Suppr超能文献

自我相关性预测通过神经风格迁移生成的真实和合成艺术品的审美吸引力。

Self-Relevance Predicts the Aesthetic Appeal of Real and Synthetic Artworks Generated via Neural Style Transfer.

机构信息

Department of Neuroscience, Max Planck Institute for Empirical Aesthetics.

Neurocognitive Developmental Psychology, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg.

出版信息

Psychol Sci. 2023 Sep;34(9):1007-1023. doi: 10.1177/09567976231188107. Epub 2023 Aug 14.

Abstract

What determines the aesthetic appeal of artworks? Recent work suggests that aesthetic appeal can, to some extent, be predicted from a visual artwork's image features. Yet a large fraction of variance in aesthetic ratings remains unexplained and may relate to individual preferences. We hypothesized that an artwork's aesthetic appeal depends strongly on self-relevance. In a first study ( = 33 adults, online replication = 208), rated aesthetic appeal for real artworks was positively predicted by rated self-relevance. In a second experiment ( = 45 online), we created synthetic, self-relevant artworks using deep neural networks that transferred the style of existing artworks to photographs. Style transfer was applied to self-relevant photographs selected to reflect participant-specific attributes such as autobiographical memories. Self-relevant, synthetic artworks were rated as more aesthetically appealing than matched control images, at a level similar to human-made artworks. Thus, self-relevance is a key determinant of aesthetic appeal, independent of artistic skill and image features.

摘要

是什么决定了艺术作品的审美吸引力?最近的研究表明,艺术作品的审美吸引力在一定程度上可以从其图像特征来预测。然而,审美评价的很大一部分差异仍然无法解释,可能与个体偏好有关。我们假设艺术作品的审美吸引力强烈取决于自我相关性。在第一项研究中(n=33 名成年人,在线重复实验 n=208),对真实艺术品的审美吸引力的评价与自我相关性的评价呈正相关。在第二项实验中(n=45 名在线参与者),我们使用深度神经网络创建了具有自我相关性的合成艺术品,这些艺术品将现有的艺术作品的风格转移到了照片上。风格转移应用于自我相关的照片,这些照片是根据参与者特定的属性(如自传记忆)选择的。与匹配的对照图像相比,具有自我相关性的合成艺术品被评为更具审美吸引力,其水平与人为艺术品相似。因此,自我相关性是审美吸引力的一个关键决定因素,独立于艺术技巧和图像特征。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

1
An extended Chinese social evaluative word list.一份扩展的中文社会评价词表。
Behav Res Methods. 2025 Jul 25;57(9):236. doi: 10.3758/s13428-025-02760-w.
5
Consensus and contention in beauty judgment.审美判断中的共识与争议。
iScience. 2024 Jun 8;27(7):110213. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2024.110213. eCollection 2024 Jul 19.
7
Metaphors or mechanism? Predictive coding and a (brief) history of empirical study of the arts.隐喻还是机制?预测编码与艺术经验研究简史。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2024 Jan 29;379(1895):20220427. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2022.0427. Epub 2023 Dec 18.

本文引用的文献

7
Global Image Properties Predict Ratings of Affective Pictures.全局图像属性可预测情感图片的评分。
Front Psychol. 2020 May 12;11:953. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00953. eCollection 2020.
8
Quantifying idiosyncratic and shared contributions to judgment.量化判断的个体差异和共同贡献。
Behav Res Methods. 2020 Aug;52(4):1428-1444. doi: 10.3758/s13428-019-01323-0.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验