Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York.
Harley Street Clinic, London, UK.
J Reconstr Microsurg. 2024 May;40(4):245-252. doi: 10.1055/a-2153-2467. Epub 2023 Aug 14.
Extensive studies have been conducted using the rat model to understand the potential technical errors that lead to anastomotic failure. However, current literature indicates that the rat model has excellent tolerance to diverse errors committed by microsurgeons. The error-investigating rat model is often created by one or two experienced surgeons, and only one isolated technical error is examined. These biases may potentially cause limitations of the results from previous studies. Meanwhile, venous anastomoses have rarely been investigated in previous literature. Therefore, it is important to elucidate this topic with a more comprehensive study design.
Ninety-four arterial and 94 venous anastomoses on Sprague-Dawley rat femoral vessels that were performed by 47 microsurgeons who participated in the microsurgery course at the Columbia University and the University of Thessaloniki were evaluated. In total, 10 technical errors were examined: (1) disruption of suture line, (2) back-wall stitch, (3) oblique stitch, (4) wide bite, (5) partial thickness bite, (6) unequal suture distance, (7) tear in vessel wall, (8) excessively tight suture, (9) suture threads in lumen, and (10) large edge overlap. The frequency of each error committed, and the 30-minute postoperative patency was also recorded. The underlying causal relationship between these errors, potential interaction, and the short-term anastomosis patency was analyzed statistically.
Only the back-wall stitch was found to have a significant causal effect on arterial anastomosis failure ( < 0.001). Back-wall stitch, wide bite, and partial thickness bite significantly impact venous anastomosis patency ( < 0.001). No other statistically significant result was found.
Overall, the rat model is highly resilient to various technical errors despite these mistakes being often considered clinically unacceptable. Therefore, researchers need to consider the resilience of the rat model when designing and analyzing future studies. In addition, microsurgery instructors should focus on individual stitch quality rather than the final patency.
大量研究已使用大鼠模型进行,旨在了解导致吻合失败的潜在技术误差。然而,目前的文献表明,大鼠模型对显微外科医生犯下的各种错误具有出色的耐受能力。错误调查大鼠模型通常由一到两名经验丰富的外科医生创建,且仅检查一个孤立的技术错误。这些偏差可能会对之前研究的结果产生限制。同时,之前的文献很少研究静脉吻合。因此,用更全面的研究设计来阐明这个课题非常重要。
评估了 47 名参加哥伦比亚大学和塞萨洛尼基大学显微手术课程的显微外科医生在 Sprague-Dawley 大鼠股血管上进行的 94 次动脉吻合和 94 次静脉吻合。总共检查了 10 种技术错误:(1)缝线破裂,(2)后壁缝线,(3)斜缝线,(4)宽咬,(5)部分厚度咬,(6)缝线不等距,(7)血管壁撕裂,(8)缝线过紧,(9)缝线线在管腔中,以及(10)边缘重叠过大。记录每种错误的发生频率和术后 30 分钟的通畅率。还对这些错误之间的潜在因果关系、潜在相互作用以及短期吻合通畅率进行了统计学分析。
仅后壁缝线被发现对动脉吻合失败有显著的因果影响(<0.001)。后壁缝线、宽咬和部分厚度咬对静脉吻合通畅率有显著影响(<0.001)。没有发现其他具有统计学意义的结果。
总体而言,尽管这些错误在临床上通常被认为是不可接受的,但大鼠模型对各种技术错误具有很强的弹性。因此,研究人员在设计和分析未来的研究时需要考虑大鼠模型的弹性。此外,显微外科教师应该关注单个缝线的质量,而不是最终的通畅率。