heart disease, biventricular support, and Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support profile 1 had worse overall survival at 6 months. Positive outcome was 83% at 6 months. Consistent with their cohort composition, device type positive outcomes at 6 months were IC, 92%; PP, 84%; and PC, 69%. Parametric hazard modeling for overall survival showed an early hazard for death with biventricular support, congenital heart disease (CHD), intubation before implantation, PC device, and renal impairment, whereas a constant hazard was associated with ascites. For patients <10 kg, parametric modeling showed an early hazard for CHD, intubation, and renal impairment. Modeling in CHD patients showed an early hazard for biventricular support, renal impairment, and use of PC/PP devices.
This multivariable analysis of the complete Pedimacs database demonstrates that illness at VAD implantation, diagnosis, and strategy of support affect survival and differ by device type. We hope this is the first step in creating a predictive tool to help providers and families have informed expectations.
儿科机械循环支持机构间注册中心(Pedimacs)提供了关于接受心室辅助装置(VAD)支持的儿科患者的详细信息。我们试图确定影响儿科VAD患者死亡率的重要变量。
纳入2012年至2021年年龄小于19岁的患者。使用Kaplan-Meier进行生存分析。参数风险模型用于确定死亡的危险因素。
在1109例患者中,最常用的装置是植入式连续流(IC,448例[40%]),其次是体外搏动流(PP,306例[28%])、体外连续流(PC,293例[26%])和经皮装置(58例[5%])。使用经皮装置的患者、婴儿、患有先天性心脏病、接受双心室支持以及机械辅助循环支持机构间注册中心资料1的患者在6个月时的总体生存率较差。6个月时的良好结局率为83%。与其队列组成一致,6个月时不同装置类型的良好结局率分别为:IC,92%;PP,84%;PC,69%。总体生存的参数风险模型显示,双心室支持、先天性心脏病(CHD)、植入前插管、PC装置和肾功能损害会导致早期死亡风险,而腹水与持续风险相关。对于体重<10 kg的患者,参数模型显示CHD、插管和肾功能损害会导致早期死亡风险。对CHD患者的建模显示,双心室支持、肾功能损害以及使用PC/PP装置会导致早期死亡风险。
对完整的Pedimacs数据库进行的这项多变量分析表明,VAD植入时的病情、诊断和支持策略会影响生存率,且因装置类型而异。我们希望这是创建预测工具的第一步,以帮助医护人员和家庭形成合理的预期。