Red Cap Consulting, Lake Point, Utah, USA.
NiPERA Inc., Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Integr Environ Assess Manag. 2024 Jul;20(4):924-951. doi: 10.1002/ieam.4827. Epub 2023 Sep 15.
In 2007, the USEPA issued its "Framework for Metals Risk Assessment." The framework provides technical guidance to risk assessors and regulators when performing human health and environmental risk assessments of metals. This article focuses on advances in the science including assessing bioavailability in aquatic ecosystems, short- and long-term fate of metals in aquatic ecosystems, and advances in risk assessment of metals in sediments. Notable advances have occurred in the development of bioavailability models for assessing toxicity as a function of water chemistry in freshwater ecosystems. The biotic ligand model (BLM), the multiple linear regression model, and multimetal BLM now exist for most of the common mono- and divalent metals. Species sensitivity distributions for many metals exist, making it possible for many jurisdictions to develop or update their water quality criteria or guidelines. The understanding of the fate of metals in the environment has undergone significant scrutiny over the past 20 years. Transport and toxicity models have evolved including the Unit World Model allowing for estimation of concentrations of metals in various compartments as a function of loading and time. There has been significant focus on the transformation of metals in sediments into forms that are less bioavailable and on understanding conditions that result in resolubilization or redistribution of metals in and from sediments. Methods for spiking sediments have advanced such that the resulting chemistry in the laboratory mimics that in natural systems. Sediment bioavailability models are emerging including models that allow for prediction of toxicity in sediments for copper and nickel. Biodynamic models have been developed for several organisms and many metals. The models allow for estimates of transport of metals from sediments to organisms via their diet as well as their water exposure. All these advances expand the tool set available to risk assessors. Integr Environ Assess Manag 2024;20:924-951. © 2023 The Authors. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society of Environmental Toxicology & Chemistry (SETAC).
2007 年,美国环保署发布了《金属风险评估框架》。该框架为风险评估人员和监管机构在对金属进行人类健康和环境风险评估时提供了技术指导。本文重点介绍了科学方面的进展,包括评估水生生态系统中的生物可利用性、金属在水生生态系统中的短期和长期命运,以及沉积物中金属风险评估的进展。在开发用于评估淡水生态系统中水生化学物质毒性的生物可利用性模型方面取得了显著进展。生物配体模型(BLM)、多元线性回归模型和多金属 BLM 现在已经存在于大多数常见的单价和二价金属中。许多金属的物种敏感性分布已经存在,使得许多司法管辖区能够开发或更新其水质标准或指南。在过去的 20 年中,金属在环境中的命运受到了广泛的关注。包括单元世界模型在内的运输和毒性模型已经发展起来,可以根据负荷和时间估算各种隔室中金属的浓度。人们非常关注金属在沉积物中的转化,使其转化为生物利用度较低的形式,并了解导致金属在沉积物中再溶解或重新分布的条件。添加沉积物的方法已经得到了改进,使得实验室中的化学性质与自然系统中的化学性质相似。沉积物生物可利用性模型正在出现,包括可以预测铜和镍沉积物毒性的模型。已经为几种生物体和许多金属开发了生物动力学模型。这些模型允许估计金属通过其饮食以及水暴露从沉积物向生物体的运输。所有这些进展都扩大了风险评估人员可用的工具集。综合环境评估与管理 2024;20:924-951。©2023 作者。综合环境评估与管理由 Wiley 期刊 LLC 代表环境毒理与化学学会(SETAC)出版。