• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Evaluating the Reliability of OpenAI's ChatGPT-4 in Providing Pre-colonoscopy Patient Guidance.评估OpenAI的ChatGPT-4在提供结肠镜检查前患者指导方面的可靠性。
Cureus. 2025 Jun 21;17(6):e86512. doi: 10.7759/cureus.86512. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
Artificial Intelligence in Peripheral Artery Disease Education: A Battle Between ChatGPT and Google Gemini.外周动脉疾病教育中的人工智能:ChatGPT与谷歌Gemini的较量
Cureus. 2025 Jun 1;17(6):e85174. doi: 10.7759/cureus.85174. eCollection 2025 Jun.
3
Stench of Errors or the Shine of Potential: The Challenge of (Ir)Responsible Use of ChatGPT in Speech-Language Pathology.错误的恶臭还是潜力的光辉:言语病理学中(不)负责任地使用ChatGPT的挑战。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2025 Jul-Aug;60(4):e70088. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.70088.
4
"Dr. AI Will See You Now": How Do ChatGPT-4 Treatment Recommendations Align With Orthopaedic Clinical Practice Guidelines?“AI 医生为您服务”:ChatGPT-4 的治疗建议与骨科临床实践指南如何契合?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Dec 1;482(12):2098-2106. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003234. Epub 2024 Sep 6.
5
Using Artificial Intelligence ChatGPT to Access Medical Information about Chemical Eye Injuries: A Comparative Study.使用人工智能ChatGPT获取有关化学性眼外伤的医学信息:一项比较研究。
JMIR Form Res. 2025 Jun 30. doi: 10.2196/73642.
6
Evaluating ChatGPT and DeepSeek in postdural puncture headache management: a comparative study with international consensus guidelines.评估ChatGPT和DeepSeek在硬膜穿刺后头痛管理中的应用:与国际共识指南的对比研究
BMC Neurol. 2025 Jul 1;25(1):264. doi: 10.1186/s12883-025-04280-8.
7
Performance of 3 Conversational Generative Artificial Intelligence Models for Computing Maximum Safe Doses of Local Anesthetics: Comparative Analysis.用于计算局部麻醉药最大安全剂量的3种对话式生成人工智能模型的性能:比较分析
JMIR AI. 2025 May 13;4:e66796. doi: 10.2196/66796.
8
Comparative evaluation of ChatGPT and LLaMA for reliability, quality, and accuracy in familial Mediterranean fever.ChatGPT与LLaMA在家族性地中海热的可靠性、质量和准确性方面的比较评估
Eur J Pediatr. 2025 Jul 18;184(8):491. doi: 10.1007/s00431-025-06318-y.
9
How accurate are ChatGPT-4 responses in chronic urticaria? A critical analysis with information quality metrics.ChatGPT-4对慢性荨麻疹的回答有多准确?基于信息质量指标的批判性分析。
World Allergy Organ J. 2025 Jun 14;18(7):101071. doi: 10.1016/j.waojou.2025.101071. eCollection 2025 Jul.
10
Evaluating ChatGPT o1's Capabilities in Peripheral Nerve Surgery: Advancing Artificial Intelligence in Clinical Practice.评估ChatGPT-1在外周神经外科手术中的能力:推动人工智能在临床实践中的应用。
World Neurosurg. 2025 Apr;196:123753. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2025.123753. Epub 2025 Mar 6.

本文引用的文献

1
Assessing ChatGPT4 with and without retrieval-augmented generation in anticoagulation management for gastrointestinal procedures.在胃肠道手术的抗凝管理中评估有无检索增强生成功能的ChatGPT4。
Ann Gastroenterol. 2024 Sep-Oct;37(5):514-526. doi: 10.20524/aog.2024.0907. Epub 2024 Aug 19.
2
Transformative Potential of AI in Healthcare: Definitions, Applications, and Navigating the Ethical Landscape and Public Perspectives.人工智能在医疗保健领域的变革潜力:定义、应用以及应对伦理格局和公众观点
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Jan 5;12(2):125. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12020125.
3
Evaluating the role of ChatGPT in gastroenterology: a comprehensive systematic review of applications, benefits, and limitations.评估ChatGPT在胃肠病学中的作用:对其应用、益处及局限性的全面系统综述
Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2023 Dec 25;16:17562848231218618. doi: 10.1177/17562848231218618. eCollection 2023.
4
Evolving Landscape of Large Language Models: An Evaluation of ChatGPT and Bard in Answering Patient Queries on Colonoscopy.大语言模型的发展态势:对ChatGPT和Bard回答结肠镜检查患者问题的评估
Gastroenterology. 2024 Jan;166(1):220-221. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2023.08.033. Epub 2023 Aug 26.
5
Comparative Performance of ChatGPT and Bard in a Text-Based Radiology Knowledge Assessment.ChatGPT 和 Bard 在基于文本的放射学知识评估中的比较性能。
Can Assoc Radiol J. 2024 May;75(2):344-350. doi: 10.1177/08465371231193716. Epub 2023 Aug 14.
6
Evaluating the Effectiveness of Artificial Intelligence-powered Large Language Models Application in Disseminating Appropriate and Readable Health Information in Urology.评估人工智能驱动的大型语言模型在泌尿外科传播恰当且易读的健康信息方面的有效性。
J Urol. 2023 Oct;210(4):688-694. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000003615. Epub 2023 Jul 10.
7
Challenges of Anticoagulant Therapy in Atrial Fibrillation-Focus on Gastrointestinal Bleeding.房颤抗凝治疗面临的挑战-关注胃肠道出血。
Int J Mol Sci. 2023 Apr 7;24(8):6879. doi: 10.3390/ijms24086879.
8
Aesthetic Surgery Advice and Counseling from Artificial Intelligence: A Rhinoplasty Consultation with ChatGPT.人工智能提供的美容外科建议和咨询:ChatGPT 参与的隆鼻咨询。
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2023 Oct;47(5):1985-1993. doi: 10.1007/s00266-023-03338-7. Epub 2023 Apr 24.
9
Diagnostic medical artificial intelligence: Futuristic prospects for implementation in healthcare settings.诊断医学人工智能:在医疗环境中实施的未来前景。
Front Artif Intell. 2023 Mar 30;6:1169244. doi: 10.3389/frai.2023.1169244. eCollection 2023.
10
Assessing the performance of ChatGPT in answering questions regarding cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma.评估 ChatGPT 在回答肝硬化和肝细胞癌相关问题方面的表现。
Clin Mol Hepatol. 2023 Jul;29(3):721-732. doi: 10.3350/cmh.2023.0089. Epub 2023 Mar 22.

评估OpenAI的ChatGPT-4在提供结肠镜检查前患者指导方面的可靠性。

Evaluating the Reliability of OpenAI's ChatGPT-4 in Providing Pre-colonoscopy Patient Guidance.

作者信息

Patel Akash, Ajumobi Adewale

机构信息

Internal Medicine, Eisenhower Health, Rancho Mirage, USA.

Internal Medicine, Riverside Community Hospital, Riverside, USA.

出版信息

Cureus. 2025 Jun 21;17(6):e86512. doi: 10.7759/cureus.86512. eCollection 2025 Jun.

DOI:10.7759/cureus.86512
PMID:40698206
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12280836/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) in healthcare is a growing area of interest. This study aims to evaluate the reliability of OpenAI's ChatGPT-4.0 in providing pre-colonoscopy patient guidance, a critical aspect of gastrointestinal care where patient misconceptions and non-compliance are common challenges.

METHODS

The study employed a qualitative design to assess ChatGPT-4.0 against established clinical guidelines from various medical societies. Twenty-five patient-like queries encompassing dietary recommendations, bowel preparation, cardiovascular medications, antibiotic prophylaxis, and diabetes medications management were presented to ChatGPT-4.0. The AI's responses were independently evaluated and classified in terms of their alignment with the guidelines.

RESULTS

ChatGPT-4 demonstrated high accuracy, with all 25 sample queries' responses aligning with the established clinical guidelines. It provided precise guidance on dietary restrictions, medication management, and bowel preparation in accordance with the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE), the U.S. Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer (USMSTF), the American College of Gastroenterology-Canadian Association of Gastroenterology (ACG-CAG), the American College of Cardiology-American Heart Association (ACC-AHA), the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE), and the Australian Diabetes Society (ADS).

CONCLUSION

The high degree of guideline adherence by ChatGPT-4.0 underscores its viability as a dependable resource for patient education. Despite its promising results, the study acknowledges limitations such as the structured nature of patient queries and the lack of real patient interactions. The findings suggest a potential role for AI in augmenting patient education and standardizing information dissemination in healthcare.

摘要

背景

人工智能(AI)在医疗保健领域的整合是一个日益受到关注的领域。本研究旨在评估OpenAI的ChatGPT-4.0在提供结肠镜检查前患者指导方面的可靠性,这是胃肠护理的一个关键方面,患者的误解和不依从是常见的挑战。

方法

本研究采用定性设计,根据各种医学协会既定的临床指南对ChatGPT-4.0进行评估。向ChatGPT-4.0提出了25个类似患者的问题,涵盖饮食建议、肠道准备、心血管药物、抗生素预防和糖尿病药物管理。人工智能的回答根据与指南的一致性进行独立评估和分类。

结果

ChatGPT-4表现出高度的准确性,所有25个样本问题的回答均与既定的临床指南一致。它根据欧洲胃肠内镜学会(ESGE)、美国结直肠癌多学会特别工作组(USMSTF)、美国胃肠病学会 - 加拿大胃肠病学会(ACG-CAG)、美国心脏病学会 - 美国心脏协会(ACC-AHA)、美国胃肠内镜学会(ASGE)和澳大利亚糖尿病协会(ADS)的指南,提供了关于饮食限制、药物管理和肠道准备的精确指导。

结论

ChatGPT-4.0对指南的高度遵守突出了其作为患者教育可靠资源的可行性。尽管取得了令人鼓舞的结果,但该研究承认存在局限性,如患者问题的结构化性质以及缺乏真实的患者互动。研究结果表明人工智能在加强患者教育和规范医疗保健信息传播方面具有潜在作用。