Comparative Performance of ChatGPT and Bard in a Text-Based Radiology Knowledge Assessment.

PURPOSE

Bard by Google, a direct competitor to ChatGPT, was recently released. Understanding the relative performance of these different chatbots can provide important insight into their strengths and weaknesses as well as which roles they are most suited to fill. In this project, we aimed to compare the most recent version of ChatGPT, ChatGPT-4, and Bard by Google, in their ability to accurately respond to radiology board examination practice questions.

METHODS

Text-based questions were collected from the 2017-2021 American College of Radiology's Diagnostic Radiology In-Training (DXIT) examinations. ChatGPT-4 and Bard were queried, and their comparative accuracies, response lengths, and response times were documented. Subspecialty-specific performance was analyzed as well.

RESULTS

318 questions were included in our analysis. ChatGPT answered significantly more accurately than Bard (87.11% vs 70.44%, < .0001). ChatGPT's response length was significantly shorter than Bard's (935.28 ± 440.88 characters vs 1437.52 ± 415.91 characters, < .0001). ChatGPT's response time was significantly longer than Bard's (26.79 ± 3.27 seconds vs 7.55 ± 1.88 seconds, < .0001). ChatGPT performed superiorly to Bard in neuroradiology, (100.00% vs 86.21%, = .03), general & physics (85.39% vs 68.54%, < .001), nuclear medicine (80.00% vs 56.67%, < .01), pediatric radiology (93.75% vs 68.75%, = .03), and ultrasound (100.00% vs 63.64%, < .001). In the remaining subspecialties, there were no significant differences between ChatGPT and Bard's performance.

CONCLUSION

ChatGPT displayed superior radiology knowledge compared to Bard. While both chatbots display reasonable radiology knowledge, they should be used with conscious knowledge of their limitations and fallibility. Both chatbots provided incorrect or illogical answer explanations and did not always address the educational content of the question.