Suppr超能文献

多平面冠状面膝关节分类的扩展?CT 研究表明与其他平面的对线参数无明显相关性。

Multi-Planar Expansion of the Coronal Plane Alignment of the Knee Classification? A Computed Tomographic Study Indicates No Significant Correlation With Alignment Parameters in Other Planes.

机构信息

Sydney Knee Specialists, Kogarah, New South Wales, Australia.

Stryker Australia Pty Ltd, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

出版信息

J Arthroplasty. 2024 Feb;39(2):336-342. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2023.08.033. Epub 2023 Aug 14.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Coronal Plane Alignment of the Knee (CPAK) classification categorizes knee phenotypes based on constitutional limb alignment (arithmetic hip-knee-ankle angle or aHKA) and joint line obliquity (JLO). This study aimed to determine if sagittal and rotational knee alignments vary among CPAK types in order to establish whether this classification should be expanded beyond coronal plane assessment.

METHODS

Coronal, sagittal, and rotational alignment measurements were made and CPAK types were calculated from computed tomographic data of 437 patients (509 knees) who underwent robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Differences in femoral, tibial, and tibio-femoral angular measurements were compared across CPAK types, and correlations were made to aHKA and JLO. Nonparametric and linear regression tests were used to analyze between-type differences.

RESULTS

There were no differences in tibial slope or femoral rotational measures across CPAK phenotypes. However, CPAK Type III knees had a greater tibio-femoral rotation mean difference than CPAK Type I, II, IV, and V knees (P < .05). We also found increased femoral flexion in Type I knees when compared to Type VI knees (P = .01). The aHKA had a weak correlation with femoral flexion angle, and JLO had a weak correlation with femoral posterior condylar axis to tibial antero-posterior axis angle.

CONCLUSION

Few clinically important differences in sagittal and rotational alignments were found between CPAK types, indicating that CPAK phenotype has little correlation to 3-dimensional alignment characteristics. Need for an expansion of the CPAK classification beyond coronal plane alignment is not supported from these results.

摘要

背景

膝关节冠状面排列(CPAK)分类基于固有肢体排列(算术髋膝踝角或 aHKA)和关节线倾斜(JLO)对膝关节表型进行分类。本研究旨在确定 CPAA 类型之间矢状面和旋转膝关节排列是否存在差异,以便确定是否需要在冠状面评估之外扩展这种分类。

方法

对接受机器人辅助全膝关节置换术(TKA)的 437 名患者(509 膝)的 CT 数据进行冠状、矢状和旋转排列测量,并计算 CPAA 类型。比较 CPAA 类型之间股骨、胫骨和胫股角测量值的差异,并与 aHKA 和 JLO 进行相关性分析。使用非参数和线性回归检验分析类型间差异。

结果

CPAA 表型之间的胫骨斜率或股骨旋转测量值没有差异。然而,CPAA 型 III 膝关节的胫股旋转平均差值大于 CPAA 型 I、II、IV 和 V 膝关节(P<.05)。与 CPAA 型 VI 膝关节相比,CPAA 型 I 膝关节的股骨屈曲度也增加(P=.01)。aHKA 与股骨屈曲角度有较弱的相关性,JLO 与股骨后髁轴到胫骨前后轴角度有较弱的相关性。

结论

CPAA 类型之间矢状面和旋转排列的差异很小,表明 CPAA 表型与 3 维排列特征相关性不大。这些结果不支持 CPAA 分类除了冠状面排列之外的扩展。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验