Nakamura Tomoaki, Yoshida Tatsuya, Takeyasu Yuki, Masuda Ken, Sinno Yuki, Matsumoto Yuji, Okuma Yusuke, Goto Yasushi, Horinouchi Hidehito, Yamamoto Noboru, Ohe Yuichiro
Department of Thoracic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Thoracic Center, St. Luke's International Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2023 Jul 31;12(7):1436-1444. doi: 10.21037/tlcr-23-10. Epub 2023 Jun 30.
Crizotinib has been approved for C-ros oncogene 1 (- and anaplastic lymphoma kinase -rearranged non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. Few studies have examined the differences in crizotinib treatment outcomes between these patients and the progression sites during treatment. We investigated the metastatic spread, crizotinib efficacy, and progression patterns during crizotinib treatment in - and rearranged NSCLC patients.
We retrospectively reviewed crizotinib-treated - and -rearranged NSCLC patients between January 2011 and March 2021. Patient characteristics, clinical outcomes, and progression patterns during treatment were collected from medical records. The metastasis extent, crizotinib response, and progression patterns between the groups were compared.
We identified 26 patients with - and 42 with -positive NSCLC. The baseline proportion of central nervous system (CNS) metastases did not differ between the groups (12% 29%, P=0.10), but the proportion of extrathoracic metastases, including CNS metastases, was significantly higher in -positive than in -positive NSCLC patients (35% 71%, P=0.003). Regarding the response to crizotinib, the objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), or overall survival (OS) did not significantly differ between the groups ( , ORR: 69% 69%, P=0.987; PFS: median 10.9 10.7 months, P=0.232; median OS: not reached 67.7 months, P=0.495). The CNS was the most common metastasis site in both groups [ , 69% (11/16) 46% (17/37), P=0.127], and the cumulative incidence of CNS metastasis did not differ between the groups (P=0.914).
Crizotinib treatment outcomes, including progression patterns, were similar between - and -positive NSCLC patients.
克唑替尼已被批准用于治疗C-ros癌基因1(ROS1)重排和间变性淋巴瘤激酶(ALK)重排的非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者。很少有研究探讨这些患者之间克唑替尼治疗结果的差异以及治疗期间的进展部位。我们调查了ROS1重排和ALK重排的NSCLC患者在克唑替尼治疗期间的转移扩散、克唑替尼疗效和进展模式。
我们回顾性分析了2011年1月至2021年3月期间接受克唑替尼治疗的ROS1重排和ALK重排的NSCLC患者。从病历中收集患者特征、临床结果和治疗期间的进展模式。比较两组之间的转移范围、克唑替尼反应和进展模式。
我们确定了26例ROS1重排和42例ALK阳性的NSCLC患者。两组中枢神经系统(CNS)转移的基线比例无差异(12%对29%,P=0.10),但包括CNS转移在内的胸外转移比例在ALK阳性NSCLC患者中显著高于ROS1重排患者(35%对71%,P=0.003)。关于对克唑替尼的反应,两组之间的客观缓解率(ORR)、无进展生存期(PFS)或总生存期(OS)无显著差异(ROS1组对ALK组,ORR:69%对69%,P=0.987;PFS:中位10.9个月对10.7个月,P=0.232;中位OS:未达到对67.7个月,P=0.495)。CNS是两组中最常见的转移部位[ROS1组对ALK组,69%(11/16)对46%(17/37),P=0.127],两组之间CNS转移的累积发生率无差异(P=0.914)。
ROS1重排和ALK阳性的NSCLC患者在克唑替尼治疗结果(包括进展模式)方面相似。