Kim Grace E, Siddiqui Uzma D
Section of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
Center for Endoscopic Research and Therapeutics, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
VideoGIE. 2023 Jul 22;8(8):330-335. doi: 10.1016/j.vgie.2023.05.006. eCollection 2023 Aug.
Duodenal polyps have a reported incidence of 0.3% to 4.6%. Sporadic, nonampullary duodenal adenomas (SNDAs) comprise less than 10% of all duodenal polyps, and ampullary adenomas are even less common. Nonetheless, the incidence continues to rise because of widespread endoscopy use. Duodenal polyps with villous features or those that are larger than 10 mm may raise concern for malignancy and require removal. We demonstrate endoscopic resection of SNDAs and ampullary adenomas using some of our preferred techniques.
The duodenum has several components that can make EMR of duodenal polyps technically challenging. Not only does the duodenum have a thin muscle layer, but it is also highly mobile and vascular, which may explain higher rates of perforation and bleeding of duodenal EMR reported in the literature compared with colon EMR. A standard adult gastroscope with a distal cap is commonly used for duodenal EMRs. Based on the location, however, side-viewing duodenoscopes or pediatric colonoscopes may be used. To prepare for EMR, a submucosal injection is performed for an adequate lift. The polyp is then resected via stiff monofilament snares and subsequently closed with hemostatic clips if feasible. The ampullectomy technique differs slightly from duodenal EMRs and carries the additional risk of pancreatitis. Submucosal injection in the ampulla may not lift well; thus, its utility is debatable. Biliary sphincterotomy should be performed, and based on endoscopist preference, the pancreatic duct (PD) guidewire can be left during resection to maintain access. After resection, a PD stent is placed to minimize pancreatitis risk.
The video shows the aforementioned duodenal EMR techniques. Two clips of ampullectomy are also shown in the video.
A few common techniques used to perform duodenal EMR and ampullectomy are highlighted in the video. It is important to understand and manage adverse events associated with these procedures and to have established surveillance plans.
十二指肠息肉的报告发病率为0.3%至4.6%。散发性非壶腹十二指肠腺瘤(SNDAs)占所有十二指肠息肉的比例不到10%,壶腹腺瘤则更为少见。尽管如此,由于内镜检查的广泛应用,其发病率仍在持续上升。具有绒毛特征或直径大于10毫米的十二指肠息肉可能引发恶性肿瘤担忧,需要切除。我们展示了使用一些我们偏爱的技术对SNDAs和壶腹腺瘤进行内镜切除。
十二指肠有几个部分,这使得十二指肠息肉的内镜黏膜下剥离术(EMR)在技术上具有挑战性。十二指肠不仅肌层薄,而且活动度高且血管丰富,这可能解释了与结肠EMR相比,文献报道的十二指肠EMR穿孔和出血发生率更高的原因。标准的带远端帽的成人胃镜通常用于十二指肠EMR。然而,根据息肉位置,也可使用侧视十二指肠镜或小儿结肠镜。为进行EMR做准备,需进行黏膜下注射以充分抬举病变。然后通过硬单丝圈套器切除息肉,若可行,随后用止血夹封闭创面。壶腹切除术技术与十二指肠EMR略有不同,且有胰腺炎的额外风险。壶腹的黏膜下注射可能抬举效果不佳,因此其效用存在争议。应进行胆管括约肌切开术,根据内镜医师的偏好,切除过程中可留置胰管(PD)导丝以保持通路。切除后,放置PD支架以将胰腺炎风险降至最低。
视频展示了上述十二指肠EMR技术。视频中还展示了两段壶腹切除术片段。
视频中突出了用于进行十二指肠EMR和壶腹切除术的一些常用技术。了解并处理与这些操作相关的不良事件以及制定既定的监测计划很重要。