Division of Health Policy and Management, University of Minnesota, School of Public Health.
Department of Finance, Carlson School of Management, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.
Med Care. 2023 Oct 1;61(10):636-643. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001906. Epub 2023 Aug 10.
Recent literature has found rapid uptake of short-acting filgrastim biosimilars but slower uptake of other biosimilars, such as infliximab, in both Medicare and privately insured enrollees.
To describe patient, provider, and health plan characteristics associated with a switch to biosimilar among existing infliximab patients.
We constructed a retrospective panel dataset of patients undergoing active infliximab treatments and the choice of infliximab drug for each infusion. We used mixed logit regression controlling for patient, provider, and health plan characteristics as well as time-fixed effects.
Medicare Advantage and privately insured enrollees with evidence of active infliximab treatments between 2016 and 2020 (n=357,430).
Our primary outcome of interest was to switch from infliximab originator to one of the infliximab biosimilars. Exposure variables of interest variables such as out-of-pocket, site of care, and in-network deductible.
Our study found nominally low switching among existing infliximab originator users (3.4%). We found that patients who previously received 1 infliximab originator infusion were 63.7% more likely to switch to biosimilar compared with patients who previously received administration of 20 infliximab originators. We found that biosimilar's placement as health's plan preferred drug was attributed to higher likelihood of biosimilar use (odds ratio: 1.666; P -value=0.001). We did not observe any statistically significant effect among out-of-pocket amount or deductible with respect to switch to infliximab biosimilar.
To encourage uptake and switch to biosimilar, policymakers should consider targeted policies that include leveraging health plan tools such as placement of biosimilar as preferred drug and aim to educate patients on the clinical equivalence between infliximab biosimilar and originator.
最近的文献发现,在医疗保险和私人保险参保者中,短效非格司亭生物类似药的采用速度很快,但其他生物类似药(如英夫利昔单抗)的采用速度较慢。
描述与现有英夫利昔单抗患者转向生物类似药相关的患者、提供者和健康计划特征。
我们构建了一个回顾性的患者队列数据集,这些患者正在接受英夫利昔单抗的治疗,并记录了每次输注的英夫利昔单抗药物选择。我们使用混合逻辑回归来控制患者、提供者和健康计划特征以及时间固定效应。
2016 年至 2020 年间有英夫利昔单抗治疗证据的医疗保险优势计划和私人保险参保者(n=357430)。
我们感兴趣的主要结果是从英夫利昔单抗原研药转向英夫利昔单抗生物类似药之一。感兴趣的暴露变量包括自付额、治疗地点和网络内免赔额。
我们的研究发现,现有英夫利昔单抗原研药使用者的转换率较低(3.4%)。我们发现,与之前接受过 20 次英夫利昔单抗原研药治疗的患者相比,之前接受过 1 次英夫利昔单抗原研药治疗的患者更有可能转向生物类似药。我们发现,生物类似药被列为健康计划的首选药物会增加生物类似药的使用可能性(优势比:1.666;P 值=0.001)。我们没有观察到自付额或免赔额与转向英夫利昔单抗生物类似药之间存在任何统计学上显著的关系。
为了鼓励采用和转向生物类似药,政策制定者应考虑采取有针对性的政策,包括利用健康计划工具,如将生物类似药列为首选药物,并努力教育患者关于英夫利昔单抗生物类似药和原研药之间的临床等效性。