• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

深板层角膜移植与穿透性角膜移植治疗圆锥角膜的长期内皮细胞活力比较。

Long-Term Endothelial Cell Viability After Deep Anterior Lamellar Versus Penetrating Keratoplasty for Keratoconus.

机构信息

From the Department of Ophthalmology, University of Health Sciences, Izmir Bozyaka Education and Research Hospital, Izmir, Turkey.

出版信息

Exp Clin Transplant. 2023 Jul;21(7):599-606. doi: 10.6002/ect.2023.0069.

DOI:10.6002/ect.2023.0069
PMID:37584541
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

We compared long-term endothelial cell survival after penetrating versus after deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty for keratoconus.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively compared 64 eyes of 55 patients who had penetrating keratoplasty and 40 eyes of 37 patients who had deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty for keratoconus (October 2003-February 2021). Best-corrected visual acuity, Goldmann applanation tonometry, fundus examination with 90D lens, and specular microscopy with CEM-530 (Nidek) were performed preoperatively and every 6 months postoperatively. Main outcomes were endothelial cell density, central corneal thickness, and visual acuity. Secondary outcomes were coefficient of variation, hexagonality, graft rejection episodes, and graft clarity.

RESULTS

We found no significant differences between the 2 treatment groups regarding patient age, donor age, preoperative vision, central corneal thickness, and recipient-donor trephine diameters. Mean follow-up was 92.5 months. In deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty, the endothelium was preserved significantly better for 10 years versus for penetrating keratoplasty. Mean endothelial density in penetrating versus deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty was 2006.7 versus 2354.7 cells/mm2 at 1 year (P = .010), 1170.5 versus 2048.2 at 5 years (P <.001), and 972.5 versus 1831.6 at 10 years (P < .001). Cumulative endothelial cell loss was 43% and 19.7% at 10 years for penetrating and anterior lamellar keratoplasty, respectively. Significantly more thickening of central cornea was shown in penetrating keratoplasty after 7 years. Corneal thickness was 583.0 µm in penetrating and 545.1 µm in deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (P = .002) at 10 years. Vision gain and coefficient of variation were similar. Hexagonality decreased significantly in both groups at 10 years. Rates of rejection were 12.5% in penetrating and 7.5% in deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty. Graft survival rates were 97.5% and 96.9%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

In keratoconus, endothelial vitality is better preserved with deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty than with penetrating keratoplasty over a 10-year follow-up.

摘要

目的

我们比较了穿透性角膜移植术与深层前板层角膜移植术治疗圆锥角膜后内皮细胞的长期存活率。

材料与方法

我们回顾性比较了 2003 年 10 月至 2021 年 2 月期间 55 例 64 眼穿透性角膜移植术和 37 例 40 眼深层前板层角膜移植术治疗圆锥角膜的患者。术前和术后每 6 个月进行最佳矫正视力、压平眼压计、90D 晶状体眼底检查和 CEM-530(尼德克)共焦显微镜检查。主要结局是内皮细胞密度、中央角膜厚度和视力。次要结局是变异系数、六边性、移植物排斥反应和移植物清晰度。

结果

两组患者的年龄、供体年龄、术前视力、中央角膜厚度和受者-供体环钻直径无显著差异。平均随访时间为 92.5 个月。在深层前板层角膜移植术中,内皮细胞保存明显优于穿透性角膜移植术,10 年内的结果更好。穿透性角膜移植术与深层前板层角膜移植术的平均内皮密度分别为 2006.7 个/mm2 与 2354.7 个/mm2(P =.010)、1170.5 个/mm2 与 2048.2 个/mm2(P <.001)、972.5 个/mm2 与 1831.6 个/mm2(P <.001)。10 年后穿透性角膜移植术和前板层角膜移植术的内皮细胞丧失率分别为 43%和 19.7%。7 年后穿透性角膜移植术的中央角膜厚度明显增厚。10 年后穿透性角膜移植术的角膜厚度为 583.0 µm,深层前板层角膜移植术为 545.1 µm(P =.002)。视力提高和变异系数相似。两组的六边形度在 10 年内均显著下降。穿透性角膜移植术的排斥率为 12.5%,深层前板层角膜移植术为 7.5%。移植物存活率分别为 97.5%和 96.9%。

结论

在圆锥角膜中,深层前板层角膜移植术比穿透性角膜移植术在 10 年的随访中更好地保持内皮细胞活力。

相似文献

1
Long-Term Endothelial Cell Viability After Deep Anterior Lamellar Versus Penetrating Keratoplasty for Keratoconus.深板层角膜移植与穿透性角膜移植治疗圆锥角膜的长期内皮细胞活力比较。
Exp Clin Transplant. 2023 Jul;21(7):599-606. doi: 10.6002/ect.2023.0069.
2
Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical Outcomes of Penetrating Keratoplasty Versus Deep Anterior Lamellar Keratoplasty for Keratoconus.穿透性角膜移植术与深层前弹力层角膜切除术治疗圆锥角膜的临床疗效的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Exp Clin Transplant. 2020 Aug;18(4):417-428. doi: 10.6002/ect.2019.0123. Epub 2019 Nov 13.
3
Deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty versus penetrating keratoplasty for treating keratoconus.深板层角膜移植术与穿透性角膜移植术治疗圆锥角膜的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jul 22;2014(7):CD009700. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009700.pub2.
4
Deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty versus penetrating keratoplasty in corneas showing a high or low graft rejection risk.在显示高或低移植排斥风险的角膜中,深板层角膜移植术与穿透性角膜移植术的比较
Eur J Ophthalmol. 2019 May;29(3):295-303. doi: 10.1177/1120672118797287. Epub 2018 Sep 3.
5
Refractive outcomes of penetrating keratoplasty and deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty in fellow eyes for keratoconus.圆锥角膜患者健眼中穿透性角膜移植术和深板层角膜移植术的屈光结果
Int Ophthalmol. 2017 Aug;37(4):911-919. doi: 10.1007/s10792-016-0350-0. Epub 2016 Sep 15.
6
Femtosecond laser-assisted deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty: A safer option in keratoconus surgery.飞秒激光辅助深层前板层角膜移植术:圆锥角膜手术中的更安全选择。
Eur J Ophthalmol. 2022 Jan;32(1):59-65. doi: 10.1177/11206721211059023. Epub 2021 Nov 13.
7
Comparison of 12-month anatomic and functional results between Z6 femtosecond laser-assisted and manual trephination in deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty for advanced keratoconus.在晚期圆锥角膜的深前板层角膜移植术中,Z6飞秒激光辅助与手动环切术12个月的解剖和功能结果比较。
J Fr Ophtalmol. 2017 Jun;40(6):e193-e200. doi: 10.1016/j.jfo.2017.05.002. Epub 2017 Jun 7.
8
Comparison of keratoplasty outcomes at the scar versus edema stages of keratoconus.比较圆锥角膜瘢痕期与水肿期角膜移植手术的结果。
Arq Bras Oftalmol. 2024 Apr 19;87(4):e2023. doi: 10.5935/0004-2749.2023-0144. eCollection 2024.
9
[Deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty in the surgical treatment of keratoconus. A 1-year follow-up].[深板层角膜移植术治疗圆锥角膜的手术疗效。1年随访]
J Fr Ophtalmol. 2006 Jun;29(6):602-13. doi: 10.1016/s0181-5512(06)73820-7.
10
Comparison of deep lamellar keratoplasty and penetrating keratoplasty in patients with keratoconus.圆锥角膜患者深层板层角膜移植术与穿透性角膜移植术的比较
Ophthalmology. 2004 Sep;111(9):1676-82. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2004.02.010.

引用本文的文献

1
Keratoconus.圆锥角膜。
Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2024 Oct 24;10(1):81. doi: 10.1038/s41572-024-00565-3.