Suppr超能文献

替卡格雷与阿司匹林联合治疗轻型缺血性卒中和短暂性脑缺血发作患者的网络荟萃分析。

Ticagrelor plus aspirin in patients with minor ischemic stroke and transient ischemic attack: a network meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Neurology, Xi'an International Medical Center Hospital, Xitai Road, Gaoxin District, Xi'an City, 710010, Shaanxi Province, China.

出版信息

BMC Neurol. 2023 Aug 14;23(1):303. doi: 10.1186/s12883-023-03356-7.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with aspirin and clopidogrel was recommended as the secondary prevention of minor ischemic stroke or transient ischaemic attack (TIA). However, genetic polymorphisms of CYP2C19 had been identified as the major cause of poor responsiveness to clopidogrel. Ticagrelor, unlike clopidogrel, did not depend on metabolic activation, but it remained unclear whether ticagrelor was superior to clopidogrel in ischemic stroke. We performed a network meta-analysis to compare the efficacy and safety of ticagrelor, clopidogrel, and aspirin in the minor ischemic stroke and TIA populations.

METHODS

Databases of Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.gov, and PubMed were searched up to June 19, 2023. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing antiplatelet drugs for minor stroke or TIA were included. Statistical processing was conducted by using multivariate meta-analysis routines of STATA.

RESULTS

Seven RCTs were included involving 41,745 participants. There was no significant difference between the two DAPTs in preventing stroke recurrence (OR, 1.16; 95% CI, 0.93-1.44), ischemic stroke recurrence (OR, 1.16; 95% CI, 0.93-1.45), and major hemorrhage (OR, 1.22; 95% CI, 0.62,2.39). Compared with aspirin alone, the two DAPT regimen reduced the risk of stroke recurrence (clopidogrel: OR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.60-0.80, ticagrelor: OR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.49-0.87) and ischemic stroke recurrence, but increased the incidence of major hemorrhage (clopidogrel: OR, 2.05; 95% CI, 1.22- 3.77; ticagrelor: OR, 2.55; 95% CI, 1.25-4.99). Despite being associated with a higher risk of any bleeding, ticagrelor did not impact the composite of vascular events or mortality. While ticagrelor and aspirin reduced the risk of ischemic stroke recurrence (OR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.63- 0.92) without increasing the risk of major bleeding (OR 0.94; 95% CI 0.45-1.95) in the Asian population mainly Chinese.

CONCLUSIONS

DAPT was superior to aspirin in stroke prevention, but little difference existed between the two DAPT regimens. Asian population mainly Chinese may benefit from DAPT with aspirin and ticagrelor. But further head-to-head RCTs are needed to validate the study results.

摘要

背景

阿司匹林和氯吡格雷双联抗血小板治疗(DAPT)被推荐用于预防小型缺血性卒中和短暂性脑缺血发作(TIA)的二次发作。然而,细胞色素 P450 2C19(CYP2C19)的遗传多态性已被确定为氯吡格雷反应不良的主要原因。替格瑞洛与氯吡格雷不同,它不依赖于代谢激活,但尚不清楚替格瑞洛在缺血性卒中有否优于氯吡格雷。我们进行了一项网状荟萃分析,以比较替格瑞洛、氯吡格雷和阿司匹林在小型缺血性卒中和 TIA 人群中的疗效和安全性。

方法

检索 Cochrane 图书馆、ClinicalTrials.gov 和 PubMed 数据库,截至 2023 年 6 月 19 日。纳入评估抗血小板药物治疗小型卒中和 TIA 的随机对照试验(RCT)。使用 STATA 的多变量荟萃分析程序进行统计处理。

结果

纳入了 7 项 RCT,涉及 41745 名参与者。两种 DAPT 在预防卒中复发(OR,1.16;95%CI,0.93-1.44)、缺血性卒中复发(OR,1.16;95%CI,0.93-1.45)和主要出血(OR,1.22;95%CI,0.62-2.39)方面无显著差异。与单独使用阿司匹林相比,两种 DAPT 方案降低了卒中复发风险(氯吡格雷:OR,0.69;95%CI,0.60-0.80;替格瑞洛:OR,0.66;95%CI,0.49-0.87)和缺血性卒中复发风险,但增加了大出血的发生率(氯吡格雷:OR,2.05;95%CI,1.22-3.77;替格瑞洛:OR,2.55;95%CI,1.25-4.99)。尽管替格瑞洛与任何出血风险增加相关,但不影响血管事件或死亡率的复合终点。替格瑞洛和阿司匹林降低了亚洲人群(主要为中国人)的缺血性卒中复发风险(OR,0.77;95%CI,0.63-0.92),而不增加大出血风险(OR,0.94;95%CI,0.45-1.95)。

结论

DAPT 在预防卒中方面优于阿司匹林,但两种 DAPT 方案之间差异不大。亚洲人群(主要为中国人)可能从阿司匹林和替格瑞洛双联抗血小板治疗中获益。但需要进一步的头对头 RCT 来验证研究结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f064/10424353/6662502caaa3/12883_2023_3356_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验