Suppr超能文献

依他佐辛与咪达唑仑增强口服抗抑郁药治疗重度抑郁症疗效的比较:一项先导随机临床试验。

Esketamine vs Midazolam in Boosting the Efficacy of Oral Antidepressants for Major Depressive Disorder: A Pilot Randomized Clinical Trial.

机构信息

Beijing Key Laboratory of Mental Disorders, National Clinical Research Center for Mental Disorders & National Center for Mental Disorders, Beijing Anding Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.

Advanced Innovation Center for Human Brain Protection, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.

出版信息

JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Aug 1;6(8):e2328817. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.28817.

Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Loss of a previously effective response while still using adequate antidepressant treatment occurs in a relatively high proportion of patients with major depressive disorder (MDD); therefore, there is a need to develop novel effective treatment strategies.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the efficacy and safety of a single subanesthetic dose of esketamine in boosting the efficacy of oral antidepressants for treating fluctuating antidepressant response in MDD.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This single-center, double-blind, midazolam-controlled pilot randomized clinical trial was conducted at Beijing Anding Hospital, Capital Medical University in China. The study enrolled participants aged 18 years and older with fluctuating antidepressant response, defined as patients with MDD experiencing fluctuating symptoms after symptom relief and stabilization. Patient recruitment was conducted from August 2021 to January 2022, and participants were followed-up for 6 weeks. Data were analyzed as intention-to-treat from July to September 2022.

INTERVENTIONS

All participants in the esketamine-treated group received intravenous esketamine at 0.2 mg/kg in 40 minutes. Participants in the midazolam control group received intravenous midazolam at 0.045 mg/kg in 40 minutes.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary outcome was the response rate at 2 weeks, defined as a 50% reduction in Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS). Secondary outcomes included response rate at 6 weeks, remission rates at 2 and 6 weeks, and change in MADRS and Clinical Global Impression-Severity score from baseline to 6 weeks; remission was defined by a MADRS score of 10 or lower.

RESULTS

A total of 30 patients (median [IQR] age, 28.0 [24.0-40.0] years; 17 [56.7%] female) were randomized, including 15 patients randomized to midazolam and 15 patients randomized to esketamine; 29 patients completed the study. Response rates at 2 weeks were significantly higher in the esketamine-treated group than in the midazolam control group (10 patients [66.7%] vs 1 patient [6.7%]; P < .001). Participants treated with esketamine experienced significantly greater reduction in MADRS score from baseline to 2 weeks compared with those treated with midazolam (mean [SD] reduction, 15.7 [1.5] vs 3.1 [1.3]; P < .001). No serious adverse events were observed in this trial, and no psychotogenic effects and clinically significant manic symptoms were reported.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

This pilot randomized clinical trial found that a single subanesthetic dose of esketamine could boost the efficacy of oral antidepressants in treating fluctuating antidepressant response, with a good safety profile.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Chinese Clinical Trial Registry Identifier: ChiCTR2100050335.

摘要

重要性

在使用足够的抗抑郁药物治疗的情况下,仍有相当一部分重度抑郁症(MDD)患者出现先前有效的反应丧失;因此,需要开发新的有效治疗策略。

目的

评估单次亚麻醉剂量的依他佐辛在增强口服抗抑郁药治疗 MDD 波动型抗抑郁反应中的疗效和安全性。

设计、地点和参与者:这是一项在中国首都医科大学附属北京安定医院进行的单中心、双盲、咪达唑仑对照的先导随机临床试验。该研究纳入了年龄在 18 岁及以上、存在波动型抗抑郁反应的患者,定义为在症状缓解和稳定后出现症状波动的 MDD 患者。患者招募于 2021 年 8 月至 2022 年 1 月进行,参与者随访 6 周。数据分析为 2022 年 7 月至 9 月的意向治疗。

干预措施

依他佐辛治疗组的所有参与者均接受静脉注射依他佐辛 0.2mg/kg,持续 40 分钟。咪达唑仑对照组的参与者接受静脉注射咪达唑仑 0.045mg/kg,持续 40 分钟。

主要结局和测量指标

主要结局为 2 周时的反应率,定义为蒙哥马利-Åsberg 抑郁评定量表(MADRS)评分降低 50%。次要结局包括 6 周时的反应率、2 周和 6 周时的缓解率,以及从基线到 6 周时 MADRS 和临床总体印象严重程度评分的变化;缓解定义为 MADRS 评分低于或等于 10。

结果

共有 30 名患者(中位数[IQR]年龄,28.0[24.0-40.0]岁;17[56.7%]女性)被随机分组,其中 15 名患者被随机分入咪达唑仑组,15 名患者被随机分入依他佐辛组;29 名患者完成了研究。依他佐辛治疗组的 2 周时反应率明显高于咪达唑仑对照组(10 名[66.7%]患者 vs 1 名[6.7%]患者;P<0.001)。与咪达唑仑组相比,依他佐辛治疗组患者的 MADRS 评分从基线到 2 周时的下降幅度明显更大(平均[SD]下降,15.7[1.5]分 vs 3.1[1.3]分;P<0.001)。该试验未观察到严重不良事件,也未报告致幻作用和临床显著躁狂症状。

结论和相关性

这项先导随机临床试验发现,单次亚麻醉剂量的依他佐辛可以增强口服抗抑郁药治疗波动型抗抑郁反应的疗效,且具有良好的安全性。

试验注册

中国临床试验注册中心标识符:ChiCTR2100050335。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/77d2/10425830/8c13927940c2/jamanetwopen-e2328817-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验