• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

关于综合医疗单元跨专业协作的不同专业视角:一项混合方法研究。

Differing Professional Perspectives on the Interprofessional Collaboration in IPUs: A Mixed-methods Study.

作者信息

van Staalduinen Dorine J, van den Bekerom Petra E A, Groeneveld Sandra M, Franx Arie, Stiggelbout Anne M, van den Akker-van Marle M Elske

机构信息

Medical Decision Making, Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA, Leiden, The Netherlands.

Institute of Public Administration, Leiden University, Turfmarkt 99, 2511 DP, Den Haag, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Int J Integr Care. 2023 Aug 10;23(3):5. doi: 10.5334/ijic.7516. eCollection 2023 Jul-Sep.

DOI:10.5334/ijic.7516
PMID:37577143
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10418149/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

An important aspect of Value-Based Healthcare (VBHC) is providing the full cycle of care for a specific medical condition through interprofessional collaboration. This requires employees from diverse professional backgrounds to interact, but there is limited knowledge on how professionals perceive such interprofessional collaboration. We aimed to provide insight into how different professionals perceive Integrated Practice Unit (IPU) composition and what factors influence the quality of interprofessional collaboration within IPUs.

METHODS

A survey was administered to employees from different professional backgrounds (medical specialists, nurses, allied health professionals, administrative employees) working in IPUs to assess their perception of the composition of their IPU and the quality of the interactions. Subsequently, semi-structured interviews were conducted to gain a deeper understanding of the findings of the survey.

RESULTS

Medical specialists and nurses were most frequently considered to be part of an IPU and indicated that they have high quality interactions. Allied health professionals were less often considered part of the team by all other professional groups and all report low quality interaction with this group. The extent to which a professional group is perceived as a team member depends on their visibility, involvement in the treatment of the patient, and shared interest. Differences in the quality of interprofessional collaboration are influenced by organizational structures, knowledge of each other's expertise, and by ways of communication.

CONCLUSIONS

In VBHC, there seems to be a lack of common perception of an IPU's composition and a failure to always achieve high quality interprofessional collaboration. Given the importance of interprofessional collaboration in VBHC, effort should be invested in achieving a shared understanding and improved collaboration.

摘要

引言

基于价值的医疗保健(VBHC)的一个重要方面是通过跨专业协作提供针对特定医疗状况的全周期护理。这要求来自不同专业背景的员工进行互动,但对于专业人员如何看待这种跨专业协作的了解有限。我们旨在深入了解不同专业人员如何看待综合实践单元(IPU)的组成以及哪些因素影响IPU内跨专业协作的质量。

方法

对在IPU工作的不同专业背景的员工(医学专家、护士、专职医疗人员、行政人员)进行了一项调查,以评估他们对其IPU组成的看法以及互动质量。随后进行了半结构化访谈,以更深入地理解调查结果。

结果

医学专家和护士最常被视为IPU的一部分,并表示他们有高质量的互动。专职医疗人员被所有其他专业组视为团队成员的频率较低,并且所有人都报告与该组的互动质量较低。一个专业组被视为团队成员的程度取决于他们的可见度、对患者治疗的参与度以及共同兴趣。跨专业协作质量的差异受组织结构、对彼此专业知识的了解以及沟通方式的影响。

结论

在VBHC中,似乎对IPU的组成缺乏共同认识,并且并非总能实现高质量的跨专业协作。鉴于跨专业协作在VBHC中的重要性,应投入精力以达成共同理解并改善协作。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e4e4/10418149/bbc4d5a4b46b/ijic-23-3-7516-g1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e4e4/10418149/bbc4d5a4b46b/ijic-23-3-7516-g1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e4e4/10418149/bbc4d5a4b46b/ijic-23-3-7516-g1.jpg

相似文献

1
Differing Professional Perspectives on the Interprofessional Collaboration in IPUs: A Mixed-methods Study.关于综合医疗单元跨专业协作的不同专业视角:一项混合方法研究。
Int J Integr Care. 2023 Aug 10;23(3):5. doi: 10.5334/ijic.7516. eCollection 2023 Jul-Sep.
2
Relational coordination in value-based health care.基于价值的医疗保健中的关系协调。
Health Care Manage Rev. 2023;48(4):334-341. doi: 10.1097/HMR.0000000000000381. Epub 2023 Aug 19.
3
Interprofessional collaboration within fluid teams: Community nurses' experiences with palliative home care.多专业协作的流动团队:社区护士在姑息治疗居家护理中的体验。
J Clin Nurs. 2019 Oct;28(19-20):3680-3690. doi: 10.1111/jocn.14969. Epub 2019 Jul 5.
4
Healthcare professionals' perceptions about interprofessional teamwork: a national survey within Swedish child healthcare services.医护专业人员对跨专业团队合作的看法:瑞典儿童保健服务中的全国性调查。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Mar 22;21(1):265. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06139-3.
5
Interprofessional collaboration within general practice teams following the inclusion of non-dispensing pharmacists.纳入非配药药剂师后全科医疗团队内部的跨专业协作。
J Pharm Policy Pract. 2023 Mar 21;16(1):49. doi: 10.1186/s40545-023-00550-3.
6
Advancing medical education: connecting interprofessional collaboration and education opportunities with integrative medicine initiatives to build shared learning.推进医学教育:将跨专业协作与教育机会与整合医学倡议相联系,以建立共同学习。
J Complement Integr Med. 2016 Dec 1;13(4):347-355. doi: 10.1515/jcim-2016-0002.
7
Exploring healthcare professionals' perceptions of the anesthesia assistant role and its impact on patients and interprofessional collaboration.探索医疗保健专业人员对麻醉助理角色及其对患者和跨专业协作影响的看法。
J Interprof Care. 2018 Jan;32(1):24-32. doi: 10.1080/13561820.2017.1379960. Epub 2017 Oct 30.
8
Interprofessional collaboration in the ICU: how to define?重症监护病房中的多专业协作:如何定义?
Nurs Crit Care. 2011 Jan-Feb;16(1):5-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1478-5153.2010.00398.x.
9
Patients' perspectives on interprofessional collaboration between health care professionals during hospitalization: a qualitative systematic review.患者对住院期间医护专业人员跨专业协作的看法:一项定性系统评价
JBI Evid Synth. 2020 Jun;18(6):1208-1270. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-D-19-00121.
10
Factors Influencing the Implementation of Interprofessional Collaborative Practice in Teaching Hospital Setting: A Mixed-Method Study.影响教学医院环境中跨专业协作实践实施的因素:一项混合方法研究。
J Adv Med Educ Prof. 2023 Oct;11(4):213-221. doi: 10.30476/JAMP.2023.98987.1821.

引用本文的文献

1
Costs in value-based health care dashboards: a qualitative study on stakeholder requirements.基于价值的医疗保健仪表盘成本:关于利益相关者需求的定性研究
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Aug 18;25(1):1103. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-13054-4.
2
Integrated patient-centred care for type 2 diabetes in Singapore Primary Care Networks: a mixed-methods study.新加坡基层医疗保健网络中 2 型糖尿病的以患者为中心的综合护理:一项混合方法研究。
BMJ Open. 2024 Jun 18;14(6):e083992. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-083992.
3
Differences in the knowledge, attitudes, and needs of caregivers and healthcare providers regarding palliative care: a cross-sectional investigation in pediatric settings in China.

本文引用的文献

1
Redesigning value-based hospital structures: a qualitative study on value-based health care in the Netherlands.基于价值的医院结构再设计:荷兰基于价值的医疗保健定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Sep 22;22(1):1193. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08564-4.
2
The implementation of value-based healthcare: a scoping review.基于价值的医疗保健的实施:范围综述。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Mar 1;22(1):270. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-07489-2.
3
Value-Based Healthcare From the Perspective of the Healthcare Professional: A Systematic Literature Review.
中国儿科环境中照顾者与医疗服务提供者在姑息治疗方面的知识、态度及需求差异:一项横断面调查
BMC Nurs. 2024 Jun 6;23(1):386. doi: 10.1186/s12912-024-02052-2.
基于价值的医疗保健:医疗专业人员的视角——系统文献回顾。
Front Public Health. 2022 Jan 13;9:800702. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.800702. eCollection 2021.
4
Allied health professionals' perceptions of interprofessional collaboration in primary health care: an integrative review.卫生保健专业人员对初级卫生保健中跨专业合作的看法:综合评价。
J Interprof Care. 2021 Mar-Apr;35(2):217-228. doi: 10.1080/13561820.2020.1732311. Epub 2020 Apr 16.
5
Findings From FMAHealth's Bright Spots in Practice Transformation Project.FMAHealth实践转型项目中的亮点发现。
Fam Med. 2019 Feb;51(2):137-142. doi: 10.22454/FamMed.2019.163860.
6
What do doctors mean when they talk about teamwork? Possible implications for interprofessional care.医生在谈论团队合作时是什么意思?对跨专业护理的潜在影响。
J Interprof Care. 2019 Nov-Dec;33(6):714-723. doi: 10.1080/13561820.2018.1538943. Epub 2018 Oct 26.
7
Communication and Relational Ties in Inter-Professional Teams in Norwegian Specialized Health Care: A Multicentre Study of Relational Coordination.挪威专科医疗保健领域跨专业团队中的沟通与关系纽带:关系协调的多中心研究
Int J Integr Care. 2018 Apr 27;18(2):9. doi: 10.5334/ijic.3432.
8
Recognising the importance of informal communication events in improving collaborative care.认识到非正式沟通活动在改善协作护理方面的重要性。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2019 Apr;28(4):289-295. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2017-007441. Epub 2018 Aug 18.
9
The need to succeed - learning experiences resulting from the implementation of value-based healthcare.对成功的需求——基于价值的医疗保健实施所带来的学习经验。
Leadersh Health Serv (Bradf Engl). 2018 Feb 5;31(1):2-16. doi: 10.1108/LHS-08-2016-0039. Epub 2017 Oct 25.
10
Who is on the primary care team? Professionals' perceptions of the conceptualization of teams and the underlying factors: a mixed-methods study.初级保健团队中有哪些成员?专业人员对团队概念化及潜在因素的看法:一项混合方法研究。
BMC Fam Pract. 2017 Dec 28;18(1):111. doi: 10.1186/s12875-017-0685-2.