The George Institute for Global Health, UNSW, Sydney, Australia; Nepean and Blue Mountains Local Health District, Kingswood, Australia.
The George Institute for Global Health, UNSW, Sydney, Australia; Malcolm Fisher Department of Intensive Care, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, NSW, Australia.
Aust Crit Care. 2024 Mar;37(2):265-272. doi: 10.1016/j.aucc.2023.07.003. Epub 2023 Aug 12.
The objective of this study was to determine the association between gender and perceived gender equity in the critical care workforce and other health specialties.
We conducted an online cross-sectional survey between September and November 2020. Data on demographics and perceptions of equity including the representation of women across departments and in leadership roles, knowledge of and access to flexible work practices and carers leave, and opportunities for promotion were collected.
The study population included health professionals from critical care (defined as intensive care and emergency) and other specialties. We conducted a descriptive gender-disaggregated analysis.
A total of 478 respondents (70% women) completed the survey. The mean age of respondents was 43.9 ± 11.2 years. Approximately half of respondents were medical practitioners (n = 235, 54%), followed by nurses (n = 135, 36%)-the remainder were from other professions. The critical care workforce accounted for 280 (64%) of responder practice settings. Statistically significant differences were reported between genders on issues such as having confidence that their department would resolve equity issues (87 [70.7%] men vs. 146 [48.2%] women; p = 0.007), access to flexible work practices (5/124 [4.0%] men vs. 20/305 [6.6%] women p = 0.001), and taking unpaid leave for carer responsibilities (91 [30.3%] women vs 9 [7.4%] men, p < 0.001).
This work highlights differences in how men and women perceive gender equity, particularly in the critical care workforce. These findings are important to understand health care practitioners' perceptions of gender equity, as these perceptions inform behaviour.
本研究旨在确定重症监护和其他卫生专业人员中性别与感知性别公平之间的关系。
我们于 2020 年 9 月至 11 月期间进行了一项在线横断面调查。收集了人口统计学数据和公平感知数据,包括各部门和领导层中的女性代表人数、对弹性工作实践和护理假的了解程度和获取途径,以及晋升机会。
研究人群包括来自重症监护(定义为重症监护和急诊)和其他专业的卫生专业人员。我们进行了性别分类分析。
共有 478 名(70%为女性)受访者完成了调查。受访者的平均年龄为 43.9 ± 11.2 岁。大约一半的受访者为医生(n=235,54%),其次是护士(n=135,36%)-其余的来自其他专业。重症监护人员占 280 名(64%)受访者的工作场所。在一些问题上,如对自己所在部门解决公平问题的信心(87 [70.7%]男性 vs. 146 [48.2%]女性;p=0.007)、获取弹性工作实践的途径(5/124 [4.0%]男性 vs. 20/305 [6.6%]女性;p=0.001)和因照顾责任而休无薪假(91 [30.3%]女性 vs. 9 [7.4%]男性;p<0.001),报告存在性别差异。
这项工作突出了男性和女性对性别公平的看法存在差异,特别是在重症监护领域。这些发现对于了解医疗保健从业者对性别公平的看法很重要,因为这些看法会影响行为。