• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
The impact of a patient decision aid on treatment choices after anterior cruciate ligament injuries.患者决策辅助工具对前交叉韧带损伤后治疗选择的影响。
J Exp Orthop. 2023 Aug 16;10(1):82. doi: 10.1186/s40634-023-00633-9.
2
Early Operative Versus Delayed or Nonoperative Treatment of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries in Pediatric Patients.小儿前交叉韧带损伤的早期手术治疗与延迟或非手术治疗对比
J Athl Train. 2016 May;51(5):425-7. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050.51.5.11. Epub 2016 May 31.
3
Anterior cruciate ligament injuries in adolescents with open physis: effect of recurrent injury and surgical delay on meniscal and cartilage injuries.青少年骺板未闭前十字韧带损伤:反复损伤和手术延迟对半月板和软骨损伤的影响。
Am J Sports Med. 2014 May;42(5):1068-73. doi: 10.1177/0363546514525584. Epub 2014 Mar 14.
4
Report of the Clinical and Functional Primary Outcomes in Men of the ACL-SPORTS Trial: Similar Outcomes in Men Receiving Secondary Prevention With and Without Perturbation Training 1 and 2 Years After ACL Reconstruction.前交叉韧带运动损伤(ACL-SPORTS)试验男性患者临床及功能主要结局报告:ACL重建术后1年和2年接受或未接受扰动训练1和2进行二级预防的男性患者结局相似。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Oct;475(10):2523-2534. doi: 10.1007/s11999-017-5280-2.
5
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury-Who Succeeds Without Reconstructive Surgery? The Delaware-Oslo ACL Cohort Study.前交叉韧带损伤——哪些人未经重建手术而康复?特拉华-奥斯陆前交叉韧带队列研究。
Orthop J Sports Med. 2018 May 23;6(5):2325967118774255. doi: 10.1177/2325967118774255. eCollection 2018 May.
6
Surgical versus conservative interventions for treating anterior cruciate ligament injuries.治疗前交叉韧带损伤的手术与保守干预措施
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Apr 3;4(4):CD011166. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011166.pub2.
7
Evidence too weak to guide surgical treatment decisions for anterior cruciate ligament injury: a systematic review of the risk of new meniscal tears after anterior cruciate ligament injury.证据太弱,无法指导前交叉韧带损伤的手术治疗决策:前交叉韧带损伤后半月板新撕裂风险的系统评价。
Br J Sports Med. 2020 May;54(9):520-527. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2019-100956. Epub 2020 Jan 20.
8
Development and Test of a Decision Aid for Shared Decision Making in Patients with Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury.前交叉韧带损伤患者共同决策辅助工具的开发与测试
MDM Policy Pract. 2022 Mar 4;7(1):23814683221081434. doi: 10.1177/23814683221081434. eCollection 2022 Jan-Jun.
9
Secondary Meniscal Tears in Patients With Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury: Relationship Among Operative Management, Osteoarthritis, and Arthroplasty at 18-Year Mean Follow-up.前交叉韧带损伤患者的半月板二次撕裂:18 年平均随访时手术治疗、骨关节炎和关节置换的关系。
Am J Sports Med. 2019 Jun;47(7):1583-1590. doi: 10.1177/0363546519844481.
10
High Rate of Initially Overlooked Kaplan Fiber Complex Injuries in Patients With Isolated Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury.孤立性前交叉韧带损伤患者中,Kaplan 纤维复合体损伤初诊漏诊率较高。
Am J Sports Med. 2021 Jul;49(8):2117-2124. doi: 10.1177/03635465211015682. Epub 2021 Jun 4.

本文引用的文献

1
Treatment decision-making process after an anterior cruciate ligament injury: patients', orthopaedic surgeons' and physiotherapists' perspectives.前交叉韧带损伤后的治疗决策过程:患者、骨科医生和物理治疗师的观点。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022 Aug 16;23(1):782. doi: 10.1186/s12891-022-05745-4.
2
Development and Test of a Decision Aid for Shared Decision Making in Patients with Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury.前交叉韧带损伤患者共同决策辅助工具的开发与测试
MDM Policy Pract. 2022 Mar 4;7(1):23814683221081434. doi: 10.1177/23814683221081434. eCollection 2022 Jan-Jun.
3
Shared Decision Making in Surgery: A Meta-Analysis of Existing Literature.手术中的共享决策制定:现有文献的荟萃分析。
Patient. 2020 Dec;13(6):667-681. doi: 10.1007/s40271-020-00443-6.
4
Decision Aid Implementation and Patients' Preferences for Hip and Knee Osteoarthritis Treatment: Insights from the High Value Healthcare Collaborative.决策辅助工具的实施与患者对髋膝关节骨关节炎治疗的偏好:来自高价值医疗协作组织的见解
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2020 Jan 6;14:23-32. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S227207. eCollection 2020.
5
Do Decision Aids Benefit Patients with Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain? A Systematic Review.决策辅助工具是否有益于慢性肌肉骨骼疼痛患者?系统评价。
Pain Med. 2020 May 1;21(5):951-969. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnz280.
6
Implementation of patient involvement methods in the clinical setting: A qualitative study exploring the health professional perspective.在临床环境中实施患者参与方法:一项探索卫生专业人员视角的定性研究。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2020 Jun;26(3):765-776. doi: 10.1111/jep.13217. Epub 2019 Jul 2.
7
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tear.前交叉韧带撕裂
N Engl J Med. 2019 Jun 13;380(24):2341-2348. doi: 10.1056/NEJMcp1805931.
8
Evaluation of a Patient Decision Aid for Unicompartmental or Total Knee Arthroplasty for Medial Knee Osteoarthritis.评价一种用于治疗内侧膝关节骨关节炎的单髁或全膝关节置换术的患者决策辅助工具。
J Arthroplasty. 2017 Nov;32(11):3340-3344. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.06.014. Epub 2017 Jun 17.
9
Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions.为面临医疗治疗或筛查决策的人们提供的决策辅助工具。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Apr 12;4(4):CD001431. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001431.pub5.
10
Shared Decision Making and Choice for Elective Surgical Care: A Systematic Review.选择性外科护理的共同决策与选择:一项系统综述
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2016 Mar;154(3):405-20. doi: 10.1177/0194599815620558. Epub 2015 Dec 8.

患者决策辅助工具对前交叉韧带损伤后治疗选择的影响。

The impact of a patient decision aid on treatment choices after anterior cruciate ligament injuries.

作者信息

Mainz Hanne, Frandsen Lone, Fauno Peter, Lomborg Kirsten, Lind Martin

机构信息

Clinic of Sports Traumatology, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.

Research Centre of Patient Involvement, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.

出版信息

J Exp Orthop. 2023 Aug 16;10(1):82. doi: 10.1186/s40634-023-00633-9.

DOI:10.1186/s40634-023-00633-9
PMID:37584784
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10429475/
Abstract

PURPOSE

The present study aimed to investigate whether exposure to a patient decision aid (PDA) had an impact on the proportion of patients selecting non-surgical or surgical treatments after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries and whether exposure to a PDA affected the proportion of patients switching from non-surgical to surgical treatment within the first year.

METHODS

In a consecutive case series, proportions of surgery and non-surgery were compared before and after patients' exposure to a PDA. Data were collected from the health records of patients with ACL injuries who presented to the Clinic of Sports Traumatology. To identify proportional differences between the two groups, t-tests and proportion tests were used.

RESULTS

In total, 1,053 patients with ACL injuries were included: 563 patients with no exposure to the PDA (January 2015 to January 2017) and 490 patients with exposure to the PDA (January 2017 to January 2019). Before implementing the PDA, 27% of the patients selected non-surgical treatment. After implementing the PDA, 30% choose non-surgical treatment (p > 0.05). Before implementing the PDA, 21% of patients who initially chose non-surgical treatment had surgery within the first year. After implementation of the PDA, this number fell to 16%, but the difference was not statistically significant (p > 0,05).

CONCLUSION

Exposure to the PDA did not significantly alter the proportion of ACL injury patients selecting non-surgical or surgical treatments or the proportion of patients switching to surgery within the first year.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在调查接触患者决策辅助工具(PDA)是否会影响前交叉韧带(ACL)损伤患者选择非手术或手术治疗的比例,以及接触PDA是否会影响患者在第一年内从非手术治疗转为手术治疗的比例。

方法

在一个连续病例系列中,比较患者接触PDA前后手术和非手术的比例。数据收集自就诊于运动创伤诊所的ACL损伤患者的健康记录。为了确定两组之间的比例差异,使用了t检验和比例检验。

结果

总共纳入了1053例ACL损伤患者:563例未接触PDA的患者(2015年1月至2017年1月)和490例接触PDA的患者(2017年1月至2019年1月)。在实施PDA之前,27%的患者选择非手术治疗。实施PDA之后,30%的患者选择非手术治疗(p>0.05)。在实施PDA之前,最初选择非手术治疗的患者中有21%在第一年内进行了手术。实施PDA之后,这一数字降至16%,但差异无统计学意义(p>0.05)。

结论

接触PDA并未显著改变ACL损伤患者选择非手术或手术治疗的比例,也未显著改变患者在第一年内转为手术治疗的比例。