• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

国家高血压控制办公室和家庭测量评估登记处:LHAR 国家登记处。

National Registry of Hypertension Control Evaluated by Office and Home Measurements: The LHAR National Registry.

机构信息

Serviço de Cardiologia, Disciplina de Geriatria e Gerontologia, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP - Brasil.

Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ - Brasil.

出版信息

Arq Bras Cardiol. 2023 Jul;120(8):e20220863. doi: 10.36660/abc.20220863.

DOI:10.36660/abc.20220863
PMID:37586005
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10464860/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

It is known that around 30% of patients have higher blood pressure (BP) values when examined at the office than at home. Worldwide, only 35% of patients with hypertension undergoing treatment have reached their BP targets.

OBJECTIVE

To provide epidemiological data on BP control in the offices of a sample of Brazilian cardiologists, considering office and home BP measurement.

METHODS

This is a cross-sectional analysis of patients with a hypertension diagnosis and undergoing antihypertensive treatment, with controlled BP or not. BP was assayed in the office by a medical professional and at home using home BP monitoring (HBPM). The association between categorical variables was verified using the chi-square test (p<0.05).

RESULTS

The study included 2540 patients, with a mean age of 59.7 ± 15.2 years. Most patients were women (62%; n=1575). Prevalence rates of 15% (n=382) for uncontrolled white coat hypertension and 10% (n=253) for uncontrolled masked hypertension were observed. The rate of BP control in the office was 56.3% and at home, 61%. Meanwhile, 46.4% of the patients had controlled BP in and outside of the office. Greater control was observed in women and in the 49-61 years age group. Considering the new DBHA 2020 threshold for home BP control, the control rate was 42.4%.

CONCLUSION

BP control in the offices of a sample of Brazilian cardiologists was 56.3%; this rate was 61% when BP was measured at home and 46.4% when considering both the office and home.

摘要

背景

已知约 30%的患者在诊室测量的血压(BP)值高于在家测量的值。在全球范围内,仅有 35%接受治疗的高血压患者达到了他们的 BP 目标。

目的

提供巴西心脏病学家诊室中血压控制的流行病学数据,同时考虑诊室和家庭血压测量。

方法

这是一项横断面分析,纳入了诊断为高血压且正在接受降压治疗的患者,无论其血压是否得到控制。BP 由医疗专业人员在诊室测量,在家使用家庭血压监测(HBPM)测量。使用卡方检验(p<0.05)来验证分类变量之间的关联。

结果

研究纳入了 2540 名患者,平均年龄为 59.7 ± 15.2 岁。大多数患者为女性(62%,n=1575)。观察到未控制的白大衣高血压的患病率为 15%(n=382),未控制的隐匿性高血压的患病率为 10%(n=253)。诊室 BP 控制率为 56.3%,家庭 BP 控制率为 61%。同时,46.4%的患者在诊室和家庭均控制了 BP。女性和 49-61 岁年龄组的控制率更高。考虑到新的 2020 年 DBHA 家庭 BP 控制阈值,控制率为 42.4%。

结论

在巴西心脏病学家诊室中,BP 控制率为 56.3%;当在家测量 BP 时,这一比率为 61%,当同时考虑诊室和家庭时,这一比率为 46.4%。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e4cf/10464860/81df00dc9a79/0066-782X-abc-120-08-e20220863-gf04-en.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e4cf/10464860/4dc2d4379b48/0066-782X-abc-120-08-e20220863-gf01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e4cf/10464860/7e2a49dafd90/0066-782X-abc-120-08-e20220863-gf02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e4cf/10464860/57e792349c2e/0066-782X-abc-120-08-e20220863-gf03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e4cf/10464860/9c8a9ccce0d7/0066-782X-abc-120-08-e20220863-gf04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e4cf/10464860/60f03636688a/0066-782X-abc-120-08-e20220863-gf01-en.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e4cf/10464860/762720386f76/0066-782X-abc-120-08-e20220863-gf02-en.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e4cf/10464860/01e4d653b359/0066-782X-abc-120-08-e20220863-gf03-en.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e4cf/10464860/81df00dc9a79/0066-782X-abc-120-08-e20220863-gf04-en.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e4cf/10464860/4dc2d4379b48/0066-782X-abc-120-08-e20220863-gf01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e4cf/10464860/7e2a49dafd90/0066-782X-abc-120-08-e20220863-gf02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e4cf/10464860/57e792349c2e/0066-782X-abc-120-08-e20220863-gf03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e4cf/10464860/9c8a9ccce0d7/0066-782X-abc-120-08-e20220863-gf04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e4cf/10464860/60f03636688a/0066-782X-abc-120-08-e20220863-gf01-en.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e4cf/10464860/762720386f76/0066-782X-abc-120-08-e20220863-gf02-en.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e4cf/10464860/01e4d653b359/0066-782X-abc-120-08-e20220863-gf03-en.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e4cf/10464860/81df00dc9a79/0066-782X-abc-120-08-e20220863-gf04-en.jpg

相似文献

1
National Registry of Hypertension Control Evaluated by Office and Home Measurements: The LHAR National Registry.国家高血压控制办公室和家庭测量评估登记处:LHAR 国家登记处。
Arq Bras Cardiol. 2023 Jul;120(8):e20220863. doi: 10.36660/abc.20220863.
2
Is home blood pressure monitoring useful in the management of patients with resistant hypertension?家庭血压监测在难治性高血压患者的管理中是否有用?
Am J Hypertens. 2015 Feb;28(2):190-9. doi: 10.1093/ajh/hpu145. Epub 2014 Aug 20.
3
Diagnostic Performance of Office versus Ambulatory Blood Pressure in Kidney Transplant Recipients.移植肾功能受者诊室血压与动态血压诊断性能的比较。
Am J Nephrol. 2021;52(7):548-558. doi: 10.1159/000517358. Epub 2021 Jul 26.
4
Prevalence and clinical characteristics of isolated-office and true resistant hypertension determined by ambulatory blood pressure monitoring.通过动态血压监测确定的孤立诊室和真性耐药高血压的患病率及临床特征。
Chronobiol Int. 2013 Mar;30(1-2):207-20. doi: 10.3109/07420528.2012.701135. Epub 2012 Oct 19.
5
Effects of Intensive Versus Standard Office-Based Hypertension Treatment Strategy on White-Coat Effect and Masked Uncontrolled Hypertension: From the SPRINT ABPM Ancillary Study.强化与标准诊室高血压治疗策略对白衣效应和隐匿性未控制高血压的影响:来自 SPRINT 动态血压监测辅助研究。
Hypertension. 2020 Oct;76(4):1090-1096. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.120.15300. Epub 2020 Aug 24.
6
Inconsistent Control Status of Office, Home, and Ambulatory Blood Pressure All Taken Using the Same Device: The HI-JAMP Study Baseline Data.采用同一设备测量的诊室血压、家庭血压和动态血压的控制状态不一致:HI-JAMP 研究基线数据。
Am J Hypertens. 2023 Feb 13;36(2):90-101. doi: 10.1093/ajh/hpac103.
7
Prognosis of white-coat and masked hypertension: International Database of HOme blood pressure in relation to Cardiovascular Outcome.白大衣性高血压和隐蔽性高血压的预后:与心血管结局相关的家庭血压国际数据库。
Hypertension. 2014 Apr;63(4):675-82. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.113.02741. Epub 2014 Jan 13.
8
Home blood pressure measurement as a systematic tool for clinical practice in CKD patients: a real-world picture.家庭血压测量作为 CKD 患者临床实践的系统工具:现实情况。
Panminerva Med. 2018 Mar;60(1):1-7. doi: 10.23736/S0031-0808.17.03336-5. Epub 2017 Nov 22.
9
Home blood pressure control status in 2017-2018 for hypertension specialist centers in Asia: Results of the Asia BP@Home study.2017-2018 年亚洲高血压专科中心家庭血压控制状况:亚洲 BP@Home 研究结果。
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2018 Dec;20(12):1686-1695. doi: 10.1111/jch.13415. Epub 2018 Nov 16.
10
The impact of changing home blood pressure monitoring cutoff from 135/85 to 130/80 mmHg on hypertension phenotypes.将家庭血压监测的截断值从 135/85mmHg 改为 130/80mmHg 对高血压表型的影响。
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2021 Jul;23(7):1447-1451. doi: 10.1111/jch.14261. Epub 2021 May 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Physical Activity and Associated Factors among Brazilian Adult Inmates: A Cross-Sectional Study.巴西成年囚犯的体力活动及相关因素:一项横断面研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 Jun 7;21(6):748. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21060748.
2
The Journey Towards Hypertension Control in Brazil.巴西控制高血压的历程。
Arq Bras Cardiol. 2023 Nov 10;120(8):e20230533. doi: 10.36660/abc.20230533. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
Treated Hypertensive Patients Assessed by Home Blood Pressure Telemonitoring. TeleMRPA Study.家庭血压远程监测评估的高血压患者。TeleMRPA 研究。
Arq Bras Cardiol. 2021 Sep;117(3):520-527. doi: 10.36660/abc.20200073.
2
What are the Optimal Reference Values for Home Blood Pressure Monitoring?家庭血压监测的最佳参考值是什么?
Arq Bras Cardiol. 2021 Mar;116(3):501-503. doi: 10.36660/abc.20201109.
3
Brazilian Guidelines of Hypertension - 2020.《巴西高血压指南 - 2020》
Arq Bras Cardiol. 2021 Mar;116(3):516-658. doi: 10.36660/abc.20201238.
4
2020 International Society of Hypertension Global Hypertension Practice Guidelines.2020年国际高血压学会全球高血压实践指南
Hypertension. 2020 Jun;75(6):1334-1357. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.120.15026. Epub 2020 May 6.
5
Retraction: Banegas JR et al. Relationship between Clinic and Ambulatory Blood-Pressure Measurements and Mortality. N Engl J Med 2018;378:1509-20.撤稿声明:巴内加斯JR等人。临床与动态血压测量值与死亡率之间的关系。《新英格兰医学杂志》2018年;378:1509 - 20。
N Engl J Med. 2020 Feb 20;382(8):786. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc2001445. Epub 2020 Jan 29.
6
Correlation between office and home blood pressure in clinical practice: a comparison with 2017 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Hypertension Guidelines recommendations.临床实践中诊室血压与家庭血压的相关性:与2017年美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会高血压指南建议的比较
J Hypertens. 2020 Jan;38(1):179-181. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000002265.
7
Prevalence of Masked and White-Coat Hypertension in Pre-Hypertensive and Stage 1 Hypertensive patients with the use of TeleMRPA.远程 MRPA 在高血压前期和 1 期高血压患者中对隐匿性和白大衣高血压的患病率评估。
Arq Bras Cardiol. 2019 Nov;113(5):970-975. doi: 10.5935/abc.20190147.
8
2018 Practice Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension of the European Society of Hypertension and the European Society of Cardiology: ESH/ESC Task Force for the Management of Arterial Hypertension.2018年欧洲高血压学会和欧洲心脏病学会动脉高血压管理实践指南:欧洲高血压学会/欧洲心脏病学会动脉高血压管理特别工作组
J Hypertens. 2018 Dec;36(12):2284-2309. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000001961.
9
Impact of 2017 ACC/AHA hypertension guidelines on the prevalence of white-coat and masked hypertension: A home blood pressure monitoring study.2017年美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会高血压指南对白大衣高血压和隐匿性高血压患病率的影响:一项家庭血压监测研究。
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2018 Dec;20(12):1745-1747. doi: 10.1111/jch.13422. Epub 2018 Oct 30.
10
The First Brazilian Registry of Hypertension.巴西高血压登记研究 1 号。
Am Heart J. 2018 Nov;205:154-157. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2018.08.012. Epub 2018 Aug 30.