Khurshid Nabila, Khurshid Jamila, Munir Fozia, Ali Kashif
Department of Economics, Comsats University Islamabad, Pakistan.
Department of Business Administration, University of the Poonch, Rawalakot, Azad Kashmir, Pakistan.
Heliyon. 2023 Jul 27;9(8):e18630. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e18630. eCollection 2023 Aug.
Climate change is raising widespread anxiety, especially in countries that are more vulnerable to environmental disasters. Energy use leads to an increase in Greenhouse gases, especially carbon emissions, which is responsible for environmental degradation. Identifying cultural and economic factors that impact sustainability courses is critical in this context for dealing with ecologically demanding challenges. Education and knowledge spillover in the form of foreign direct investment has long been seen as an effective method of disseminating knowledge, ideas, and behaviors that aid in environmental protection and improve ecological consciousness. This study investigates how energy consumption (LEC), educational expenditure (EDEXP), and knowledge spillover (KNO) affect sustainable development (SD) in the case of Pakistan. This study employs the Non-linear Autoregressive Distributive Lag Model (NARDL) over a data span of 41 years i.e., from 1980 to 2021. The estimations unveil that shocks in educational expenditure pose different results. EDEXP_POSE increases sustainability (0.807 units) while EDEXP-NEG decreases sustainability (0.931 units) while KPO_POS and KPO_NEG positively (0.200 units and 0.011 units respectively) affect environmental sustainability. On the other hand, LEC_POS negatively (1.685 units) affects sustainability while LEC_NEG positively (0.867 units) affects Sustainable growth. Energy consumption has a negative impact on sustainability; thus, the government should prioritize the production of renewable energy sources and support the spread of knowledge that is good for the environment. The government may think about putting tariffs on businesses who import non-green technology since it has a significant and advantageous impact on the environment.
气候变化引发了广泛的焦虑,尤其是在那些更容易遭受环境灾难的国家。能源使用导致温室气体增加,特别是碳排放,这是环境退化的原因。在这种背景下,识别影响可持续发展课程的文化和经济因素对于应对生态要求苛刻的挑战至关重要。长期以来,以外国直接投资形式出现的教育和知识溢出一直被视为传播有助于环境保护和提高生态意识的知识、思想和行为的有效方法。本研究调查了在巴基斯坦的情况下,能源消耗(LEC)、教育支出(EDEXP)和知识溢出(KNO)如何影响可持续发展(SD)。本研究在1980年至2021年的41年数据跨度上采用非线性自回归分布滞后模型(NARDL)。估计结果表明,教育支出的冲击会产生不同的结果。EDEXP_POSE增加可持续性(0.807个单位),而EDEXP_NEG降低可持续性(0.931个单位),而KPO_POS和KPO_NEG分别正向(0.200个单位和0.011个单位)影响环境可持续性。另一方面,LEC_POS对可持续性有负面影响(1.685个单位),而LEC_NEG对可持续增长有正向影响(0.867个单位)。能源消耗对可持续性有负面影响;因此,政府应优先生产可再生能源,并支持有利于环境的知识传播。政府可以考虑对进口非绿色技术的企业征收关税,因为这对环境有重大且有利的影响。