• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在过去 20 年中,对回肠造口和结肠造口标本进行了成本效益分析和病理审查。

Cost benefit analysis and pathology review of ileostomy and colostomy specimens processed over a 20-year period.

机构信息

Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of California Irvine, CA, 92868 USA.

California University of Science and Medicine, Colton, CA, 92324 USA.

出版信息

Hum Pathol. 2023 Nov;141:1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.humpath.2023.08.002. Epub 2023 Aug 12.

DOI:10.1016/j.humpath.2023.08.002
PMID:37579979
Abstract

Rising healthcare costs have been linked to overtreatment and overuse of available resources. Identifying and eliminating low-value services is vital for reducing such costs. At many institutions, including ours, all ileostomy and colostomy specimens are sent for pathological evaluation. It is estimated that approximately 120,000 ileostomy/colostomy procedures are done every year, and at least 1 million patients have stomas at any given time in North America. Hence, we decided to analyze the pathological findings and cost-benefit of undertaking the pathological evaluation of these colostomy and ileostomy specimens. The pathology database of our department was searched for all ileostomy and colostomy specimens received between 2000 and 2020, resulting in a total of 2762 cases (1944 ileostomy and 818 colostomy). We performed a cost-benefit analysis and pathologic review of these cases. The results of our study show that 99.38% of these specimens did not show any significant pathological abnormality, and non-neoplastic pathologic findings accounted for 99.63% of cases. Less than 1% of our cases showed any clinically significant pathological findings. All 10 cases that showed a neoplastic or malignant diagnosis showed some abnormal finding that was appreciated at the time of gross examination. We conclude that microscopic evaluation of ileostomy and colostomy specimens incurs significant costs and provides no clear value or relevant information for patient care. The results of our study provide support for ileostomy and colostomy specimens to be triaged by gross-only pathological examination in the first instance for the vast majority of cases.

摘要

不断上涨的医疗保健成本与过度治疗和过度使用现有资源有关。确定和消除低价值服务对于降低此类成本至关重要。在包括我们医院在内的许多机构中,所有的回肠造口和结肠造口标本都要进行病理评估。据估计,每年大约有 12 万例回肠造口/结肠造口术,在北美任何时候都至少有 100 万名患者有造口。因此,我们决定分析这些结肠造口和回肠造口标本进行病理评估的病理发现和成本效益。我们科室的病理数据库搜索了 2000 年至 2020 年期间收到的所有回肠造口和结肠造口标本,共 2762 例(1944 例回肠造口和 818 例结肠造口)。我们对这些病例进行了成本效益分析和病理复查。研究结果表明,这些标本中 99.38%没有显示任何明显的病理异常,非肿瘤性病理发现占病例的 99.63%。不到 1%的病例显示出任何有临床意义的病理发现。所有 10 例显示肿瘤或恶性诊断的病例都显示出一些在大体检查时就已被注意到的异常发现。我们得出结论,回肠造口和结肠造口标本的显微镜评估会产生显著的成本,但对患者护理没有提供明确的价值或相关信息。我们的研究结果支持对绝大多数病例的回肠造口和结肠造口标本进行仅通过大体检查进行初步分类。

相似文献

1
Cost benefit analysis and pathology review of ileostomy and colostomy specimens processed over a 20-year period.在过去 20 年中,对回肠造口和结肠造口标本进行了成本效益分析和病理审查。
Hum Pathol. 2023 Nov;141:1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.humpath.2023.08.002. Epub 2023 Aug 12.
2
[Comparison of colostomies and ileostomies as diverting stomas after low anterior resection].[低位前切除术后结肠造口术与回肠造口术作为转流性造口的比较]
Cir Esp. 2007 Mar;81(3):115-20. doi: 10.1016/s0009-739x(07)71280-0.
3
Loop transverse colostomy versus loop ileostomy for defunctioning of colorectal anastomosis: a systematic review, updated conventional meta-analysis, and cumulative meta-analysis.用于结直肠吻合口减功能的袢式横结肠造口术与袢式回肠造口术:一项系统评价、更新的传统荟萃分析和累积荟萃分析
Surg Today. 2019 Feb;49(2):108-117. doi: 10.1007/s00595-018-1708-x. Epub 2018 Aug 27.
4
Comparison of safety of loop ileostomy and loop transverse colostomy for low-lying rectal cancer patients undergoing anterior resection: A retrospective, single institute, propensity score-matched study.低位直肠癌患者前切除术回肠袢式造口术与横结肠袢式造口术安全性的比较:一项回顾性、单机构、倾向评分匹配研究。
J BUON. 2019 Jan-Feb;24(1):123-129.
5
Does stoma modify compliance with enhanced recovery after surgery programs? Results of a cohort study.造口是否会影响术后加速康复计划的依从性?一项队列研究的结果。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2023 Apr 17;38(1):100. doi: 10.1007/s00384-023-04396-8.
6
End colostomy and Brooke's ileostomy constructed by surgical stapler.
Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1986 Jan;162(1):62-4.
7
Diversion stoma after colorectal surgery: loop colostomy or ileostomy?结直肠手术后的转流造口术:袢式结肠造口术还是回肠造口术?
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2011 Apr;26(4):431-6. doi: 10.1007/s00384-010-1123-2. Epub 2011 Jan 11.
8
Transverse colostomy or loop ileostomy as diverting stoma in colorectal surgery.横结肠造口术或袢式回肠造口术作为结直肠手术中的转流性造口。
Acta Chir Scand. 1987 Mar;153(3):229-32.
9
Cross-cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Stoma Quality of Life Questionnaire for Patients With a Colostomy or Ileostomy in Brazil: A Cross-sectional Study.巴西结肠造口术或回肠造口术患者造口生活质量问卷的跨文化适应与验证:一项横断面研究
Ostomy Wound Manage. 2017 May;63(5):34-41.
10
Ileostomy versus colostomy: impact on functional outcomes after total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer.回肠造口术与结肠造口术:直肠全系膜切除术后对直肠癌功能结局的影响。
Colorectal Dis. 2023 Aug;25(8):1686-1693. doi: 10.1111/codi.16657. Epub 2023 Jul 17.

引用本文的文献

1
The Differences in Postoperative Nursing Between Temporary Ileostomy and Temporary Colostomy: A Retrospective Cohort Study.临时回肠造口术与临时结肠造口术术后护理的差异:一项回顾性队列研究
Nurs Open. 2025 Mar;12(3):e70189. doi: 10.1002/nop2.70189.