Kim H Mike, Huff Haley, Smith Matthew J, Nguyen Michael, Smith Conor
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA.
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2024 Jan;33(1):6-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2023.07.014. Epub 2023 Aug 12.
Cutibacterium acnes remains the most commonly detected organism in shoulder arthroplasty. C acnes infection is thought to occur during shoulder arthroplasty through contamination of the surgical field with C acnes from the incised dermis. The purpose of this study was to examine whether using electrocautery for making skin incisions would decrease C acnes culture rates at the incised dermis compared to using scalpels during shoulder arthroplasty.
Patients undergoing primary shoulder arthroplasty were randomized into 2 groups, electrocautery vs. scalpel incision group. All patients received a standard preoperative antiseptic preparation including chlorhexidine gluconate showers, intravenous antibiotic administration, and topical application of hydrogen peroxide, povidone iodine, isopropyl alcohol, and DuraPrep. Cultures were obtained from the incised dermal edge immediately after skin incision and later from surgeon's gloves and forceps immediately prior to humeral component implantation. The primary outcome was positive C acnes culture rates compared between the groups.
A total of 64 patients (32 in each group) were enrolled. There were 24 males in each group. Regarding dermis cultures, 10 patients (31%) in the scalpel group were positive with 8 of them positive for C acnes, whereas no patients in the electrocautery group were positive (P < .001). Regarding glove cultures, the electrocautery group had 8 patients positive C acnes, while the scalpel group had 8 (P = .777). Regarding forceps cultures, the electrocautery group had 4 patients positive for C acnes, and the scalpel group had 6 (P = .491). All positive cultures were exclusively from male patients. There were no wound complications or infection in the electrocautery group while the scalpel group had 1 acute postoperative infection.
Making skin incisions using electrocautery resulted in 0 C acnes culture at the incised dermis, suggesting its potential effect against C acnes. However, despite this initial antibacterial effect, C acnes still appeared on surgeon's gloves and forceps during surgery of male patients. All positive cultures were from male patients, suggesting that the source of C acnes was specifically related to the male body. While the study hypothesis was supported by the results, the present study also raises new questions and calls for further research.
痤疮丙酸杆菌仍是肩关节置换术中最常检测到的微生物。痤疮丙酸杆菌感染被认为是在肩关节置换术期间,手术区域被来自切开真皮的痤疮丙酸杆菌污染所致。本研究的目的是探讨在肩关节置换术中,与使用手术刀相比,使用电灼进行皮肤切口是否会降低切开真皮处的痤疮丙酸杆菌培养率。
接受初次肩关节置换术的患者被随机分为两组,即电灼组与手术刀切口组。所有患者均接受标准的术前抗菌准备,包括洗必泰葡萄糖酸盐沐浴、静脉注射抗生素以及局部应用过氧化氢、聚维酮碘、异丙醇和手术皮肤保护膜。在皮肤切口后立即从切开的真皮边缘获取培养物,随后在肱骨部件植入前立即从外科医生的手套和镊子上获取培养物。主要结局是比较两组之间痤疮丙酸杆菌培养阳性率。
共纳入64例患者(每组32例)。每组有24名男性。关于真皮培养,手术刀组有10例患者(31%)培养阳性,其中8例痤疮丙酸杆菌阳性,而电灼组无患者培养阳性(P <.001)。关于手套培养,电灼组有8例患者痤疮丙酸杆菌阳性;手术刀组有8例(P = 0.777)。关于镊子培养,电灼组有4例患者痤疮丙酸杆菌阳性,手术刀组有6例(P = 0.491)。所有阳性培养物均仅来自男性患者。电灼组无伤口并发症或感染,而手术刀组有1例术后急性感染。
使用电灼进行皮肤切口导致切开真皮处痤疮丙酸杆菌培养为0,表明其对痤疮丙酸杆菌有潜在作用。然而,尽管有这种初始抗菌作用,但在男性患者手术期间,痤疮丙酸杆菌仍出现在外科医生的手套和镊子上。所有阳性培养物均来自男性患者,表明痤疮丙酸杆菌的来源与男性身体有特定关系。虽然研究假设得到了结果的支持,但本研究也提出了新问题,需要进一步研究。